Literature DB >> 26732861

Optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of left-sided heart structures in patients with aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation based on multislice computed tomography.

Marco Spaziano1, Pascal Thériault-Lauzier1, Nicholas Meti1, Beatriz Vaquerizo1, Philipp Blanke2, Jine Deli-Hussein1, Michael Chetrit1, Christos Galatos1, Jean Buithieu1, Rüdiger Lange3, Giuseppe Martucci1, Jonathon Leipsic2, Nicolo Piazza4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter interventions are currently undertaken using "generic" fluoroscopic viewing angles. However, the position and orientation of heart structures may vary across patients and disease-specific remodeling processes.
OBJECTIVE: This study uses multislice computed tomography to determine optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of the aortic and mitral annuli, the left atrial appendage and the atrial septum. We explored differences between patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and severe mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The multislice computed tomographies of 28 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and 32 patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (MR) were analyzed. For each patient, we evaluated the optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of the aortic and mitral annuli (en face, maximal and minimal diameters, aortic root with right, left and non coronary sinus in center), left atrial appendage orifice (en face, maximal and minimal diameters), and atrial septum (fossa ovalis) en face. The TAVR implantation view with right coronary sinus in center was LAO 9 - CRA 0 in the AS group and LAO 6 - CAU 5 in the MR group (p = NS). AS and MR patients differed significantly with respect to the fluoroscopic angulation of the aortic annulus en face (8.3°), the aortic annulus maximal (17.7°) and minimal (18.5°) diameters, the mitral annulus aorto-mural diameter (11.3°), and the left atrial appendage orifice en face (11.1°) (all p-values<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of left-sided structures vary considerably between patients. Multislice computed tomography is a valuable tool to determine the most procedurally relevant angulations, with the potential to optimize procedural safety, efficacy and duration.
Copyright © 2016 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluoroscopic anatomy; Interventional imaging; Multi-slice computed tomography; Multiplanar reconstruction; Transcatheter cardiac intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26732861     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  4 in total

1.  Recursive multiresolution convolutional neural networks for 3D aortic valve annulus planimetry.

Authors:  Pascal Theriault-Lauzier; Hind Alsosaimi; Negareh Mousavi; Jean Buithieu; Marco Spaziano; Giuseppe Martucci; James Brophy; Nicolo Piazza
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  The Crucial Role of Cardiac Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Pre- and Post-procedural Assessment.

Authors:  Saif Al-Najafi; Frank Sanchez; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Comparison between the SAPIEN S3 and the SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valves: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Fadi J Sawaya; Marco Spaziano; Thierry Lefèvre; Andrew Roy; Phillippe Garot; Thomas Hovasse; Antoinette Neylon; Hakim Benamer; Mauro Romano; Thierry Unterseeh; Marie-Claude Morice; Bernard Chevalier
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-26

4.  Fully automated measurement of aortic root anatomy using Philips HeartNavigator computed tomography software: fast, accurate, or both?

Authors:  Viktor Kočka; Lucie Bártová; Naďa Valošková; Marek Laboš; Jiří Weichet; Marek Neuberg; And Petr Toušek
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.803

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.