| Literature DB >> 26730951 |
Jailson F Moura1, Esteban Acevedo-Trejos1, Davi C Tavares2,3, Ana C O Meirelles4, Cristine P N Silva4, Larissa R Oliveira5,6, Roberta A Santos7, Janaína C Wickert5,8, Rodrigo Machado5,9, Salvatore Siciliano3, Agostino Merico1,10.
Abstract
The genus Kogia, which comprises only two extant species, Kogia sima and Kogia breviceps, represents one of the least known groups of cetaceans in the global ocean. In some coastal regions, however, stranding events of these species have been relatively common over the last decades. Stranding provides the opportunity to investigate the biology of these cetaceans and to explore the epidemiological aspects associated with the mortality of the organisms found on the beach. A number of disturbances (including pelagic fisheries, chemical pollution, boat strikes, and noise pollution) have been confirmed to pose a particular threat to the Kogia species. However, no study has yet investigated potential relationships between environmental conditions and stranding events. Here we analyse how a collection of environmental, physical, and biological variables, such as wind, sea surface temperature (SST), water depth, and chlorophyll-a, correlate to Kogia stranding events along the Brazilian coast. The results of our statistical analyses suggest that K. sima is more likely found in warm tropical waters, which provide an explanation for the high frequency of stranding in northeastern Brazilian coast. In contrast, K. breviceps appears to have a preference for temperate and productive waters. Wind speed results to be also an important factor for predicting Kogia strandings in Brazilian coast. Additionally, literature information in combination with our own data and analyses of stomach contents confirms that oceanic cephalopods constitute the primary nutritional source of both Kogia species. By using the available information as a qualitative proxy for habitat preference and feeding ecology, our study provides a novel and comprehensive assessment of Kogia stranding data in relation to environmental conditions along the Brazilian coast.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26730951 PMCID: PMC4701718 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Synoptic map.
Panel A shows the spatial distribution of stranding events of the Kogia whales (42 and 58 for K. breviceps and K. sima, respectively) from 1965 to 2014, the latitudinal sampling boxes (dashed white squares), from where we extracted mean values of environmental variables, adjacent to stranding zones, and important sites (RCB = Royal Charlotte Bank; AB = Abrolhos Bank; CF = Cabo Frio; CSMG = Cabo de Santa Marta Grande). Panel B shows the monthly occurrences of stranding events and panel C shows the number of strandings adjacent to the sampling boxes.
Fig 2Principal Component Analysis.
Panel A shows the ordination biplot. The arrows indicate the loadings on the respective PCs. The length of the arrows indicates the power of the relationship and the angle between two arrows provides the degree of correlation between the corresponding variables. Panels B and C show barplots of the loadings illustrating the sign and the strength of the relationships between variables and first (B) and second (C) PCs.
Fig 3Probabilistic model fits.
Each panel includes stranding data (blue dots), probabilistic fits based on Generalized Linear Models (red lines), 95% confidence intervals of the fit (shadowed yellow areas) respective p-values (significance at p < 0.05, showed in boldface). The check mark symbols indicate the relevant variables of the selected predictive GLM models for K. breviceps (KB), K. sima (KS) and for total number of strandings (TN, both species combined).
Summary statistics for preferred model fits.
A series of models with associated Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) indices are reported along with parameters estimates for intercept “α” and slope “β”, their respective standard error, and p-values (* indicates p < 0.05).
| Species | AIC | Parameter | Estimate ± SE | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.709 | α | -10.9993 ± 4.6259 | 0.0174* | |
| βWspe | 0.8795 ± 0.3004 | 0.0034* | ||
| βChl-a | 6.1791 ± 3.1823 | 0.0521 | ||
| βSST | 0.2255 ± 0.1221 | 0.0648 | ||
| 45.666 | α | -4.1109 ± 1.9254 | 0.0328* | |
| βWspe | 0.6108 ± 0.2916 | 0.0362* | ||
| βChl-a | 5.0874 ± 2.1536 | 0.0182* | ||
| 61.336 | α | -1.0270 ± 3.9640 | 0.0096* | |
| βWspe | 0.8632 ± 0.3226 | 0.0074* | ||
| βSST | 0.2622 ± 0.1076 | 0.0148* | ||
| βdepth | 0.00039 ± 0.00026 | 0.1322 |
Food items recovered from the stomach of a stranded pygmy sperm whale (K. breviceps).
FN% = (number of preys of one species x 100) / (number of preys of all species); ML = mantle length; WT = weight.
| Family | Species | (N) | ML (mm) | WT (g) | FN% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean | range | mean | range | ||||
| 5 | 265.4 | 261.4–269.5 | 356.5 | 333.5–379.6 | 8.93 | ||
| 5 | 129.9 | 109.3–158.0 | 673 | 357.2–1150.1 | 8,93 | ||
| 2 | 97.5 | -- | 202.7 | -- | 3.57 | ||
| 5 | 38.4 | 30.8–39.7 | 36.7 | 24.4–67.2 | 8.93 | ||
| 3 | 144.8 | 131.9–156.6 | 38.8 | 31.2–46.1 | 5.36 | ||
| 1 | 343.6 | -- | 735.9 | -- | 1.78 | ||
| 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1.78 | ||
| 2 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3.57 | ||
| 12 | 234.0 | 106.2–283.4 | 61.4 | 12.3–81.9 | 21.42 | ||
| 1 | -- | -- | -- | --- | 1.78 | ||
| 7 | 103.9 | 94.6–109.2 | 28.8 | 21.4–33.2 | 12.50 | ||
| 2 | 116.6 | 110.5–122.6 | 97.6 | 86.0–109.3 | 3.57 | ||
| Oegopsina unidentified | 10 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 17.86 | |
Literature information concerning cephalopod prey species recovered in stomach contents of K. sima and K. breviceps stranded along the Brazilian coast.
| Family of prey species | Prey species | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y | - | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| Y | - | [ | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [TS] | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| Y | - | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [TS] | ||
| - | Y | [TS] | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [ | ||
| Y | Y | [TS] | ||
| Unknown | Y | - | [ | |
| - | Y | [TS] | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [TS] | ||
| Y | - | [ | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [ | ||
| - | Y | [TS] |
TS = This Study; Y = Yes.