| Literature DB >> 26735221 |
Lawrence H Lin1, Lisandra S Bernardes1, Eliane A Hase1, Koji Fushida1, Rossana P V Francisco1.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Doppler ultrasound is a non-invasive method for evaluating vascularization and is widely used in clinical practice. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia includes a group of highly vascularized malignancies derived from placental cells. This review summarizes data found in the literature regarding the applications of Doppler ultrasound in managing patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. The PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane and LILACS databases were searched for articles published in English until 2014 using the following keywords: "Gestational trophoblastic disease AND Ultrasonography, Doppler." Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were separated into the 4 following groups according to the aim of the study. (1) Doppler ultrasound does not seem to be capable of differentiating partial from complete moles, but it might be useful when evaluating pregnancies in which a complete mole coexists with a normal fetus. (2) There is controversy in the role of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in the prediction of development of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. (3) Doppler ultrasound is a useful tool in the diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia because abnormal myometrial vascularization and lower uterine artery Doppler indices seem to be correlated with invasive disease. (4) Lower uterine artery Doppler indices in the diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia are associated with methotrexate resistance and might play a role in prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26735221 PMCID: PMC4676324 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(12)08
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Flow chart describing the mechanism of search.
Studies that evaluated the correlation between UA Doppler indices and the development of post-molar trophoblastic tumors before uterine evacuation. n: number of patients; S/D: systolic/diastolic velocity; PI: pulsatility index; RI: resistance index.
| Study | Patients with spontaneous remission | Patients with persistent disease | Conclusion | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | S/D | PI | RI | n | S/D | PI | RI | ||
| Yalcin et al., 2001 | 16 | 5.1 | 1.82 | 0.8 | 5 | 2.27 | 0.86 | 0.55 | Lower uterine artery indices (S/D, PI, RI) before uterine evacuation were associated with persistent disease ( |
| Gungor et al., 1998 | 20 | - | - | 0.46 | 12 | - | - | 0.29 | Lower uterine artery RI before uterine evacuation was associated with persistent disease ( |
| Chan et al., 1996 | 11 | - | - | 0.76 | 21 | - | - | 0.69 | No association between uterine artery RI before uterine evacuation and persistent disease. |
Studies that evaluated the UA RI in gestational trophoblastic disease, normal pregnancy and non-pregnant women. GTN: gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; HM: hydatidiform mole; n: number of patients; UA RI: uterine artery resistance index; CC: choriocarcinoma; IM: invasive mole; CHM: complete hydatidiform mole; PHM: partial hydatidiform mole.
| Study | GTN | HM | Pregnant | Non-pregnant | Conclusion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | UA RI | n | UA RI | n | UA RI | n | UA RI | ||
| Tepper et al., 1994 | 3 | 0.410 ± 0.04 | - | - | 20 | 0.494 ± 0.06 | - | - | Lower UA RI in GTN compared with first-trimester pregnant woman |
| Chan et al., 1996 | 32 | 0.68 ± 0.16 | - | - | 18 | 0.8 ± 0.09 | 23 | 0.9 ± 0.08 | Lower UA RI in GTN compared with non-pregnant and first-trimester pregnant woman |
| Hsieh et al., 1994 | 23 | 0.56 ± 0.19 | 15 | 0.75 ± 0.06 | - | - | 55 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | Higher peak systolic velocity and lower UA RI in GTN compared with non-pregnant and post-evacuation uneventful moles |
| Zhou et al., 2005 | 32 (CC) 184 (IM) | 0.25± 0.05 (CC) 0.28 ± 0.06 IM) | 106 (CHM) 33 (PHM) | 0.55 ± 0.06 (CHM) 0.56 ± 0.04 (PHM) | 13 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | - | - | Lower UA RI in GTN compared with hydatidiform moles and first-trimester pregnant woman |
Studies that evaluated the role of Doppler ultrasound to predict chemotherapy resistance. GTN: gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; n: number of patients; UA S/D: uterine artery systolic/diastolic velocity; UA PI: uterine artery pulsatility index; UA RI: uterine artery resistance index.
| Study | Chemo-resistant GTN | Chemo-sensitive GTN | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Park et al., 1994 | 5 | 11 | UA S/D before treatment was not significantly different in patients with chemoresistant and sensitive disease. After completion of chemotherapy, UA S/D increased in patients with remitted disease (2.72±1.31 to 6.23±2.38), whereas in patients with resistant GTN, UA S/D did not change (2.69±1.8 to 3.08±1.54) |
| Oguz et al., 2004 | 7 | 30 | A cuff-off value of 4 cm or higher of myometrial invasion and vascularization RI≤0.28 were proposed to predict single-agent chemotherapy resistance |
| Long et al., 1992 | 8 | 42 | This prospective study established a cut-off value of UA PI≤1.1 associated with an elevated likelihood of GTN patients developing chemoresistance |
| Agarwal et al., 2002 | 47 | 117 | This retrospective study established that a UA PI≤1.0 detected resistance with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 62%, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.27 for methotrexate resistance in low-risk GTN |
| Sita-Lumsden et al., 2013 | 43 | 30 | In patients with a GTN FIGO score of 5-6, the risk of chemoresistance was 67% with a UA PI≤1, compared with 42% when the UA PI was >1 |
| Agarwal et al., 2012 | 113 | 126 | A lower UA PI in patients with low-risk GTN with chemoresistance and UA PI≤1 was a risk factor independent of the FIGO score for methotrexate resistance. Patients with a FIGO score of 6 and UA PI≤1 had 100% resistance to methotrexate |
| Hsieh et al., 1994 | 13 (GTN needing ≥5 courses of chemotherapy) | 10 (GTN needing <5 courses of chemotherapy) | Higher mean UA RI in patients requiring fewer than 5 cycles of chemotherapy (0.71±0.09) compared to patients requiring longer chemotherapy (0.47±0.14). There was an evident decrease in the UA peak systolic velocity after the first three chemotherapy cycles in the group requiring less courses of treatment (54.2 to 23.6 cm/s compared to 60.1 to 60 cm/s) |