| Literature DB >> 26729177 |
Alsu A Akhmetshina1,2, Ilsiya M Davletbaeva3,4,5, Ekaterina S Grebenschikova6, Tatyana S Sazanova7, Anton N Petukhov8, Artem A Atlaskin9, Evgeny N Razov10, Ilnaz I Zaripov11, Carla F Martins12, Luísa A Neves13, Ilya V Vorotyntsev14.
Abstract
Microporous polymers based on anionic macroinitiator and toluene 2,4-diisocyanate were used as a support for 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([bmim][PF₆]) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([emim][Tf₂N]) immobilization. The polymeric support was modified by using silica particles associated in oligomeric media, and the influence of the modifier used on the polymeric structure was studied. The supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) were tested for He, N₂, NH₃, H₂S, and CO₂ gas separation and ideal selectivities were calculated. The high values of ideal selectivity for ammonia-based systems with permanent gases were observed on polymer matrixes immobilized with [bmim][PF₆] and [emim][Tf₂N]. The modification of SILMs by nanosize silica particles leads to an increase of NH₃ separation relatively to CO₂ or H₂S.Entities:
Keywords: SILMs; gas separation; ionic liquid; microporous polymers; modification; supported liquid membrane
Year: 2015 PMID: 26729177 PMCID: PMC4812410 DOI: 10.3390/membranes6010004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1(a) Interaction of PDMS with TEOS involving the latent water and (b) interaction of PEG with TEOS involving the latent water.
Figure 2Particle size distribution for ASC obtained in presence of 0.5%wt of potassium alcoholate groups and 0.05%wt of water, determined by dynamic light scattering.
Figure 3(a) AFM image (10 × 10 μm) for the unmodified polymer; (b) AFM image (10 × 10 μm) for the polymer modified by 0.8%wt ASC.
Figure 4Pore size distributions for the polymer [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) (1) and ASC modified polymer (2).
Figure 5SEM images of the surface and cross section of unmodified polymer ((a) surface; (b) cross-section) and ASC modified polymer ((c) surface; (d) cross-section).
Figure 6Surface tension dependence of toluene solution with ASC content.
Contact angle of ionic liquids on polymeric supports, average pore diameter and calculated capillary pressure.
| Polymeric Support | IL | Contact angle, º | Average Pore Diameter, nm | Capillary Pressure, bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 | [bmim][PF6] | 35 ± 1 | 11 ± 0.2 | 134.94 ± 0.08 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 | 57 ± 1 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 141.98 ± 0.08 | |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 | [emim][Tf2N] | 49 ± 1 | 11 ± 0.2 | 175.58 ± 0.08 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 | 63 ± 1 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 190.94 ± 0.08 |
Figure 7(a) AFM image (30 × 30 μm) of the unmodified polymer after the permeability test of SILM containing [emim][Tf2N]; (b) AFM image (10 × 10 μm) of the polymer modified by 0.8%wt ASC after the permeability test of SILM containing [emim][Tf2N]); (c) AFM image (10 × 10 μm) of the unmodified polymer after the permeability test of SILM containing [bmim][PF6]; (d) AFM image (10 × 10 μm) of the polymer modified by 0.8%wt ASC after the permeability test of SILM containing [bmim][PF6]).
Permeabilities of pure gases.
| Polymeric Support | IL | Permeability, Barrer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| He | N2 | H2S | CO2 | NH3 | ||
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) | none | <0.13 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | <0.13 | 200 ± 10 | 620 ± 10 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC | none | <0.13 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | <0.13 | 390 ± 24 | 370 ± 8 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) | [bmim][PF6] | <0.13 | <0.13 | <0.13 | 100 ± 4 | 810 ± 12 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC | [bmim][PF6] | <0.13 | <0.13 | <0.13 | 100 ± 4 | 650 ± 7 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC | [emim][Tf2N] | - | 4.0 ± 0.1 | - | 82.5 ± 0.4 | - |
The CO2 permeability through supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) based on [bmim][PF6].
| Support | Pore Diameter, nm | Membrane Thickness, μm | Porosity, % | Permeability, Barrer | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrophilic polyethersulfone (Beijing Membrane Corporation) | 220 | 150 | 80 | 1290 | [ |
| Alumina (Whatman Corporation) | 20 | 60 | 25–50 | 800 | [ |
| Hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (Millipore Corporation) | 220 | 125 | 70 | 168.7 | [ |
| Hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) | 200 | 95 | - | 9800 | [ |
The CO2 permeability through SILMs based on [emim][Tf2N].
| Support | Pore diameter, nm | Membrane thickness, μm | Porosity, % | Permeability, Barrer | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrophilic polyethersulfone (Pall Corporation) | 200 | 152 | - | 960 | [ |
| Alumina (Whatman Corporation) | 20 | 60 | 24 | 1620 | [ |
| Hydrophilic polyethersulfone (Pall Corporation) | 200 | 145 | 80 | 680 | [ |
| Hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (Millipore Corporation) | 220 | 125 | 70 | 600 | [ |
Ideal selectivity for gas mixtures
| Polymer support | Ideal Selectivity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH3/G* | NH3/N2 | CO2/G* | CO2/N2 | NH3/CO2 | |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] =1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) | >4800 | >4800 | >1500 | >1500 | 3.1 ± 0.2 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] =1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC | >2800 | >2800 | >3000 | >3000 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] =1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) [bmim][PF6] | >6200 | 270 ± 10 | >770 | 33 ± 3 | 8.1 ± 0.3 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] =1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC [bmim][PF6] | >5000 | 217 ± 10 | >770 | 33 ± 3 | 6.5 ± 0.3 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] =1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC [emim][Tf2N] | - | - | - | 21.6 ± 2 | - |
* G—helium, hydrogen sulfide
Figure 8The Robeson plot for separation carbon dioxide from nitrogen.
Mass uptake of the ionic liquids (IL) by the polymeric supports.
| Polymer support | Ionic liquid | Uptake, % (w/w) |
|---|---|---|
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) | [bmim][PF6] | 2.0 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC | [bmim][PF6] | 4.2 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) | [emim][Tf2N] | 51.9 |
| [PPEG]:[TDI] = 1:15 (co-catalyst CuCl2) with 0.8%wt ASC | [emim][Tf2N] | 6.4 |
Figure 9Scheme of experimental set-up for gases permeability measurements.