Literature DB >> 26729270

Concurrent functional and metabolic assessment of brain tumors using hybrid PET/MR imaging.

B Sacconi1, R A Raad1, J Lee1, H Fine2, D Kondziolka3, J G Golfinos3, J S Babb1, R Jain4,5.   

Abstract

To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) and positron emission tomography (PET) using an integrated PET/MR system in tumor grading as well as in differentiating recurrent tumor from treatment-induced effects (TIE) in brain tumor patients. Twenty patients (Group A: treatment naïve, 9 patients with 16 lesions; Group B: post-therapy, 11 patients with 18 lesions) underwent fluorine 18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) brain PET/MR with PWI. Two blinded readers predicted low versus high-grade tumor (for Group A) and tumor recurrence versus TIE (for Group B) based solely on tumor rCBV (regional cerebral blood volume) and SUV (standardized uptake values). Tumor histopathology at resection was the reference standard. Using rCBV(mean) ≤ 1.74 as a cut-off, 100% sensitivity and 74% specificity were observed, whereas 75% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity were observed with SUV(mean) ≤ 4.0 as a cut-off to classify patients as test positive for low-grade tumors (Group A) and TIE (Group B). Diagnostic accuracy for detection of low-grade tumors was 90% using PWI and 40% using PET in Group A (p = 0.056); for detection of TIE in Group B, diagnostic accuracy was 94.1% using PWI and 55.6% using PET (p = 0.033). No significant correlation was demonstrated between rCBV parameters and SUV in Group A (mean values: p > 0.403), Group B (p > 0.06) and in the entire population (p > 0.07). Best overall sensitivity and specificity were obtained using rCBV(mean) ≤ 1.74 and SUV(mean) ≤ 4.0 cut-off values. PWI demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy in both groups. Poor correlation was observed between FDG and rCBV parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBV; FDG; Glioma; PET/MR; Perfusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26729270     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-2032-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  29 in total

Review 1.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques.

Authors:  Matthias Hofmann; Bernd Pichler; Bernhard Schölkopf; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Exploratory evaluation of MR permeability with 18F-FDG PET mapping in pediatric brain tumors: a report from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Katherine A Zukotynski; Frederic H Fahey; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Sarah S Ng; Mehmet Kocak; Sridharan Gururangan; Larry E Kun; Tina Y Poussaint
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas.

Authors:  Frederic G Dhermain; Peter Hau; Heinrich Lanfermann; Andreas H Jacobs; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Prospective analysis of parametric response map-derived MRI biomarkers: identification of early and distinct glioma response patterns not predicted by standard radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Thomas L Chenevert; Charles R Meyer; Christina Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Daniel A Hamstra; Larry Junck; Pia C Sundgren; Timothy D Johnson; Stefanie Galbán; Judith S Sebolt-Leopold; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Comparison of the effectiveness of MRI perfusion and fluorine-18 FDG PET-CT for differentiating radiation injury from viable brain tumor: a preliminary retrospective analysis with pathologic correlation in all patients.

Authors:  Vaios Hatzoglou; Gary A Ulaner; Zhigang Zhang; Kathryn Beal; Andrei I Holodny; Robert J Young
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; T Hirai; T Okuda; Y Shigematsu; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Ushio; M Takahashi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient and cerebral blood volume in brain gliomas: relation to tumor cell density and tumor microvessel density based on stereotactic biopsies.

Authors:  N Sadeghi; N D'Haene; C Decaestecker; M Levivier; T Metens; C Maris; D Wikler; D Baleriaux; I Salmon; S Goldman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Radiation necrosis or glioma recurrence: is computer-assisted stereotactic biopsy useful?

Authors:  P A Forsyth; P J Kelly; T L Cascino; B W Scheithauer; E G Shaw; R P Dinapoli; E J Atkinson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Does the novel integrated PET/MRI offer the same diagnostic performance as PET/CT for oncological indications?

Authors:  Jiahe Tian; Liping Fu; Dayi Yin; Jinming Zhang; Yingmao Chen; Ningyu An; Baixuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The use of (18)F-FDG PET to differentiate progressive disease from treatment induced necrosis in high grade glioma.

Authors:  J W Dankbaar; T J Snijders; P A Robe; T Seute; W Eppinga; J Hendrikse; B De Keizer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Neurologic Applications of PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  Michelle M Miller-Thomas; Tammie L S Benzinger
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Perfusion weighted imaging using combined gradient/spin echo EPIK: Brain tumour applications in hybrid MR-PET.

Authors:  N Jon Shah; Nuno André da Silva; Seong Dae Yun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Hemodynamic Imaging in Cerebral Diffuse Glioma-Part B: Molecular Correlates, Treatment Effect Monitoring, Prognosis, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Vittorio Stumpo; Lelio Guida; Jacopo Bellomo; Christiaan Hendrik Bas Van Niftrik; Martina Sebök; Moncef Berhouma; Andrea Bink; Michael Weller; Zsolt Kulcsar; Luca Regli; Jorn Fierstra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Update on the Use of PET/MRI Contrast Agents and Tracers in Brain Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alessio Smeraldo; Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione; Andrea Soricelli; Paolo Antonio Netti; Enza Torino
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-07-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.