Laurence Legrand1, Marie Tisserand1, Guillaume Turc1, Myriam Edjlali1, David Calvet1, Denis Trystram1, Pauline Roca1, Olivier Naggara1, Jean-Louis Mas1, Jean-Francois Méder1, Jean-Claude Baron1, Catherine Oppenheim2. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (L.L., M.T., M.E., D.T., P.R., O.N., J.-F.M., C.O.) and Neurology (G.T., D.C., J.-L.M., J.-C.B.), Université Paris-Descartes Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, INSERM S894, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, DHU Neurovasc, Paris, France. 2. From the Departments of Radiology (L.L., M.T., M.E., D.T., P.R., O.N., J.-F.M., C.O.) and Neurology (G.T., D.C., J.-L.M., J.-C.B.), Université Paris-Descartes Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, INSERM S894, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, DHU Neurovasc, Paris, France. c.oppenheim@ch-sainte-anne.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities (FVH) beyond the boundaries of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion (FVH-DWI mismatch) have been proposed as an alternative to perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI)-DWI mismatch. We aimed to establish whether FVH-DWI mismatch can identify patients most likely to benefit from recanalization. METHODS: FVH-DWI mismatch was assessed in 164 patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion before intravenous thrombolysis. PWI-DWI mismatch (PWITmax>6sec/DWI>1.8) was assessed in the 104 patients with available PWI data. We tested the associations between 24-hours complete recanalization on magnetic resonance angiography and 3-month favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), stratified on FVH-DWI (or PWI-DWI) status. RESULTS: FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 121/164 (74%) patients and recanalization in 50/164 (30%) patients. The odds ratio for favorable outcome with recanalization was 16.2 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-46.5; P<0.0001) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch and 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-12.1; P=0.22) in those without FVH-DWI mismatch (P=0.048 for interaction). Recanalization was associated with favorable outcome in patients with PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-31.3; P=0.0001) and in patients without PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-44.1; P=0.047), P=0.76 for interaction. CONCLUSION: The FVH-DWI mismatch may rapidly identify patients with proximal occlusion most likely to benefit from recanalization.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities (FVH) beyond the boundaries of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion (FVH-DWI mismatch) have been proposed as an alternative to perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI)-DWI mismatch. We aimed to establish whether FVH-DWI mismatch can identify patients most likely to benefit from recanalization. METHODS: FVH-DWI mismatch was assessed in 164 patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion before intravenous thrombolysis. PWI-DWI mismatch (PWITmax>6sec/DWI>1.8) was assessed in the 104 patients with available PWI data. We tested the associations between 24-hours complete recanalization on magnetic resonance angiography and 3-month favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2), stratified on FVH-DWI (or PWI-DWI) status. RESULTS: FVH-DWI mismatch was present in 121/164 (74%) patients and recanalization in 50/164 (30%) patients. The odds ratio for favorable outcome with recanalization was 16.2 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-46.5; P<0.0001) in patients with FVH-DWI mismatch and 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-12.1; P=0.22) in those without FVH-DWI mismatch (P=0.048 for interaction). Recanalization was associated with favorable outcome in patients with PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-31.3; P=0.0001) and in patients without PWI-DWI mismatch (odds ratios, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-44.1; P=0.047), P=0.76 for interaction. CONCLUSION: The FVH-DWI mismatch may rapidly identify patients with proximal occlusion most likely to benefit from recanalization.
Authors: Wang Dongmei; Hao Peng; Wang Mengyao; Lin Zhenzhou; Zhou Liang; Fan Zusen; Pan Yue; Zhang Xiaomei; Pan Suyue; J I Zhong Journal: Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao Date: 2020-01-30
Authors: I Derraz; M Pou; J Labreuche; L Legrand; S Soize; M Tisserand; C Rosso; M Piotin; G Boulouis; C Oppenheim; O Naggara; S Bracard; F Clarençon; B Lapergue; R Bourcier Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lei Song; Cui Lyu; Guiquan Shen; Tingting Guo; Jiangtao Wang; Wanbi Wang; Xiaoming Qiu; Alexander Lerner; Max Wintermark; Bo Gao Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Nolwenn Riou-Comte; Benjamin Gory; Marc Soudant; François Zhu; Yu Xie; Lisa Humbertjean; Gioia Mione; Catherine Oppenheim; Francis Guillemin; Serge Bracard; Sébastien Richard Journal: Stroke Vasc Neurol Date: 2021-06-08