Literature DB >> 26726267

Uninformed Decisions? The Online Presentation of Success and Failure of IVF and Related Methods on German IVF Centre Websites.

S Kadi1, U Wiesing1.   

Abstract

Background: Patients increasingly use the internet as a source of medical information before initial contact with doctors and during treatment. This applies to reproductive medicine too, where the internet could offer patients the chance to inform themselves in advance about specific procedures and the treatment centres that offer them. In this way it could potentially contribute to informed patient decision-making. This article analyses the web presence of German fertility treatment centres with respect to the provision of information on success rates, risks and side effects of treatment.
Methods: Analysis of published success rates and information on the risks and adverse effects of IVF and related methods on German IVF centre websites.
Results: Over half of the 129 centres (62.02 %) state a general success rate or their own institution's success rate. Less than a quarter (24.03 %) states their own institution's pregnancy rate and only 7.75 % their own birth rate. The published success rates are mostly pregnancy rates (pregnancy per embryo transfer), which by definition are higher than baby take-home-rates creating unrealistic expectations. Only 61 centres (47.29 %) mention risks and side effects of the procedures offered, and that in varying detail. Only 7 centres (5.43 %) provide information on the risk of psychological stress associated with unsuccessful fertility treatment.
Conclusion: There is insufficient opportunity for women and their partners to inform themselves adequately on the internet in advance of treatment about available treatment methods, their success rates and associated risks/side effects; this applies both to specific facilities as well as to the procedures in general. In contrast to other countries, in Germany there is a lack of discussion on content requirements for fertility treatment facility websites.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; assisted reproductive technology (ART); internet; patient information; success rates

Year:  2015        PMID: 26726267      PMCID: PMC4686366          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  10 in total

Review 1.  Website quality assessment: mistaking apples for oranges.

Authors:  Tarun Jain; Robert L Barbieri
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Quality of fertility clinic websites.

Authors:  Jack Y J Huang; Federico Discepola; Haya Al-Fozan; Togas Tulandi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  How do infertile couples choose their IVF centers? An Internet-based survey.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Diana M Marcus; Samuel F Marcus
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines.

Authors:  Mary E Abusief; Mark D Hornstein; Tarun Jain
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Are we exploiting the infertile couple?

Authors:  R E Blackwell; B R Carr; R J Chang; A H DeCherney; A F Haney; W R Keye; R W Rebar; J A Rock; Z Rosenwaks; M M Seibel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The in vitro fertilization pregnancy rate: let's be honest with one another.

Authors:  M R Soules
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  [The physician's role in various clinical contexts. Physician counseling on in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)].

Authors:  H Kentenich; A Tandler-Schneider
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  [Health information on the Internet: Who is searching for what, when and how?].

Authors:  Beate Zschorlich; Dorothea Gechter; Inger M Janßen; Thomas Swinehart; Beate Wiegard; Klaus Koch
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2015-05-01

9.  The IVF league tables: time for a reality check.

Authors:  Khaldoun Sharif; Masoud Afnan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Infertility information on the World Wide Web: a cross-sectional survey of quality of infertility information on the internet in the UK.

Authors:  Jennifer V Marriott; Piotr Stec; Tarek El-Toukhy; Yakoub Khalaf; Peter Braude; Arri Coomarasamy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Response to the Comment by the Board of the German IVF Register.

Authors:  S Kadi; U Wiesing
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  The German IVF Register as an Instrument to Document Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  S Kadi; U Wiesing
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.915

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.