Literature DB >> 26728763

Trisomy 18: A single-center evaluation of management trends and experience with aggressive obstetric or neonatal intervention.

Akila Subramaniam1,2, Adam P Jacobs3, Ying Tang1, Cherry Neely1, Joseph B Philips4, Joseph R Biggio1, Nathaniel H Robin2,4, Rodney K Edwards1.   

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all prenatal and postnatal diagnoses of trisomy 18 (T18) from 2004 to 2014 at a single tertiary referral center in the southern United States to evaluate the natural history and perinatal outcomes associated with T18 over the past decade. We analyzed pregnancy outcome, mode of delivery, and for live-births, the number and types of neonatal interventions, and characterized interventions as aggressive or non-aggressive. Survival analyses were conducted based on mode of delivery and aggressive compared to non-aggressive interventions. A total of 167 cases of T18 were identified, 150 with available records. There were 141 (94.0%) with full T18; the remainder had mosaicism (1.3%), a translocation (0.7%), or an isochromosome 18 (4.0%). Most diagnoses were prenatal (73.3%, n = 110). Of the 150 patients, there were 54 live births: 21 (38.9%) delivered vaginally, 32 (59.3%) delivered by cesarean, and mode of delivery could not be ascertained for one. Median duration of survival was 12 days (interquartile range 3-90 days). Over time, there were no changes toward increased intervention (obstetric or neonatal). For the 49 neonates who received some intervention, there was no significant difference in survival time between neonates receiving aggressive (n = 36, median survival 24 days, interquartile range 6-247) and non-aggressive (n = 13, median survival 30 days, interquartile range 8-148) intervention (P = 0.90). There was similarly no difference in neonatal survival based on mode of delivery (P = 0.79). Survival of infants with T18 is not improved with aggressive obstetric or neonatal care.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neonatal intervention; obstetric intervention; survival; trisomy 18

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26728763     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  4 in total

1.  A visual tool inclusive of fetal ultrasound and autopsy findings to reach a balanced approach to counseling on trisomy 18 in early second trimester.

Authors:  Stefania Triunfo; Marta Bonollo; Priska Gaffuri; Manuela Viviano; Daniele Satta; Manuela Bergmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Treatment Decisions for Babies with Trisomy 13 and 18.

Authors:  Isabella Pallotto; John D Lantos
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-09

3.  Experiences of children with trisomy 18 referred to pediatric palliative care services on two continents.

Authors:  Jonathan Mullin; Joanne Wolfe; Myra Bluebond-Langner; Finella Craig
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 4.  New Challenges with Treatment Advances in Newborn Infants with Genetic Disorders and Severe Congenital Malformations.

Authors:  Rahel Schuler; Ivonne Bedei; Frank Oehmke; Klaus-Peter Zimmer; Harald Ehrhardt
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.