| Literature DB >> 26735174 |
Lara M Riehl1, Johannes H Schulte2,3, Medhanie A Mulaw4,5, Meike Dahlhaus1, Matthias Fischer6,7, Alexander Schramm8, Angelika Eggert2, Klaus-Michael Debatin1, Christian Beltinger1.
Abstract
Little is known about changes within the mitochondrial (mt) genome during tumor progression in general and during initiation and progression of neuroblastoma (NB) in particular. Whole exome sequencing of corresponding healthy tissue, primary tumor and relapsed tumor from 16 patients with NB revealed that most NB harbor tumor-specific mitochondrial variants. In relapsed tumors, the status of mt variants changed in parallel to the status of nuclear variants, as shown by increased number and spatio-temporal differences of tumor-specific variants, and by a concomitant decrease of germline variants. As mt variants are present in most NB patients, change during relapse and have a higher copy number compared to nuclear variants, they represent a promising new source of biomarkers for monitoring and phylogenetic analysis of NB.Entities:
Keywords: mitochondrial variants; neuroblastoma; next generation sequencing; phylogenetic analysis; tumor progression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26735174 PMCID: PMC4872737 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1The mitochondrial genome in NB
(A) The majority of NB harbors tumor-specific mt variants, with increased frequency at relapse. The number of tumor-specific mt variants per patient present in the primary tumor at diagnosis (P), relapsed tumor (R) or both (P + R) is shown. (B) The number of tumor-specific mt variants increases at relapse while the number of germline mt variants decreases during tumor initiation and relapse. In the left panel, the number of tumor-specific mt variants per patient in the primary (P) and the relapsed (R) tumor is shown. In the right panel, the number of germline mt variants per patient in normal tissue (N), primary tumor (P) and relapsed tumor (R) is depicted. (C) At relapse, the number of tumor-specific and germline mt variants significantly increases and decreases, respectively. In the left panel, the paired differences of tumor-specific variants between primary (P) and relapsed tumor (R) of each patient are plotted. The null hypothesis of the mean of the paired differences being equal to 0 was tested by Monte Carlo simulation and the exact p-value was calculated. For the right panel, a linear regression model was fitted for each patient. The slope coefficients of the fitted lines were used to depict the trend. The distribution of the coefficients is plotted. The null hypothesis, i.e. the mean of these coefficients being 0 when the number of variants in normal tissue, primary tumor and relapse are randomly distributed, was tested by Monte Carlo simulation and the exact p-value was calculated.
Number of tumor-specific and germline mt variants with corresponding differences and coefficients
| Patient | Tumor-specific mt variants ( | Difference | Germline mt variants ( | Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | R | P | R | |||
| 1 | 10 | 4 | −6 | 187 | 51 | −175.5 |
| 2 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 5 | 66 | −62.0 |
| 3 | 4 | 19 | 15 | 191 | 30 | −6.0 |
| 4 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 10 | 160 | 40.5 |
| 5 | 4 | 19 | 15 | 265 | 223 | −64.0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 219 | 110 | −23.5 |
| 7 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 3 | 84 | −1.0 |
| 8 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 36 | 115 | 40.5 |
| 9 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 277 | 231 | 12.5 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 59 | −110.0 |
| 11 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 3 | 62 | −32.5 |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 49 | −138.5 |
| 13 | 12 | 14 | 2 | 219 | 113 | 15.0 |
| 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −3.0 |
| 15 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 350 | 172 | −135.5 |
| 16 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 141 | 55 | −74.5 |
Number of tumor-specific mt variants: P, primary tumor; R, relapse tumor. Variants with an allele frequency of at least 1% were analyzed.
Difference: Pairwise difference between primary and relapse tumor.
Number of germline mt variants: P, primary tumor; R, relapse tumor. Variants with an allele frequency of at least 1% were analyzed.
Coefficient: Coefficient as calculated by linear regression.
Figure 2Multiple relapses in patient #12 reveal spatio-temporal change of tumor-specific mt variants
The upper panel shows time and site of occurrence of the primary tumor and the relapses. The lower panel depicts the branching of relapse samples R1–R5 from the primary tumor P. Branch lengths reflect the phylogenetic distance between tumor samples (bar equals 0.2 base substitutions per site), numbers represent bootstrap values (%) supporting a given branching point. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the Neighbor-Joining method for evolutionary history and the Jukes-Cantor method for evolutionary distances.
Figure 3The mutation spectrum of the mt genome suggests replication-dependent DNA damage and does not change at relapse
Primary and relapsed tumors are compared. The 6 base substitutions classes are indicated on the top and the bases flanking the substitutions 5′ and 3′ are depicted at the bottom. The percentages show the observed frequencies of the base substitutions within their sequence context normalized by the frequency seen in the Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS) of the mt genome.