Literature DB >> 26735559

Ventricular Recovery and Pump Explantation in Patients Supported by Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review.

Kevin Phan1, Ya Ruth Huo, Dong Fang Zhao, Tristan D Yan, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili.   

Abstract

Several studies have reported that a portion of patients who exhibit cardiac recovery during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support can have their device explanted with reasonable long-term survival. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the survival and cardiac function in patients with explanted LVADs from the current literature. Electronic search was performed to identify all studies in English literature assessing LVAD explantation. All identified articles were systematically assessed using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Selected studies were subjected to quantitative assessment. From 5 electronic databases, 11 studies (213 patients) were included. Pooled mean perioperative mortality rate of those explanted was 9.2% (95% CI, 5.0-14.5%; I = 0). Pooled mean late mortality rate was 15% (95% CI, 9.0-22.1%; I = 31%). The pooled 1, 5, and 10 year survival postexplant was 91, 76, and 65.7%, respectively. Pooled postweaning freedom from heart failure (HF) recurrence reached 81.3%. Subset analysis demonstrated that patients explanted from a continuous-flow LVAD versus pulsatile LVAD had a lower rate of HF recurrence (6.6 vs. 28.3%, p = 0.03) and LVAD reimplantation (7.5 vs. 37%, p = 0.001). Before LVAD explantation, overall mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 49%. Weighted pooled early and late postexplantation mean LVEF was 47.3 and 41.2%, respectively. Late postexplantation LVEF was significantly higher in the continuous-flow versus pulsatile LVAD subgroup (41.5 vs. 24%, p = 0.001). This review shows encouraging safety and 10 year survival outcomes after explantation of LVADs in carefully selected patients, with rates better than expected after a heart transplant. Recovery of the native heart is the most desirable clinical outcome in patients supported with LVADs and should be actively sought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26735559     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular assist device-induced reverse remodeling: it's not just about myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Karolina K Marinescu; Nir Uriel; Douglas L Mann; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Successful management of apical abscess after Nipro left ventricular assisted device explantation by removal of apical cuff and omentopexy.

Authors:  Shuichi Yoshitake; Yoshifumi Itoda; Kan Nawata; Tomoyuki Iwase; Yasuhiro Hoshino; Mitsutoshi Kimura; Osamu Kinoshita; Haruo Yamauchi; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 3.  Left ventricular assist device recovery: does duration of mechanical support matter?

Authors:  Binh N Pham; Sandra V Chaparro
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Review and reflections about pulsatile ventricular assist devices from history to future: concerning safety and low haemolysis-still needed.

Authors:  Inge Köhne
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  Identifying Patients With a Higher Potential for Recovery Post Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Arslan Mirza; Carlos Manuel Romero; Yoshiya Toyoda; Eman A Hamad
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2021

6.  Percutaneous approach to left ventricular assist device decommissioning.

Authors:  Francesco Moroni; Keyur B Shah; Mohammed A Quader; Katherine Klein; Melissa C Smallfield; Kendall E Parris; Zachary M Gertz
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.585

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.