Literature DB >> 26733644

The jumbo acetabular component for acetabular revision: Curtain Calls and Caveats.

P F Lachiewicz1, T S Watters1.   

Abstract

The 'jumbo' acetabular component is now commonly used in acetabular revision surgery where there is extensive bone loss. It offers high surface contact, permits weight bearing over a large area of the pelvis, the need for bone grafting is reduced and it is usually possible to restore centre of rotation of the hip. Disadvantages of its use include a technique in which bone structure may not be restored, a risk of excessive posterior bone loss during reaming, an obligation to employ screw fixation, limited bone ingrowth with late failure and high hip centre, leading to increased risk of dislocation. Contraindications include unaddressed pelvic dissociation, inability to implant the component with a rim fit, and an inability to achieve screw fixation. Use in acetabulae with < 50% bone stock has also been questioned. Published results have been encouraging in the first decade, with late failures predominantly because of polyethylene wear and aseptic loosening. Dislocation is the most common complication of jumbo acetabular revisions, with an incidence of approximately 10%, and often mandates revision. Based on published results, a hemispherical component with an enhanced porous coating, highly cross-linked polyethylene, and a large femoral head appears to represent the optimum tribology for jumbo acetabular revisions. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetabular revision; jumbo acetabular component; revision total hip replacement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26733644     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Timothy Wright; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Alexander Gu; Mathias Bostrom; Fares Haddad; Seth Jerabek; Michael Bolognesi; Thomas Fehring; Alejandro Gonzalez DellaValle; William Jiranek; William Walter; Wayne Paprosky; Donald Garbuz; Thomas Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-09-28

2.  Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Based on 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology Using Jumbo Cups.

Authors:  Xianyue Shen; Hao Tian; Yang Li; Jianlin Zuo; Zhongli Gao; Jianlin Xiao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 3.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of jumbo cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Qiuyuan Wang; Qi Wang; Pei Liu; Juncheng Ge; Qidong Zhang; Wanshou Guo; Weiguo Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-10-04

4.  How to prevent dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the risk factors and a focus on treatment options.

Authors:  C Faldini; N Stefanini; D Fenga; E M Neonakis; F Perna; A Mazzotti; F Pilla; I K Triantafyllopoulos; F Traina
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-09-10

5.  Titanium Acetabular Component Deformation under Cyclic Loading.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Rudi G Bitsch; Theresa Bormann; Steffen Braun; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  High risk of hip dislocation following polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty-is cup revision necessary?

Authors:  D Dammerer; F Schneider; T Renkawitz; D Putzer; M Bogensperger; R Biedermann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.