| Literature DB >> 26729630 |
A Charnukha1,2,3, K W Post1, S Thirupathaiah2,4, D Pröpper3, S Wurmehl2, M Roslova2,5, I Morozov2,5, B Büchner2, A N Yaresko3, A V Boris3, S V Borisenko2, D N Basov1.
Abstract
Iron-based superconductors have been found to exhibit an intimate interplay of orbital, spin, and lattice degrees of freedom, dramatically affecting their low-energy electronic properties, including superconductivity. Albeit the precise pairing mechanism remains unidentified, several candidate interactions have been suggested to mediate the superconducting pairing, both in the orbital and in the spin channel. Here, we employ optical spectroscopy (OS), angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), ab initio band-structure, and Eliashberg calculations to show that nearly optimally doped NaFe0.978Co0.022As exhibits some of the strongest orbitally selective electronic correlations in the family of iron pnictides. Unexpectedly, we find that the mass enhancement of itinerant charge carriers in the strongly correlated band is dramatically reduced near the Γ point and attribute this effect to orbital mixing induced by pronounced spin-orbit coupling. Embracing the true band structure allows us to describe all low-energy electronic properties obtained in our experiments with remarkable consistency and demonstrate that superconductivity in this material is rather weak and mediated by spin fluctuations.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26729630 PMCID: PMC4700462 DOI: 10.1038/srep18620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Low-energy electronic properties of NaFe0.978Co0.022As.
(a,b) Low-energy electronic structure of in the normal state near the Γ ((a) 30 K) and M ((b) 22 K) points of the Brillouin zone recorded using 20 eV and 25 eV photons linearly polarized perpendicular to and within the plane of incidence, respectively. The dispersion of all electronic bands observed in experiment (black solid lines) has been obtained using a multi-Lorentzian fit of the momentum-distribution curves. Effective-mass renormalization indicated in the panels has been calculated by comparing the low-energy parabolic fits to the electronic dispersions extracted from the experimental data (dashed lines in panels (a,b)) with those to the corresponding electronic bands predicted theoretically (dashed lines in panel (c)). (c) Theoretically predicted low-energy electronic band structure of NaFeAs in the high-symmetry direction of the Brillouin zone (black solid lines) and low-energy parabolic fits to the dispersions near Γ and M (dashed lines). The colors of the dashed lines correspond to those in panels (a,b). Plasma frequencies of all bands crossing the Fermi level extracted from experimental data and predicted by theory are shown in panels (a–c). (d) Electronic band structure in the high-symmetry direction of the Brillouin zone near the Γ point obtained in a relativistic DFT calculation (black lines), which explicitly accounts for a finite spin-orbit coupling (its characteristic energy scale is shown as blue hatched area). The results of the corresponding non-relativistic calculation from panel c are shown for comparison (grey lines). (e) Energy dependence of the effective mass renormalization in the outer (blue open circles), middle (grey circles), and inner (red circles) hole band at the Γ point with respect to the corresponding low-energy quasiparticle masses extracted from the theoretically predicted band structure in panel (c) using parabolic fits. The energy scale affected by spin-orbit interaction is indicated as a blue hatched area. (f,g) Real part of the optical conductivity (f) and the dielectric function (g) of obtained in OS measurements (open circles) along with the results of a Drude-Lorentz dispersion analysis (blue and red lines/shaded areas and green line/shaded area for the two Drude terms and the total contribution of all interband transitions, respectively; gray solid lines indicate the sum of all terms). The parameters of the itinerant charge carrier response obtained by means of this analysis are summarized in panel (g).
Figure 2Superconductivity in nearly optimally doped NaFe0.978Co0.022As.
(a) Relative change in the sample reflectance as a function of temperature for several frequencies in the THz spectral range. The transition into the superconducting state is evidenced by a marked increase in the sample reflectance below (vertical dashed line). (b) Real part of the itinerant THz and far-infrared conductivity of in the superconducting state at 8 K (blue solid line) and normal state at 20 and 30 K (red and black solid lines, respectively). The formation of Cooper pairs is manifested in the missing area under the conductivity curve in the superconducting vs normal state (hatched area), which amounts to a London penetration depth of 430 nm. Optical superconducting energy gap 2Δ is clearly visible as the energy at which the real part of the optical conductivity vanishes. The frequency-dependence of the optical conductivity above the initial onset of absorption in the superconducting state exhibits a quasilinear character, which defines an additional energy scale, (for interpretation see text). Normal state optical conductivity is recovered at about 16Δ (vertical dashed line). (c) Comparison of the real part of the optical conductivity in the superconducting (8 K, gray open circles) and normal (20 K, gray filled circles) state obtained experimentally to the results of theoretical calculations in the framework of an effective two-band Eliashberg theory at 8 K (blue solid line) and 20 K (red solid line). Absorption below 2Δ in the superconducting state is due to thermally excited quasiparticles. All parameters of the theory are indicated in the panel. The initial sharp onset of absorption at 2Δ is assisted by elastic impurity scattering while the quasilinear frequency dependence of the optical conductivity at higher energies results from Holstein processes (breaking of a Cooper pair with a simultaneous creation of one or several quanta of the mediating boson). (d) The spectral function of the mediating boson in the normal (25 K) and superconducting (5 K) state used in the calculation (red and blue solid lines, respectively) and the imaginary part of the spin susceptibility obtained using inelastic neutron scattering on the same compound (open circles; data from ref. 16). Imaginary part of the spin susceptibility in the superconducting state clearly exhibits a resonance mode at 7.5 meV and a spin gap (SG) of 5.6 meV, approximately equal to the optical superconducting energy gap 2Δ in this material.