Literature DB >> 26732899

Validity and everyday clinical applicability of lumbar muscle fatigue assessment methods in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.

Jorge H Villafañe1, Massimiliano Gobbo2,3, Matteo Peranzoni1, Ganesh Naik4, Grace Imperio1, Joshua A Cleland5, Stefano Negrini1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This systematic literature review aimed at examining the validity and applicability in everyday clinical rehabilitation practise of methods for the assessment of back muscle fatiguability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP).
METHODS: Extensive research was performed in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from their inception to September 2014. Potentially relevant articles were also manually looked for in the reference lists of the identified publications. Studies examining lumbar muscle fatigue in people with CNSLBP were selected. Two reviewers independently selected the articles, carried out the study quality assessment and extracted the results. A modified Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) scale was used to evaluate the scientific rigour of the selected works.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review. We found conflicting data regarding the validity of methods used to examine back muscle fatigue. The Biering-Sorensen test, performed in conjunction with surface electromyography spectral analysis, turned out to be the most widely used and comparatively, the most optimal modality currently available to assess objective back muscle fatigue in daily clinical practise, even though critical limitations are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research should address the identification of an advanced method for lower back fatigue assessment in patients with CNSLBP which, eventually, might provide physical therapists with an objective and reliable test usable in everyday clinical practise. Implications for Rehabilitation Despite its limitations, the Biering-Sorensen test is currently the most used, convenient and easily available fatiguing test for lumbar muscles. To increase validity and reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test, concomitant activation of synergistic muscles should be taken into account. Pooled mean frequency and half-width of the spectrum are currently the most valid electromyographic parameters to assess fatigue in chronic non-specific low back pain. Body mass index, grading of pain and level of disability of the study population should be reported to enhance research quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; fatigue; low back pain; lumbar muscles

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26732899     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  16 in total

1.  Is the timed loaded standing test a valid measure of back muscle endurance in people with vertebral osteoporosis?

Authors:  M Newman; R Newman; T Hughes; K Vadher; K L Barker
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison between the Original- and a Standardized Version of a Physical Assessment Test for the Dorsal Chain - A Cohort-Based Cross Sectional Study.

Authors:  Anna Gabriel; Florian Kurt Paternoster; Andreas Konrad; Thomas Horstmann; Torsten Pohl
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

3.  No alteration of back muscle oxygenation during isometric exercise in individuals with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Anke Langenfeld; Brigitte Wirth; Andrea Scherer-Vrana; Fabienne Riner; Kyra Gaehwiler; Paola Valdivieso; B Kim Humphreys; Felix Scholkmann; Martin Flueck; Petra Schweinhardt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Repeated standing back extension exercise: Influence on muscle shear modulus change after lumbodorsal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Tsuneo Kumamoto; Toshiaki Seko; Ryo Matsuda; Sayo Miura
Journal:  Work       Date:  2021

5.  Recovery of Hip and Back Muscle Fatigue Following a Back Extension Endurance Test.

Authors:  Sharon Wang-Price; Mohammad Almadan; Carissa Stoddard; Dustin Moore
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-03-01

6.  Assessment of Whole Body and Local Muscle Fatigue Using Electromyography and a Perceived Exertion Scale for Squat Lifting.

Authors:  Imran Ahmad; Jung-Yong Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Reference values and reliability for lumbopelvic strength and endurance in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Isadora O de Oliveira; Bruna Pilz; Roberto L G Santos; Rodrigo A Vasconcelos; Wilson Mello; Débora B Grossi
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Lumbar stabilisation exercises versus back endurance-resistance exercise training in athletes with chronic low back pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alexandre Henrique Nowotny; Mariene Guizeline Calderon; Pablo Albuquerque de Souza; Andreo Fernando Aguiar; Guillaume Léonard; Bruno Mazziotti Oliveira Alves; Cesar Ferreira Amorim; Rubens Alexandre da Silva
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-11-22

9.  Age- and sex-specific effects in paravertebral surface electromyographic back extensor muscle fatigue in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Gerold Ebenbichler; Richard Habenicht; Sara Ziegelbecker; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Thomas Kienbacher
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 7.713

10.  Patient Transfers and Risk of Back Injury: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study With Technical Measurements of Exposure.

Authors:  Jonas Vinstrup; Pascal Madeleine; Markus Due Jakobsen; Kenneth Jay; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.