Literature DB >> 26730025

Impact of the Increased Use of Preoperative Imaging and Laparoscopy on Appendicectomy Outcomes.

A N Sridhar1, M Andrikopoulou1, L Clarke1, C Ashley1, P Mekhail1, U A Khan1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of appendicitis is based on clinical picture. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse variation of outcomes and impact of increasing use of radiological investigations and laparoscopy over a 5-year period. A retrospective audit of appendicectomies over the last 5 years (01 January 2007-31 December 2011) was conducted. The negative appendicectomy rate (NAR), perforation rate and complication rate were used as outcome endpoints. A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the difference in outcomes with surgical approach and use of radiology. One thousand fifty-five appendicectomies were performed in this period. The NAR was 22.65 % (21 % for open and 28 % for laparoscopic) and perforation rate was 14 %. There was no statistically significant difference in NAR with the use of ultrasound (P 0.3814) but there was a significant reduction in NAR with the use of computed tomography (CT) (P <0.0001). Intra-abdominal abscess (2.3 %) and wound infection (1.4 %) were the common complications with the former being higher with laparoscopy and the latter with open appendicectomy. Over 5 years, there were no significant changes in appendicectomy outcomes. The impact of diagnostic imaging on NAR varies with age, gender and the use of CT. CT can significantly reduce the negative appendicectomy rate in equivocal presentations. Complication rates vary with surgical approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicectomy; Computed tomography; Laparoscopy; Treatment outcome; Ultrasound

Year:  2013        PMID: 26730025      PMCID: PMC4692868          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-0842-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  9 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Stefan Sauerland; Thomas Jaschinski; Edmund Am Neugebauer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omer Aziz; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Sanjay Purkayastha; James Haddow; Vitali Malinovski; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; Erika Fellinger; William Reed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan Krajewski; Jacqueline Brown; P Terry Phang; Manoj Raval; Carl J Brown
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis.

Authors:  David R Flum; Thomas Koepsell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-07

7.  Patients with clinical acute appendicitis should have pre-operative full blood count and C-reactive protein assays.

Authors:  D Birchley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Current concepts in imaging of appendicitis.

Authors:  Alexander V Rybkin; Ruedi F Thoeni
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Imaging acute appendicitis: state of the art.

Authors:  Diana Gaitini
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2011-10-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.