Literature DB >> 26728638

Carbon fluxes acclimate more strongly to elevated growth temperatures than to elevated CO2 concentrations in a northern conifer.

Yulia Kroner1, Danielle A Way1,2.   

Abstract

Increasing temperatures and atmospheric CO2 concentrations will affect tree carbon fluxes, generating potential feedbacks between forests and the global climate system. We studied how elevated temperatures and CO2 impacted leaf carbon dynamics in Norway spruce (Picea abies), a dominant northern forest species, to improve predictions of future photosynthetic and respiratory fluxes from high-latitude conifers. Seedlings were grown under ambient (AC, c. 435 μmol mol(-1) ) or elevated (EC, 750 μmol mol(-1) ) CO2 concentrations at ambient, +4 °C, or +8 °C growing temperatures. Photosynthetic rates (Asat ) were high in +4 °C/EC seedlings and lowest in +8 °C spruce, implying that moderate, but not extreme, climate change may stimulate carbon uptake. Asat , dark respiration (Rdark ), and light respiration (Rlight ) rates acclimated to temperature, but not CO2 : the thermal optimum of Asat increased, and Rdark and Rlight were suppressed under warming. In all treatments, the Q10 of Rlight (the relative increase in respiration for a 10 °C increase in leaf temperature) was 35% higher than the Q10 of Rdark , so the ratio of Rlight to Rdark increased with rising leaf temperature. However, across all treatments and a range of 10-40 °C leaf temperatures, a consistent relationship between Rlight and Rdark was found, which could be used to model Rlight in future climates. Acclimation reduced daily modeled respiratory losses from warm-grown seedlings by 22-56%. When Rlight was modeled as a constant fraction of Rdark , modeled daily respiratory losses were 11-65% greater than when using measured values of Rlight . Our findings highlight the impact of acclimation to future climates on predictions of carbon uptake and losses in northern trees, in particular the need to model daytime respiratory losses from direct measurements of Rlight or appropriate relationships with Rdark .
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide; climate change; day respiration; photosynthesis; specific leaf area; thermal acclimation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26728638     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  Respiratory and Photosynthetic Responses of Antarctic Vascular Plants Are Differentially Affected by CO2 Enrichment and Nocturnal Warming.

Authors:  Carolina Sanhueza; Daniela Cortes; Danielle A Way; Francisca Fuentes; Luisa Bascunan-Godoy; Nestor Fernandez Del-Saz; Patricia L Sáez; León A Bravo; Lohengrin A Cavieres
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Testing Projected Climate Change Conditions on the Endoconidiophora polonica / Norway spruce Pathosystem Shows Fungal Strain Specific Effects.

Authors:  Riikka Linnakoski; Kristian M Forbes; Michael J Wingfield; Pertti Pulkkinen; Fred O Asiegbu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  The sensitivity of the forest carbon budget shifts across processes along with stand development and climate change.

Authors:  Alessio Collalti; Peter E Thornton; Alessandro Cescatti; Angelo Rita; Marco Borghetti; Angelo Nolè; Carlo Trotta; Philippe Ciais; Giorgio Matteucci
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Consistent diurnal pattern of leaf respiration in the light among contrasting species and climates.

Authors:  Andreas H Faber; Kevin L Griffin; Mark G Tjoelker; Majken Pagter; Jinyan Yang; Dan Bruhn
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 10.323

5.  Characterizing the drivers of seedling leaf gas exchange responses to warming and altered precipitation: indirect and direct effects.

Authors:  Nicholas G Smith; Grace Pold; Carol Goranson; Jeffrey S Dukes
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Large sensitivity in land carbon storage due to geographical and temporal variation in the thermal response of photosynthetic capacity.

Authors:  Lina M Mercado; Belinda E Medlyn; Chris Huntingford; Rebecca J Oliver; Douglas B Clark; Stephen Sitch; Przemyslaw Zelazowski; Jens Kattge; Anna B Harper; Peter M Cox
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 10.151

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.