| Literature DB >> 26731720 |
Elisabeth Svensson1, Stefan Schouten1,2, Ellen C Hopmans1, Jack J Middelburg2, Jaap S Sinninghe Damsté1,2.
Abstract
Lipid extraction of biomass prior to stable isotoEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26731720 PMCID: PMC4701503 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Ranges of δ15N values and C:N ratios for bulk biomass, residual (lipid-free) biomass and lipids (total lipid extract) per species and tissue type.
n = number of individuals analyzed. Standard deviation of δ15N values from replicate measurements were for bulk and lipid-free biomass ≤0.6 ‰, for total lipid extract ≤0.9.
| Bulk biomass | Residual biomass | Total lipid extract | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Tissue | n | %lipids | δ15N | C:N | n | δ15N | C:N | n | δ15N | C:N |
| Atlantic herring | Gill | 6 | 19–32 | 10.6–14.4 | 4.8–8.0 | 6 | 10.7–13.7 | 3.0–3.3 | 4 | 0.4–9.2 | 62.9 |
| Muscle | 6 | 7–40 | 11.4–16.2 | 3.3–6.1 | 6 | 11.4–16.3 | 2.4–3.1 | 5 | -0.5–3.1 | 14.6–23.2 | |
| Brown trout | Gill | 6 | 4–11 | 13.9–16.3 | 3.7–4.0 | 6 | 14.2–16.7 | 3.2–3.5 | 3 | 7.2–11.0 | 19.5–42.2 |
| Muscle | 7 | 5–25 | 13.7–16.5 | 3.2–5.1 | 7 | 14.4–17.0 | 3.0–3.2 | 5 | 4.3–9.7 | 21.3 | |
| Twait shad | Gill | 2 | 6–9 | 14.7–16.7 | 4.2–4.3 | 2 | 14.8–17.0 | 3.3–3.6 | n.d | n.d | |
| Muscle | 2 | 6–7 | 15.8–17.1 | 3.2–3.2 | 2 | 16.7–17.9 | 3.1–3.1 | 1 | 10.3 | 14.1 | |
| Green shore crab | Muscle | 3 | 2–6 | 13.2–15.8 | 3.7–5.3 | 3 | 13.4–16.5 | 3.3–4.4 | 1 | 8.2 | n.d |
| Common cockle | Muscle | 5 | 4–5 | 11.3–12.6 | 4.1–4.9 | 5 | 11.7–12.7 | 3.7–4.3 | 2 | 6.9–7.2 | n.d |
| Pacific oyster | Muscle | 2 | 2–6 | 12.3–12.3 | 3.0–3.3 | 2 | 13.3–13.5 | 3.2–3.3 | 2 | 6.0–7.0 | n.d |
| Lugworm | Head | 2 | 3–5 | 11.7–12.4 | 4.2–4.7 | 2 | 10.8–11.3 | 3.7–4.0 | 2 | 8.4–8.5 | n.d |
| Whole | 1 | 1 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 1 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 1 | 7.4 | n.d | |
a Data from Svensson et al. [18].
n.d. = not determined.
Fig 1δ15N values of residual biomass, the total lipid extract and serine normalized to bulk biomass.
Median values (symbols) and ranges of differences in δ15N of residual biomass, the total lipid extract (TLE) and serine compared to bulk biomass (Δδ15Nfraction-bulk) for the different animals.
Fig 2LC–MS chromatogram showing identified intact polar lipids in brown trout (Salmo trutta) gill tissue.
Base peak LC–MS chromatogram (Gaussian smoothed) of MS1 of intact polar lipids (IPLs) in brown trout (Salmo trutta) gill tissue showing the prevalence of the nitrogen-containing IPL phosphatidylcholine. PC = phosphatidylcholine.
Fig 3Structures of identified intact polar lipids in lipid extracts of animal tissues.
PC = phosphocholine.
δ15N values of amino acids.
Avg and s.d. = average and standard deviation of n injections. ALA = alanine; ASP = aspartic acid; GLU = glutamic acid; GLY = glycine; ILE = isoleucine; LEU = leucine; LYS = lysine; OH-PRO = hydroxy-proline; PHE = phenylalanine; PRO = proline; SER = serine; THR = threonine; TYR = tyrosine; VAL = valine.
| Brown trout muscle | Brown trout gill | Atlantic herring muscle | Atlantic herring gill | Green shore crab | Pacific oyster | Lugworm head | Lugworm whole | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Avg | s.d. | n | Avg | s.d. | n | Avg | s.d. | n | Avg | s.d. | n | Avg | s.d. | N | Avg | s.d. | n | Avg | s.d. | n | Avg | s.d. | |
| 6 | 29.3 | 0.9 | 8 | 27.5 | 0.6 | 4 | 26.3 | 0.9 | 3 | 22.5 | 0.5 | 5 | 23.3 | 2.2 | 4 | 23.0 | 0.7 | 3 | 20.9 | 0.9 | 4 | 18.1 | 1.4 | |
| 5 | 22.6 | 1.1 | 8 | 21.4 | 0.7 | 3 | 21.7 | 0.7 | 3 | 18.0 | 0.9 | 5 | 20.2 | 1.3 | 4 | 19.9 | 0.3 | 3 | 20.0 | 1.7 | 4 | 18.2 | 1.2 | |
| 6 | 26.5 | 0.7 | 8 | 27.2 | 0.5 | 4 | 26.6 | 1.0 | 3 | 23.9 | 0.5 | 5 | 24.1 | 0.9 | 4 | 22.7 | 0.2 | 3 | 19.4 | 1.1 | 4 | 17.4 | 0.9 | |
| 6 | 7.6 | 0.8 | 8 | 8.8 | 0.3 | 4 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 3 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 5 | 10.0 | 1.4 | 4 | 9.8 | 0.6 | 3 | 9.9 | 0.9 | 4 | 9.1 | 1.0 | |
| 5 | 26.0 | 0.8 | 5 | 25.7 | 0.6 | 3 | 25.7 | 0.1 | n.d. | 5 | 18.3 | 1.8 | 4 | 19.1 | 0.7 | 3 | 16.7 | 0.7 | 2 | 16.2 | 1.4 | |||
| 6 | 26.3 | 0.7 | 8 | 26.9 | 0.8 | 4 | 25.8 | 0.7 | 3 | 21.9 | 1.1 | 5 | 19.8 | 1.9 | 4 | 19.1 | 0.8 | 3 | 17.7 | 0.5 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.8 | |
| 6 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 8 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 4 | 5.0 | 0.4 | n.d. | n.d. | 4 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 3 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 2 | 2.1 | 0.2 | |||||
| n.d. | 8 | 22.9 | 0.9 | n.d. | 3 | 20.5 | 1.8 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | |||||||||||||
| 6 | 8.6 | 0.9 | 6 | 9.9 | 0.8 | 3 | 7.6 | 1.1 | 3 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 5 | 8.9 | 1.0 | 4 | 11.7 | 0.7 | 3 | 9.3 | 0.8 | 2 | 11.0 | 0.5 | |
| n.d. | 6 | 27.6 | 0.7 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | |||||||||||||||
| 3 | 7.7 | 0.5 | 6 | 8.4 | 0.7 | 3 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 2 | 8.3 | 0.5 | 2 | 10.7 | 1.6 | 4 | 10.3 | 0.9 | 3 | 8.4 | 1.5 | 2 | 8.8 | 1.0 | |
| 5 | -15.3 | 3.2 | 2 | -22.2 | 0.0 | 3 | -17.5 | 2.4 | n.d. | 1 | -4.7 | 1 | 4.6 | 2 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 2 | 3.0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 6 | 15.5 | 1.5 | 8 | 15.5 | 0.7 | 4 | 14.0 | 0.9 | 3 | 8.7 | 0.8 | 5 | 11.4 | 0.5 | 4 | 15.0 | 1.1 | 3 | 11.3 | 0.3 | 2 | 11.6 | 0.9 | |
| 7 | 27.6 | 0.9 | 8 | 28.5 | 1.4 | 4 | 27.2 | 1.2 | 3 | 23.2 | 1.1 | 5 | 21.2 | 2.3 | 4 | 22.4 | 0.5 | 3 | 19.6 | 1.2 | 4 | 18.5 | 2.3 | |
n.d. = not detected.
Fig 4Difference in δ15N of lipid extracts (TLE) and bulk biomass (Δδ15NTLE-bulk) plotted against trophic levels.
Δδ15NTLE-bulk data points represent averages of several individuals with the error bar reflecting the standard deviation of multiple individuals (S1 Table). Trophic level data points are plotted as averages (with error) of replicate analysis of amino acids of a single individual. Trophic levels were calculated according to Chikaraishi et al [29] using δ15N values of the amino acids phenylalanine and glutamic acid.