Literature DB >> 26728019

Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes high-throughput Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene.

Xiaoyang Wu1, Honghai Zhang2, Jun Chen1, Shuai Shang1, Qinguo Wei1, Jiakuo Yan1, Xiangyu Tu1.   

Abstract

Intestinal microbes are part of a complex ecosystem. They have a mutual relationship with the host and play an essential role in maintaining the host's health. To optimize the feeding strategies and improve the health status of the dhole, which is an endangered species, we analyzed the structure of fecal microbes in four captive dholes using high-throughput Illumina sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The diversity indexes and rarefaction curves indicated high microbial diversity in the intestines of the four dholes. The average number of operational taxonomical units (OTUs) in the four samples was 1196, but the number of OTUs common to all libraries was 126, suggesting only a few dominant species. Phylogenetic analysis identified 19 prokaryotic phyla from the 16S rRNA gene sequences, of which only 5 phyla were core microbiota: Bacteroidetes (21.63-38.97 %), Firmicutes (20.97-44.01 %), Proteobacteria (9.33-17.60 %), Fusobacteria (9.11-17.90 %), and Actinobacteria (1.22-2.87 %). These five phyla accounted for 97 % of the bacteria in all the dholes apart from one, in which 78 % of the bacteria were from these phyla. The results of our study provide an effective theoretical basis from which to reach an understanding of the biological mechanisms relevant to the protection of this endangered species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; Dhole (Cuon alpinus); Fecal microbes; Illumina MiSeq sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26728019     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-7257-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  42 in total

1.  Effects of Elevated Tetracycline Concentrations on Aerobic Composting of Human Feces: Composting Behavior and Microbial Community Succession.

Authors:  Honglei Shi; Xiaochang C Wang; Qian Li; Shanqing Jiang
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Microbial community and ovine host response varies with early and late stages of Haemonchus contortus infection.

Authors:  Saeed El-Ashram; Ibrahim Al Nasr; Fathi Abouhajer; Maged El-Kemary; Guangping Huang; Güngör Dinçel; Rashid Mehmood; Min Hu; Xun Suo
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Unique diversity and functions of the arsenic-methylating microorganisms from the tailings of Shimen Realgar Mine.

Authors:  Janet Victoria Ngegla; Xing Zhou; Xiaoming Chen; Xianbin Zhu; Ziwei Liu; Jilong Feng; Xian-Chun Zeng
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Effects of Gasterophilus pecorum infestation on the intestinal microbiota of the rewilded Przewalski's horses in China.

Authors:  Dini Hu; Yuzhu Chao; Boru Zhang; Chen Wang; Yingjie Qi; Make Ente; Dong Zhang; Kai Li; Kai Meng Mok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between wild and captive sika deer (Cervus nippon hortulorum) from feces by high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Yu Guan; Haitao Yang; Siyu Han; Limin Feng; Tianming Wang; Jianping Ge
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Profiling bacterial communities by MinION sequencing of ribosomal operons.

Authors:  Lee J Kerkhof; Kevin P Dillon; Max M Häggblom; Lora R McGuinness
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 14.650

7.  Comparative Analyses of the Gut Microbiome of Two Fox Species, the Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes) and Corsac Fox (Vulpes Corsac), that Occupy Different Ecological Niches.

Authors:  Xibao Wang; Yongquan Shang; Qinguo Wei; Xiaoyang Wu; Huashan Dou; Huanxin Zhang; Shengyang Zhou; Weilai Sha; Guolei Sun; Shengchao Ma; Honghai Zhang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Habitat environmental factors influence intestinal microbial diversity of the short-faced moles (Scaptochirus moschata).

Authors:  Lei Chen; Di Xu; Jing Zhu; Shen Wang; Mi Liu; Mengyao Sun; Geyang Wang; Lingyu Song; Xiaoyu Liu; Tianyu Xie
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Analysis and comparison of the wolf microbiome under different environmental factors using three different data of Next Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Wu; Huanxin Zhang; Jun Chen; Shuai Shang; Jiakuo Yan; Yao Chen; Xuexi Tang; Honghai Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A global comparison of the microbiome compositions of three gut locations in commercial pigs with extreme feed conversion ratios.

Authors:  Jianping Quan; Gengyuan Cai; Jian Ye; Ming Yang; Rongrong Ding; Xingwang Wang; Enqin Zheng; Disheng Fu; Shaoyun Li; Shenping Zhou; Dewu Liu; Jie Yang; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.