Literature DB >> 26726910

Purity homophily in social networks.

Morteza Dehghani1, Kate Johnson2, Joe Hoover2, Eyal Sagi3, Justin Garten4, Niki Jitendra Parmar5, Stephen Vaisey6, Rumen Iliev7, Jesse Graham2.   

Abstract

Does sharing moral values encourage people to connect and form communities? The importance of moral homophily (love of same) has been recognized by social scientists, but the types of moral similarities that drive this phenomenon are still unknown. Using both large-scale, observational social-media analyses and behavioral lab experiments, the authors investigated which types of moral similarities influence tie formations. Analysis of a corpus of over 700,000 tweets revealed that the distance between 2 people in a social-network can be predicted based on differences in the moral purity content-but not other moral content-of their messages. The authors replicated this finding by experimentally manipulating perceived moral difference (Study 2) and similarity (Study 3) in the lab and demonstrating that purity differences play a significant role in social distancing. These results indicate that social network processes reflect moral selection, and both online and offline differences in moral purity concerns are particularly predictive of social distance. This research is an attempt to study morality indirectly using an observational big-data study complemented with 2 confirmatory behavioral experiments carried out using traditional social-psychology methodology. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26726910     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  3 in total

1.  The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.

Authors:  James A Dungan; Alek Chakroff; Liane Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Development and validation of the Japanese Moral Foundations Dictionary.

Authors:  Akiko Matsuo; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Yasuhiro Taguchi; Minoru Karasawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The evolution of online ideological communities.

Authors:  Brittany I Davidson; Simon L Jones; Adam N Joinson; Joanne Hinds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.