Literature DB >> 26730058

A New Cost-effective Method of NPWT in Diabetic Foot Wound.

Nikunj Vaidhya1, Arpit Panchal2, M M Anchalia1.   

Abstract

Diabetic foot wounds present a great challenge to surgeons. They are difficult to heal and are a significant risk factor for non-traumatic foot amputation besides being a huge financial burden. NPWT systems commercially available (VAC™ system, KCI Inc., USA) are costly precluding widespread use. To determine whether negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) would afford quicker wound recovery as compared to saline-moistened gauze in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds. Sixty patients were randomized into either the experimental NPWT group or conventional dressing group (control). All patients were given medical therapy for diabetes and antibiotics given according to culture and sensitivity patterns. All foot ulcers were surgically debrided prior to initiation of NPWT or conventional treatment. In the NPWT group, dressings were changed every 48-72 h. In the control group, conventional dressings were applied at the time of surgical debridement and changed twice a day thereafter. End point of study was when wound was ready for either skin grafting or secondary suturing. End point was achieved in the NPWT group in 17.2(SD ± 3.55) days, compared to 34.9 (SD ± 5.96) days in the control group (p < 0.001). Number of dressing applied were 7.46(SD ± 2.25) in NPWT group versus 69.8(SD ± 11.93) in conventional dressing group (p < 0.001). Ninety percent cases were successfully treated in NPWT Group as compared to 76.6 % in conventional group. Rate of healing of ulcer is faster in NPWT group as compared to conventional group. Economically modified NPWT is more cost-effective to the patients in our setup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effective; Dressing; Improvised; Negative-pressure wound therapy

Year:  2013        PMID: 26730058      PMCID: PMC4692901          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-0907-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  16 in total

1.  The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients.

Authors:  T E Philbeck; K T Whittington; M H Millsap; R B Briones; D G Wight; W J Schroeder
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  [Treatment of infection by vacuum sealing].

Authors:  W Fleischmann; E Lang; M Russ
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy with off-the-shelf components.

Authors:  Trung D Bui; Sergio Huerta; Ian L Gordon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Evidence-based protocol for diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Harold Brem; Peter Sheehan; Harvey J Rosenberg; Jillian S Schneider; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Our experience with a "homemade" vacuum-assisted closure system.

Authors:  Avshalom Shalom; Hadad Eran; Melvyn Westreich; Tal Friedman
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2008 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 0.892

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Wound edge microvascular blood flow during negative-pressure wound therapy: examining the effects of pressures from -10 to -175 mmHg.

Authors:  Ola Borgquist; Richard Ingemansson; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience.

Authors:  L C Argenta; M J Morykwas
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  An economic evaluation of the use of TNP on full-thickness wounds.

Authors:  C M Mouës; G J C M van den Bemd; W J Meerding; S E R Hovius
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.072

10.  Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter A Blume; Jodi Walters; Wyatt Payne; Jose Ayala; John Lantis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  A solution for complex wounds: the evidence for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation.

Authors:  Ersilia L Anghel; Paul J Kim; Christopher E Attinger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers with Elevated Protease Activity: A Case Series.

Authors:  Valentina Izzo; Marco Meloni; Laura Giurato; Valeria Ruotolo; Luigi Uccioli
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Zhenmi Liu; Jo C Dumville; Robert J Hinchliffe; Nicky Cullum; Fran Game; Nikki Stubbs; Michael Sweeting; Frank Peinemann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-17

Review 4.  Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for patients with diabetic foot ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Liu; Chao-Zhu He; Yan-Ting Cai; Qiu-Ping Xing; Ying-Zhen Guo; Zhi-Long Chen; Ji-Liang Su; Li-Ping Yang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Comparison of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy and Conventional Dressing on Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sangma M D James; Sathasivam Sureshkumar; Thirthar P Elamurugan; Naik Debasis; Chellappa Vijayakumar; Chinnakali Palanivel
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Jun

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy in patients with wounds healing by secondary intention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Yvonne Zens; Michael Barth; Heiner C Bucher; Katrin Dreck; Moritz Felsch; Wolfram Groß; Thomas Jaschinski; Heike Kölsch; Mandy Kromp; Inga Overesch; Stefan Sauerland; Sven Gregor
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-10

7.  NPWT resource use compared with standard moist wound care in diabetic foot wounds: DiaFu randomized clinical trial results.

Authors:  Dörthe Seidel; Rolf Lefering
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  The effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy as a novel management of diabetic foot ulcers: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Shahrzad Mohseni; Maryam Aalaa; Rasha Atlasi; Mohamad Reza Mohajeri Tehrani; Mahnaz Sanjari; Mohamad Reza Amini
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2019-11-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.