| Literature DB >> 26733703 |
Mitesh S Patel1, David A Asch2, Andrea B Troxel3, Michele Fletcher4, Rosemary Osman-Koss5, Jennifer Brady6, Lisa Wesby7, Victoria Hilbert8, Jingsan Zhu9, Wenli Wang10, Kevin G Volpp11.
Abstract
Employers commonly use adjustments to health insurance premiums as incentives to encourage healthy behavior, but the effectiveness of those adjustments is controversial. We gave 197 obese participants in a workplace wellness program a weight loss goal equivalent to 5 percent of their baseline weight. They were randomly assigned to a control arm, with no financial incentive for achieving the goal, or to one of three intervention arms offering an incentive valued at $550. Two intervention arms used health insurance premium adjustments, beginning the following year (delayed) or in the first pay period after achieving the goal (immediate). A third arm used a daily lottery incentive separate from premiums. At twelve months there were no statistically significant differences in mean weight change either between the control group (whose members had a mean gain of 0.1 pound) and any of the incentive groups (delayed premium adjustment, -1.2 pound; immediate premium adjustment, -1.4 pound; daily lottery incentive, -1.0 pound) or among the intervention groups. The apparent failure of the incentives to promote weight loss suggests that employers that encourage weight reduction through workplace wellness programs should test alternatives to the conventional premium adjustment approach by using alternative incentive designs, larger incentives, or both. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.Entities:
Keywords: Employer-Based System < Insurance; Health Promotion/Disease Prevention; Organization and Delivery of Care
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26733703 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301