Saskia Den Boon1, Alberto Matteelli, Nathan Ford, Haileyesus Getahun. 1. aIndependent Consultant bThe Global TB Programme, World Health Organization cDepartment of HIV and Global Hepatitis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was carried out to determine the effectiveness of continuous isoniazid (given for at least 36 months) for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in people living with HIV (PLHIV). METHODS: Six databases and HIV and tuberculosis (TB) conference abstract books were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared the effectiveness of continuous isoniazid with 6 months of isoniazid. Outcomes of interest were TB incidence, mortality, adverse events and risk of drug resistance. Data were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Three studies were included, from Botswana, South Africa and India. The risk of active TB was 38% lower among patients receiving continuous isoniazid compared with isoniazid regimen for 6 months [relative risk (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.89; I = 0%], and 49% lower for those with a positive tuberculin skin test (TST) (RR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.30-0.86; I = 7%). Similarly, individuals with positive TST had a 50% lower chance of death (RR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27-0.91; I = 3%). Two studies found no evidence of an increase in adverse events in the continuous isoniazid group, whereas a third study, that used a different definition for adverse events, found strong evidence of increase. There was no evidence of increased drug resistance when continuous isoniazid was given. CONCLUSION: For PLHIV in settings with high TB and HIV prevalence and transmission, continuous isoniazid for at least 36 months is beneficial and probably outweighs the risk of increased adverse events compared with an isoniazid regimen for 6 months.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was carried out to determine the effectiveness of continuous isoniazid (given for at least 36 months) for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in people living with HIV (PLHIV). METHODS: Six databases and HIV and tuberculosis (TB) conference abstract books were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared the effectiveness of continuous isoniazid with 6 months of isoniazid. Outcomes of interest were TB incidence, mortality, adverse events and risk of drug resistance. Data were pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Three studies were included, from Botswana, South Africa and India. The risk of active TB was 38% lower among patients receiving continuous isoniazid compared with isoniazid regimen for 6 months [relative risk (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.89; I = 0%], and 49% lower for those with a positive tuberculin skin test (TST) (RR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.30-0.86; I = 7%). Similarly, individuals with positive TST had a 50% lower chance of death (RR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27-0.91; I = 3%). Two studies found no evidence of an increase in adverse events in the continuous isoniazid group, whereas a third study, that used a different definition for adverse events, found strong evidence of increase. There was no evidence of increased drug resistance when continuous isoniazid was given. CONCLUSION: For PLHIV in settings with high TB and HIV prevalence and transmission, continuous isoniazid for at least 36 months is beneficial and probably outweighs the risk of increased adverse events compared with an isoniazid regimen for 6 months.
Authors: Jonathan E Golub; Silvia Cohn; Valeria Saraceni; Solange C Cavalcante; Antonio G Pacheco; Lawrence H Moulton; Betina Durovni; Richard E Chaisson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Taraz Samandari; Tefera B Agizew; Samba Nyirenda; Zegabriel Tedla; Thabisa Sibanda; Nong Shang; Barudi Mosimaneotsile; Oaitse I Motsamai; Lorna Bozeman; Margarett K Davis; Elizabeth A Talbot; Themba L Moeti; Howard J Moffat; Peter H Kilmarx; Kenneth G Castro; Charles D Wells Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Neil A Martinson; Grace L Barnes; Lawrence H Moulton; Reginah Msandiwa; Harry Hausler; Malathi Ram; James A McIntyre; Glenda E Gray; Richard E Chaisson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: I Pathmanathan; S Ahmedov; E Pevzner; G Anyalechi; S Modi; H Kirking; J S Cavanaugh Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Emily A Kendall; Andrew S Azman; Gary Maartens; Andrew Boulle; Robert J Wilkinson; David W Dowdy; Molebogeng X Rangaka Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Giorgia Sulis; Rosella Centis; Giovanni Sotgiu; Lia D'Ambrosio; Emanuele Pontali; Antonio Spanevello; Alberto Matteelli; Alimuddin Zumla; Giovanni Battista Migliori Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Andreas Sandgren; Jannigje M Vonk Noordegraaf-Schouten; Anouk M Oordt-Speets; Gerarda B van Kessel; Sake J de Vlas; Marieke J van der Werf Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2016-08-25
Authors: Anthony D Harries; Ajay M V Kumar; Srinath Satyanarayana; Pruthu Thekkur; Yan Lin; Riitta A Dlodlo; Mohammed Khogali; Rony Zachariah Journal: Trop Med Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-16
Authors: Anthony D Harries; Yan Lin; Ajay M V Kumar; Srinath Satyanarayana; Kudakwashe C Takarinda; Riitta A Dlodlo; Rony Zachariah; Piero Olliaro Journal: F1000Res Date: 2018-07-05