Literature DB >> 26727552

Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.

Elena McDonald-Buller1, Yosuke Kimura1, Michael Craig2, Gary McGaughey1, David Allen1, Mort Webster3.   

Abstract

Cap and trade programs have historically been designed to achieve annual or seasonal reductions in emissions of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide from power plants. Emissions reductions may not be temporally coincident with meteorological conditions conducive to the formation of peak ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations. Integrated power system and air quality modeling methods were developed to evaluate time-differentiated emissions price signals on high ozone days in the Mid-Atlantic portion of the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) Interconnection and Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) grids. Sufficient flexibility exists in the two grids with marked differences in demand and fuel generation mix to accommodate time-differentiated emissions pricing alone or in combination with a season-wide program. System-wide emissions reductions and production costs from time-differentiated pricing are shown to be competitive with those of a season-wide program on high ozone days and would be more cost-effective if the primary policy goal was to target emissions reductions on these days. Time-differentiated pricing layered as a complement to the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule had particularly pronounced benefits for the Mid-Atlantic PJM system that relies heavily on coal-fired generation. Time-differentiated pricing aimed at reducing ozone concentrations had particulate matter reduction co-benefits, but if particulate matter reductions are the primary objective, other approaches to time-differentiated pricing may lead to greater benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26727552     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  A Green Desulfurization Technique: Utilization of Flue Gas SO2 to Produce H2 via a Photoelectrochemical Process Based on Mo-Doped BiVO4.

Authors:  Jin Han; Kejian Li; Hanyun Cheng; Liwu Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.221

2.  Multi-perspective comparisons and mitigation implications of SO2 and NO x discharges from the industrial sector of China: a decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Junsong Jia; Zhihai Gong; Zhongyu Gu; Chundi Chen; Dongming Xie
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Understanding Technology, Fuel, Market and Policy Drivers for New York State's Power Sector Transformation.

Authors:  Mine Isik; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 4.  Effective options for addressing air quality- related environmental public health burdens in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Jared Woollacott; Wael Alsufyani; Robert H Beach; Laura T R Morrison; Alison Bean de Hernández; Severin Rakic; Mashael AlOmran; Reem F Alsukait; Christopher H Herbst; Salem AlBalawi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  Air-quality-related health impacts from climate change and from adaptation of cooling demand for buildings in the eastern United States: An interdisciplinary modeling study.

Authors:  David W Abel; Tracey Holloway; Monica Harkey; Paul Meier; Doug Ahl; Vijay S Limaye; Jonathan A Patz
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Health benefits and control costs of tightening particulate matter emissions standards for coal power plants - The case of Northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel B Howard; Jesse Thé; Rafael Soria; Neal Fann; Roberto Schaeffer; Jean-Daniel M Saphores
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 9.621

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.