B Vishnu Bhat1, P Prasad2, Venkata Banda Ravi Kumar3, B N Harish4, K Krishnakumari3, Anand Rekha3, G Manjunath3, B Adhisivam2, B Shruthi2. 1. Department of Neonatology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India. drvishnubhat@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Neonatology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India. 3. XCyton Diagnostics Pvt Ltd, Peenya, Bangalore, India. 4. Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based molecular diagnostic method -- Syndrome Evaluation System (SES) directed treatment strategy vs. standard of care (blood culture) directed treatment strategy for neonatal sepsis. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 385 neonates with sepsis who were randomized into two groups -- SES and control (BACTEC). Both tests were performed for all the neonates. However, in the SES group, the results of SES test were revealed to the treating clinicians, while in the control group, SES results were withheld. Two ml of blood was drawn from each baby. One aliquot was sent for blood culture, whereas the remaining aliquot was sent for SES. Babies were then administered empirical IV antibiotics and given supportive care. Further antibiotic changes, if required were done in SES and control groups based on their respective reports. The microbiological profile, immediate outcome, duration of hospital stay, number of antibiotics used and readmission within a month in both groups were compared. RESULTS:SES was better than BACTEC in identifying the causative organism in both the groups (68 % vs. 18 % in SES group and 72 % vs. 18 % in control group). SES had 100 % concordance with blood culture by BACTEC. Detection of bacteria and fungi were four and ten-fold higher respectively with SES when compared to BACTEC culture. Microbiological diagnosis was rapid with SES compared to BACTEC (7 h vs. 72 h). Treatment based on SES resulted in significantly less mortality (3 % vs. 18 %). Readmission rate, duration of hospital stay and change in antibiotics were also significantly less in SES group. CONCLUSIONS: This new molecular based diagnostic system (SES) helps in rapid and accurate diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and reduces mortality and morbidity in affected neonates.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcome of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based molecular diagnostic method -- Syndrome Evaluation System (SES) directed treatment strategy vs. standard of care (blood culture) directed treatment strategy for neonatal sepsis. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 385 neonates with sepsis who were randomized into two groups -- SES and control (BACTEC). Both tests were performed for all the neonates. However, in the SES group, the results of SES test were revealed to the treating clinicians, while in the control group, SES results were withheld. Two ml of blood was drawn from each baby. One aliquot was sent for blood culture, whereas the remaining aliquot was sent for SES. Babies were then administered empirical IV antibiotics and given supportive care. Further antibiotic changes, if required were done in SES and control groups based on their respective reports. The microbiological profile, immediate outcome, duration of hospital stay, number of antibiotics used and readmission within a month in both groups were compared. RESULTS:SES was better than BACTEC in identifying the causative organism in both the groups (68 % vs. 18 % in SES group and 72 % vs. 18 % in control group). SES had 100 % concordance with blood culture by BACTEC. Detection of bacteria and fungi were four and ten-fold higher respectively with SES when compared to BACTEC culture. Microbiological diagnosis was rapid with SES compared to BACTEC (7 h vs. 72 h). Treatment based on SES resulted in significantly less mortality (3 % vs. 18 %). Readmission rate, duration of hospital stay and change in antibiotics were also significantly less in SES group. CONCLUSIONS: This new molecular based diagnostic system (SES) helps in rapid and accurate diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and reduces mortality and morbidity in affected neonates.
Entities:
Keywords:
Neonatal; Polymerase chain reaction; Sepsis; Syndrome evaluation system (SES)
Authors: Iruka N Okeke; Rosanna W Peeling; Herman Goossens; Raymond Auckenthaler; Stuart S Olmsted; Jean-François de Lavison; Barbara L Zimmer; Mark D Perkins; Katarina Nordqvist Journal: Drug Resist Updat Date: 2011-03-12 Impact factor: 18.500
Authors: Brian M Peters; Mary Ann Jabra-Rizk; Graeme A O'May; J William Costerton; Mark E Shirtliff Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Ming Ying Gan; Wen Li Lee; Bei Jun Yap; Shu Ting Tammie Seethor; Rachel G Greenberg; Jen Heng Pek; Bobby Tan; Christoph Paul Vincent Hornik; Jan Hau Lee; Shu-Ling Chong Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.569
Authors: D C Richter; A Heininger; T Brenner; M Hochreiter; M Bernhard; J Briegel; S Dubler; B Grabein; A Hecker; W A Kruger; K Mayer; M W Pletz; D Storzinger; N Pinder; T Hoppe-Tichy; S Weiterer; S Zimmermann; A Brinkmann; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: D C Richter; A Heininger; T Brenner; M Hochreiter; M Bernhard; J Briegel; S Dubler; B Grabein; A Hecker; W A Krüger; K Mayer; M W Pletz; D Störzinger; N Pinder; T Hoppe-Tichy; S Weiterer; S Zimmermann; A Brinkmann; M A Weigand; Christoph Lichtenstern Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Sunil R Govekar; Latha P Lakshman; Vijayalakshmi Reddy; Reeta S Mani; Anita Mahadevan; Shankar K Susarla; Anita Desai; Ravi Kumar Venkata Banda; Ravi Vasanthapuram Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Cían J Henry; Gergana Semova; Ellen Barnes; Isabel Cotter; Tara Devers; Aisyah Rafaee; Andreea Slavescu; Niamh O Cathain; Danielle McCollum; Edna Roche; David Mockler; John Allen; Judith Meehan; Claus Klingenberg; Jos M Latour; Agnes van den Hoogen; Tobias Strunk; Eric Giannoni; Luregn J Schlapbach; Marina Degtyareva; Frans B Plötz; Willem P de Boode; Lars Naver; James L Wynn; Helmut Küster; Jan Janota; Fleur M Keij; Irwin K M Reiss; Joseph M Bliss; Richard Polin; Joyce M Koenig; Mark A Turner; Christopher Gale; Eleanor J Molloy Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Sophie C H Wen; Yukiko Ezure; Lauren Rolley; Geoff Spurling; Colleen L Lau; Saba Riaz; David L Paterson; Adam D Irwin Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 11.069