Literature DB >> 26730337

Auraptene consolidates memory, reverses scopolamine-disrupted memory in passive avoidance task, and ameliorates retention deficits in mice.

Kaveh Tabrizian1, Najmeh Sadat Yaghoobi2, Mehrdad Iranshahi3, Jafar Shahraki2, Ramin Rezaee4, Mahmoud Hashemzaei2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Auraptene (7-geranyloxycoumarin) (AUR), from Citrus species has shown anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and beta-secretase inhibitory effects. Scopolamine is a nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist which causes short-term memory impairments and is used for inducing animal model of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This research aimed to investigate the effect of AUR on scopolamine-induced avoidance memory retention deficits in step-through task in mice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of four-day pre-training injections of AUR (50, 75, and 100 mg/kg, subcutaneous (SC)) and scopolamine (1 mg/kg, IP), and their co-administration on avoidance memory retention in step-through passive avoidance task, was investigated by measuring the latency to enter to the dark chamber.
RESULTS: Pre-training administration of AUR caused significant increase in step-through latency in comparison with control group, 48, 96, and 168 hr after training trial. The findings of this study showed that scopolamine (1 mg/kg, IP, for four consecutive days) impaired passive avoidance memory retention compared to saline-treated animals. Step-through passive avoidance task results showed that AUR markedly reversed scopolamine-induced avoidance memory retention impairments, 24 and 168 hr after training trial in step-through task.
CONCLUSION: Results from co-administration of AUR and scopolamine showed that AUR reversed scopolamine-induced passive avoidance memory retention impairments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auraptene; Avoidance memory retention; Mice; Scopolamine; Shuttle box

Year:  2015        PMID: 26730337      PMCID: PMC4686572     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 2008-3866            Impact factor:   2.699


Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease especially among elderly people. Aging is the most important etiological factor in AD which is rapidly becoming very common all around the world especially in industrialized countries. Two major hallmarks of AD are β-amyloid plaques deposition and cholinergic system down-regulation. Beta-secretase is an enzyme involved in the cleavage of amyloid beta protein precursor (APP) into β-amyloid and the production of β-amyloid plaques. Multiple neurotransmitter systems seem to be affected in AD. One of these systems is brain cholinergic system that has been implicated in the pathophysiology and treatment of memory deficits (1-4). Auraptene (7-geranyloxycoumarin) (AUR) is a coumarin derivative which could be found in a variety of citrus fruits. Several studies have mentioned valuable properties of AUR such as anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenesis effects in peripheral tissues. Furthermore, AUR exhibits multiple protective activities in the brain including neurotrophic, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and beta-secretase inhibitory effects, and strong antioxidant activity. Moreover, AUR can suppress microglia activation in the hippocampus and inhibit N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced neurotoxicity (5-12). In addition, AUR has shown neurotrophic activity in PC12 cell line via activation of ERK1/2 and promotion of neurite outgrowth (12). It has also protective effects against brain global ischemia in mice through inhibition of inflammation, the main cause of cognitive defects. Naturally occurring coumarins inhibit beta-secretase enzyme which is regarded as a valuable therapeutic target for the treatment of AD (7, 8). Scopolamine is a nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist. It decreases acetylcholine level in the hippocampus and causes learning acquisition deficits, which make it a useful pharmacological tool to induce a partial model of the AD (13). This study assessed the effects of AUR on the cognitive performance of scopolamine-treated animals. As AUR was found to cause dose-dependent neuroprotective effects, different doses of AUR (50, 75, and 100 mg/kg, subcutaneous (SC)) were chosen to investigate its effects on scopolamine-induced avoidance memory retention deficits in step-through passive avoidance task in mice.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Adult male mice (30-35 g, n=7) were obtained from Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran, and housed at normal ambient temperature (22-23 °C) with a 12:12 hr light:dark cycle. Animals were trained and tested during the light period. All methods used in this study were in accordance with Helsinki declaration.

Drugs

AUR was provided by Dr. Iranshahi, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Briefly, it was synthesized through the reaction of 7-hydroxy-coumarin (1 M) with trans-geranyl bromide (1.5 M) in acetone, at room temperature. The reaction was done in the presence of 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) (2M). The resulting mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by column chromatography using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (9:1, v/v) to produce white crystals (9). To provide injection preparation, AUR was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/polyethylene glycol (PEG) 300 (1:1) solutions (10). Scopolamine was purchased from Sigma (St Luis, MO, USA) and dissolved in sodium chloride 0.9%.

Apparatus; passive avoidance training and testing

One-trial passive avoidance learning task was selected as the tool for behavioral assessment to measure associative memory retention in mice. For this purpose, an apparatus consisted of two identical illuminated and non-illuminated boxes was used. At first, all animals were allowed to habituate in the experimental chamber without shock and mice with no tendency to enter the dark room were excluded. For the acquisition trial, animals were placed individually in the illuminated compartment of automated passive avoidance system (UgoBasile, Comerio, Italy). The apparatus was activated by pressing the pedal. The guillotine door was raised after 10 sec allowing the animal to enter the dark compartment. After that, the guillotine door was closed and animals were given an inescapable foot-shock (0.2 mA), for 2 sec (on training day). The retention tests were conducted 24, 48, 96, and 168 hr after the training session (without shock). The latency time (cut off 300 sec) to enter the dark compartment was recorded.

Experiment 1

In this part, effects of AUR were assessed by passive avoidance task. Animals were treated with AUR (50, 75, and 100 mg/kg, SC) for four consecutive days. On the 4th day, 30 min after the last injection, animals were trained in step-through passive avoidance task and 24, 48, 96, and 168 hr after the training, passive avoidance memory retention was assessed. Control animals received DMSO/PEG 300 (1:1) (AUR was dissolved in DMSO/PEG) and tested in the same manner.

Experiment 2

Here, scopolamine (1 mg/kg, IP) was administered for four consecutive days. At the end of the 4th day and 30 min after the last injection, animals were trained in step-through passive avoidance task and 24, 48, 96, and 168 hr after the training, passive avoidance memory retention was evaluated. Control animals received saline (scopolamine was dissolved in saline) and tested in the same manner. Finally, effects of AUR on scopolamine-induced memory impairment were assessed. At first, AUR (50, 75, and 100 mg/kg, SC) was injected and 15 min later, scopolamine (1 mg/kg, IP) was administered. AUR and scopolamine were administered for four consecutive days. However, 30 min after the last injection, animals were trained in step-through passive avoidance task and 24, 48, 96, and 168 hr after the training, passive avoidance memory retention was assessed.

Data analysis

Data are expressed as means±SEM and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). For multiple comparisons, Newman–Keuls post–hoc test was used. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

Pre-training administration effects of AUR on passive avoidance memory retention in step-through task in mice

Four-days pre-training administration of AUR (50, 75, and 100 mg/kg, SC) caused significant increase in step-through latency in comparison with control group after 48 (Figure 1B), 96 (Figure 1C), and 168 hr (Figure 1D).
Figure 1

(A-D). Pre-training effects of auraptene (AUR) administration (4 days, SC) on avoidance memory retention after 24 (A), 48 (B), 96 (C), and 168 hr (D) in step-through passive avoidance task. Each value represents the mean±SEM for 7 mice. *P<0.0.5, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 show significant differences from control [DMSO/PEG 300 (1:1)] group

(A-D). Pre-training effects of auraptene (AUR) administration (4 days, SC) on avoidance memory retention after 24 (A), 48 (B), 96 (C), and 168 hr (D) in step-through passive avoidance task. Each value represents the mean±SEM for 7 mice. *P<0.0.5, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 show significant differences from control [DMSO/PEG 300 (1:1)] group

The effects of AUR on scopolamine-induced avoidance memory retention impairments in step-through task in mice

The results showed that pre-training administra-tion of scopolamine (1 mg/kg, IP, for four consecutive days) impaired passive avoidance memory retention in step-through task. There were significant differences between scopolamine and control (saline-treated) animals, 24 (Figure 2A, P<0.001), 48 (Figure 2B, P<0.05), 96 (Figure 2C, P<0.01), and 168 hr (Figure 2D, P<0.001) after training trial in step-through task.
Figure 2

(A–D). The effects of auraptene (AUR) on scopolamine–induced memory retention impairments in step-through task after 24 (A), 48 (B), 96 (C), and 168 hr (D). * P<0.05 and **P<0.01 show significant differences from control (saline-treated) animals. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, and ###P<0.001 show significant differences from scopolamine–treated group. Each value represents the mean±SEM for 7 mice

(A–D). The effects of auraptene (AUR) on scopolamine–induced memory retention impairments in step-through task after 24 (A), 48 (B), 96 (C), and 168 hr (D). * P<0.05 and **P<0.01 show significant differences from control (saline-treated) animals. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, and ###P<0.001 show significant differences from scopolamine–treated group. Each value represents the mean±SEM for 7 mice AUR (50, 75, and 100 mg/kg, SC) was administered 15 min before scopolamine (1 mg/kg, IP) for four consecutive days. Step-through passive avoidance task results showed that AUR markedly reversed scopolamine-induced avoidance memory retention impairments, 24 (Figure 2A) and 168 hr (Figure 2D) after training trial in step-through task.

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the effects of AUR on scopolamine-induced avoidance memory retention impairment in the passive avoidance task in mice. Our results showed that administration of scopolamine (1 mg/kg, IP) for four consecutive days, induced impairment of passive avoidance retention which was able to impair retention memory processes. We found that AUR can consolidate memory and reverse avoidance memory impairment induced by scopolamine. Central and peripheral modification of neurotransmission is involved in learning ability. It has been suggested that cholinergic system plays an important role in learning and memory processes. Scopolamine is a nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist that induces senile and Alzheimer-type dementia (14, 15). It has been reported that AUR has strong antioxidant effects (10). Many studies confirmed that AUR also has antioxidant effects on central nervous system as well as peripheral tissues. It has been already found that AUR can suppress microglial activation and ameliorate expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in astrocytes in the hippocampus following brain ischemia (10). Memory consolidating effects are not solely mediated via antioxidant and free radical scavenging effects of AUR, but it has been reported that inhibition of COX-2 enzyme protects delayed neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease (16-18). In addition, AUR has shown neuroprotective effects against NMDA-induced neuro-degeneration (5). Also, AUR potentiates central muscarinic cholinergic system. It was cleared that muscarinic system is one of the most important systems involved in memory especially in acquisition and cognition. It has been shown that AUR inhibits AChE enzyme moderately. Cholinergic hypothesis is the most widely accepted theory of AD development (19-21). The beta-secretase enzyme has been recognized as a valuable target for the treatment of AD. This enzyme is known to be incorporated in the production of amyloid beta plaques via cleavage of amyloid beta protein precursor. Beta-secretase inhibitors are strongly related to drugs that have been used for the treatment of AD. A study done by Marumoto and colleagues showed that naturally occurring coumarins like AUR at different concentrations inhibit beta-secretase (8, 7). cAMP has an important role in the long-term potentiation (LTP) via activation of cAMP response element binding (CREB) through protein synthesis (22). Activated CREB recruits the CREB binding protein (CBP) to the promoter regions of cAMP-responsive genes associated with growth of dendrite, changing morphology, improving synaptic plasticity, and long-term memory (12, 23). It is known that AUR strongly induces ERK1/2, consequently phosphorylates CREB in PC12 cell line and cortical neuronal cell line, resulting in memory consolidation (12). AUR has anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensive, antioxidant, anti-bacterial, and immunomodulatory effects (5, 24-30). Inflammation is implicated in the progress of neurodegenerative diseases including AD and Parkinson’s disease (18). The other possible mechanisms for memory consolidating effects of AUR are modulation of estrogen receptor (ER) and inhibition of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT). Based on the ACAT enzyme inhibitory and ER modulatory effects of AUR, Medina et al suggested that AUR could be considered as a useful agent in the treatment of AD (31).

Conclusion

Our study showed that AUR reverses scopolamine-induced avoidance memory retention deficits in step-through task in mice. Findings of this study suggest that AUR may restore memory processes partly via modulation of cholinergic pathways.
  28 in total

1.  Post-training intrahippocampal infusion of nicotine prevents spatial memory retention deficits induced by the cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor celecoxib in rats.

Authors:  Mohammad Sharifzadeh; Mahtab Tavasoli; Nasser Naghdi; Azam Ghanbari; Mohsen Amini; Ali Roghani
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 5.372

2.  Auraptene is an inhibitor of cholesterol esterification and a modulator of estrogen receptors.

Authors:  Philippe de Medina; Salvatore Genovese; Michael R Paillasse; Mahta Mazaheri; Stephanie Caze-Subra; Kerstin Bystricky; Massimo Curini; Sandrine Silvente-Poirot; Francesco Epifano; Marc Poirot
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity by essential oil from Citrus paradisi.

Authors:  M Miyazawa; H Tougo; M Ishihara
Journal:  Nat Prod Lett       Date:  2001

4.  A comparison of scopolamine and biperiden as a rodent model for cholinergic cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Inge Klinkenberg; Arjan Blokland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition prevents delayed death of CA1 hippocampal neurons following global ischemia.

Authors:  M Nakayama; K Uchimura; R L Zhu; T Nagayama; M E Rose; R A Stetler; P C Isakson; J Chen; S H Graham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Auraptene from Ferula szowitsiana protects human peripheral lymphocytes against oxidative stress.

Authors:  Fatemeh Soltani; Fatemeh Mosaffa; Mehrdad Iranshahi; Gholamreza Karimi; Mohammad Malekaneh; Fatemeh Haghighi; Javad Behravan
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.878

7.  Neuroprotective effect of prenyloxycoumarins from edible vegetables.

Authors:  Francesco Epifano; Gemma Molinaro; Salvatore Genovese; Richard Teke Ngomba; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Massimo Curini
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Synthesis and SAR studies of mono O-prenylated coumarins as potent 15-lipoxygenase inhibitors.

Authors:  Mehrdad Iranshahi; Atena Jabbari; Ala Orafaie; Robabeh Mehri; Soudabeh Zeraatkar; Taraneh Ahmadi; Maliheh Alimardani; Hamid Sadeghian
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Isolation and characterization of activators of ERK/MAPK from citrus plants.

Authors:  Yoshiko Furukawa; Satoshi Okuyama; Yoshiaki Amakura; Sono Watanabe; Takahiro Fukata; Mitsunari Nakajima; Morio Yoshimura; Takashi Yoshida
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Cytotoxic activities of phytochemicals from Ferula species.

Authors:  Seied Mojtaba Valiahdi; Mehrdad Iranshahi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  4 in total

1.  Curcumin improves D-galactose and normal-aging associated memory impairment in mice: In vivo and in silico-based studies.

Authors:  Md Ashrafur Rahman; Arif Anzum Shuvo; Asim Kumar Bepari; Mehedi Hasan Apu; Manik Chandra Shill; Murad Hossain; Mohammed Uddin; Md Rabiul Islam; Monjurul Kader Bakshi; Javed Hasan; Atiqur Rahman; Ghazi Mohammad Sayedur Rahman; Hasan Mahmud Reza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and immunomodulatory activities of the genus Ferula and their constituents: A review.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemi; Ramin Rezaee; Mohammad Reza Aslani; Mohammad Hossein Boskabady
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Cognitive and biological effects of citrus phytochemicals in subjective cognitive decline: a 36-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Samantha Galluzzi; Roberta Zanardini; Clarissa Ferrari; Sara Gipponi; Ilaria Passeggia; Michela Rampini; Giovanni Sgrò; Salvatore Genovese; Serena Fiorito; Lucia Palumbo; Michela Pievani; Giovanni B Frisoni; Francesco Epifano
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 4.344

4.  Anticancer and apoptosis‑inducing effects of quercetin in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Mahmoud Hashemzaei; Amin Delarami Far; Arezoo Yari; Reza Entezari Heravi; Kaveh Tabrizian; Seyed Mohammad Taghdisi; Sarvenaz Ekhtiari Sadegh; Konstantinos Tsarouhas; Dimitrios Kouretas; George Tzanakakis; Dragana Nikitovic; Nikita Yurevich Anisimov; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristides M Tsatsakis; Ramin Rezaee
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.906

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.