Literature DB >> 26729284

Injectable Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels as Scaffolds for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.

Dmitry Tukmachev1,2, Serhiy Forostyak1,2, Zuzana Koci1,2, Kristyna Zaviskova1,2, Irena Vackova1, Karel Vyborny1,2, Ioanna Sandvig3,4, Axel Sandvig3,5, Christopher J Medberry6, Stephen F Badylak6, Eva Sykova1,2, Sarka Kubinova1.   

Abstract

Restoration of lost neuronal function after spinal cord injury (SCI) still remains a big challenge for current medicine. One important repair strategy is bridging the SCI lesion with a supportive and stimulatory milieu that would enable axonal rewiring. Injectable extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived hydrogels have been recently reported to have neurotrophic potential in vitro. In this study, we evaluated the presumed neuroregenerative properties of ECM hydrogels in vivo in the acute model of SCI. ECM hydrogels were prepared by decellularization of porcine spinal cord (SC) or porcine urinary bladder (UB), and injected into a spinal cord hemisection cavity. Histological analysis and real-time qPCR were performed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postinjection. Both types of hydrogels integrated into the lesion and stimulated neovascularization and axonal ingrowth into the lesion. On the other hand, massive infiltration of macrophages into the lesion and rapid hydrogel degradation did not prevent cyst formation, which progressively developed over 8 weeks. No significant differences were found between SC-ECM and UB-ECM. Gene expression analysis revealed significant downregulation of genes related to immune response and inflammation in both hydrogel types at 2 weeks post SCI. A combination of human mesenchymal stem cells with SC-ECM did not further promote ingrowth of axons and blood vessels into the lesion, when compared with the SC-ECM hydrogel alone. In conclusion, both ECM hydrogels bridged the lesion cavity, modulated the innate immune response, and provided the benefit of a stimulatory substrate for in vivo neural tissue regeneration. However, fast hydrogel degradation might be a limiting factor for the use of native ECM hydrogels in the treatment of acute SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26729284      PMCID: PMC4799710          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2015.0422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  36 in total

1.  Fractionation of an ECM hydrogel into structural and soluble components reveals distinctive roles in regulating macrophage behavior.

Authors:  P F Slivka; C L Dearth; T J Keane; F W Meng; C J Medberry; R T Riggio; J E Reing; S F Badylak
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 2.  Immune response to biologic scaffold materials.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.130

Review 3.  In the beginning there were soft collagen-cell gels: towards better 3D connective tissue models?

Authors:  Robert A Brown
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 4.  Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Buddy D Ratner; Stuart B Goodman; Salomon Amar; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  The promotion of a constructive macrophage phenotype by solubilized extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Brian M Sicari; Jenna L Dziki; Bernard F Siu; Christopher J Medberry; Christopher L Dearth; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Neurite-J: an image-J plug-in for axonal growth analysis in organotypic cultures.

Authors:  A Torres-Espín; D Santos; F González-Pérez; J del Valle; X Navarro
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Biologic scaffolds composed of central nervous system extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Peter M Crapo; Christopher J Medberry; Janet E Reing; Stephen Tottey; Yolandi van der Merwe; Kristen E Jones; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Effects of biologic scaffolds on human stem cells and implications for CNS tissue engineering.

Authors:  Peter M Crapo; Stephen Tottey; Peter F Slivka; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 9.  Multifunctional therapeutic delivery strategies for effective neuro-regeneration following traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar; Yahya E Choonara; Girish Modi; Dinesh Naidoo; Viness Pillay
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 10.  Extracellular matrices, artificial neural scaffolds and the promise of neural regeneration.

Authors:  Christian B Ricks; Samuel S Shin; Christopher Becker; Ramesh Grandhi
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.135

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: Structure and function.

Authors:  Lindsey T Saldin; Madeline C Cramer; Sachin S Velankar; Lisa J White; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: In vivo applications and development.

Authors:  Martin T Spang; Karen L Christman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  The characterization of decellularized human skeletal muscle as a blueprint for mimetic scaffolds.

Authors:  Klaire Wilson; Abby Terlouw; Kevin Roberts; Jeffrey C Wolchok
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Introduction: Special Issue in Honor of Eva Syková.

Authors:  N Joan Abbott; Charles Nicholson; Alexei Verkhratsky
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Decellularized peripheral nerve supports Schwann cell transplants and axon growth following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Susana R Cerqueira; Yee-Shuan Lee; Robert C Cornelison; Michaela W Mertz; Rebecca A Wachs; Christine E Schmidt; Mary Bartlett Bunge
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Processing of Human Cardiac Tissue Toward Extracellular Matrix Self-assembling Hydrogel for In Vitro and In Vivo Applications.

Authors:  Matthias Becker; Janita A Maring; Barbara Oberwallner; Benjamin Kappler; Oliver Klein; Volkmar Falk; Christof Stamm
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Epac2 Elevation Reverses Inhibition by Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans In Vitro and Transforms Postlesion Inhibitory Environment to Promote Axonal Outgrowth in an Ex Vivo Model of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Alba Guijarro-Belmar; Mindaugas Viskontas; Yuting Wei; Xuenong Bo; Derryck Shewan; Wenlong Huang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Regenerative Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Nureddin Ashammakhi; Han-Jun Kim; Arshia Ehsanipour; Rebecca D Bierman; Outi Kaarela; Chengbin Xue; Ali Khademhosseini; Stephanie K Seidlits
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 9.  Nanoparticle technology and stem cell therapy team up against neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Caroline Vissers; Guo-Li Ming; Hongjun Song
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Metformin Protects Against Spinal Cord Injury by Regulating Autophagy via the mTOR Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Yue Guo; Fang Wang; Haopeng Li; Hui Liang; Yuhuan Li; Zhengchao Gao; Xijing He
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.