Literature DB >> 26727041

Antidepressant augmentation with metyrapone for treatment-resistant depression (the ADD study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

R Hamish McAllister-Williams1, Ian M Anderson2, Andreas Finkelmeyer3, Peter Gallagher4, Heinz C R Grunze5, Peter M Haddad6, Tom Hughes7, Adrian J Lloyd3, Chrysovalanto Mamasoula8, Elaine McColl8, Simon Pearce9, Najma Siddiqi10, Baxi N P Sinha11, Nick Steen8, June Wainwright4, Fiona H Winter4, I Nicol Ferrier3, Stuart Watson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with major depressive disorder have treatment-resistant depression, defined as no adequate response to two consecutive courses of antidepressants. Some evidence suggests that antiglucocorticoid augmentation of antidepressants might be efficacious in patients with major depressive disorder. We aimed to test the proof of concept of metyrapone for the augmentation of serotonergic antidepressants in the clinically relevant population of patients with treatment-resistant depression.
METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial recruited patients from seven UK National Health Service (NHS) Mental Health Trusts from three areas (northeast England, northwest England, and the Leeds and Bradford area). Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with treatment-resistant depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item score of ≥18 and a Massachusetts General Hospital Treatment-Resistant Depression staging score of 2-10) and taking a single-agent or combination antidepressant treatment that included a serotonergic drug. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) through a centralised web-based system to metyrapone (500 mg twice daily) or placebo, in addition to their existing antidepressant regimen, for 21 days. Permuted block randomisation was done with a block size of two or four, stratified by centre and primary or secondary care setting. The primary outcome was improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score 5 weeks after randomisation, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned patients that completed the MADRS assessment at week 5. The study has an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN45338259) and is registered with the EU Clinical Trial register, number 2009-015165-31.
FINDINGS: Between Feb 8, 2011, and Dec 10, 2012, 165 patients were recruited and randomly assigned (83 to metyrapone and 82 to placebo), with 143 (87%) completing the primary outcome assessment (69 [83%] in the metyrapone and 74 [90%] in the placebo group). At 5 weeks, MADRS score did not significantly differ between groups (21·7 points [95% CI 19·2-24·4] in the metyrapone group vs 22·6 points [20·1-24·8] in the placebo group; adjusted mean difference of -0·51 points [95% CI -3·48 to 2·46]; p=0·74). 12 serious adverse events were reported in four (5%) of 83 patients in the metyrapone group and six (7%) of 82 patients in the placebo group, none of which were related to study treatment. 134 adverse events occurred in 58 (70%) patients in the metyrapone group compared with 95 events in 45 (55%) patients in the placebo group, of which 11 (8%) events in the metyrapone group and four (4%) in the placebo group were judged by principle investigators at the time of occurrence to be probably related to the study drug.
INTERPRETATION: Metyrapone augmentation of antidepressants is not efficacious in a broadly representative population of patients with treatment-resistant depression within the NHS and therefore is not an option for patients with treatment-resistant depression in routine clinical practice at this time. Further research is needed to clarify if such augmentation might benefit subpopulations with demonstrable hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis abnormalities. FUNDING: Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme, a UK Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research partnership.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26727041     DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00436-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


  12 in total

1.  Connectivity guided theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation versus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant moderate to severe depression: study protocol for a randomised double-blind controlled trial (BRIGhTMIND).

Authors:  Richard Morriss; Lucy Webster; Mohamed Abdelghani; Dorothee P Auer; Shaun Barber; Peter Bates; Andrew Blamire; Paul M Briley; Cassandra Brookes; Sarina Iwabuchi; Marilyn James; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Sudheer Lankappa; Peter Liddle; Hamish McAllister-Williams; Alex O'Neill-Kerr; Stefan Pszczolkowski Parraguez; Ana Suazo Di Paola; Louise Thomson; Yvette Walters
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Hormonal Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: State of the Art.

Authors:  Jennifer B Dwyer; Awais Aftab; Rajiv Radhakrishnan; Alik Widge; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Linda L Carpenter; Charles B Nemeroff; William M McDonald; Ned H Kalin
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Pharmacological Augmentation in Unipolar Depression: A Guide to the Guidelines.

Authors:  Rachael W Taylor; Lindsey Marwood; Emanuella Oprea; Valeria DeAngel; Sarah Mather; Beatrice Valentini; Roland Zahn; Allan H Young; Anthony J Cleare
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 4.  Backing into the future: pharmacological approaches to the management of resistant depression.

Authors:  P J Cowen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Repeated salivary daytime cortisol and onset of mood episodes in offspring of bipolar parents.

Authors:  Sarah M Goodday; Julie Horrocks; Charles Keown-Stoneman; Paul Grof; Anne Duffy
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2016-05-26

Review 6.  Biomarkers for depression: recent insights, current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Rebecca Strawbridge; Allan H Young; Anthony J Cleare
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Can treatment of obesity reduce depression or vice versa?

Authors:  Stephanie L Borgland
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  Comparison of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal function in treatment resistant unipolar and bipolar depression.

Authors:  Kalypso Markopoulou; Susanne Fischer; Andrew Papadopoulos; Lucia Poon; Lena J Rane; Abebaw Fekadu; Anthony J Cleare
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 9.  New agents and perspectives in the pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Marsal Sanches; Joao Quevedo; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.067

10.  Grey and white matter differences in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome - A voxel-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Andreas Finkelmeyer; Jiabao He; Laura Maclachlan; Stuart Watson; Peter Gallagher; Julia L Newton; Andrew M Blamire
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.