| Literature DB >> 26726131 |
Laetitia Cotin-Galvan1, Adrien C Pozzi, Guillaume Schwob, Pascale Fournier, Maria P Fernandez, Aude Herrera-Belaroussi.
Abstract
Frankia Sp+ strains maintain their ability to sporulate in symbiosis with actinorhizal plants, producing abundant sporangia inside host plant cells, in contrast to Sp- strains, which are unable to perform in-planta sporulation. We herein examined the role of in-planta sporulation in Frankia infectivity and competitiveness for root infection. Fifteen strains belonging to different Sp+ and Sp- phylogenetic lineages were inoculated on seedlings of Alnus glutinosa (Ag) and A. incana (Ai). Strain competitiveness was investigated by performing Sp-/Sp+ co-inoculations. Plant inoculations were standardized using crushed nodules obtained under laboratory-controlled conditions (same plant species, age, and environmental factors). Specific oligonucleotide primers were developed to identify Frankia Sp+ and/or Sp- strains in the resulting nodules. Single inoculation experiments showed that (i) infectivity by Sp+ strains was significantly greater than that by Sp- strains, (ii) genetically divergent Sp+ strains exhibited different infective abilities, and (iii) Sp+ and Sp- strains showed different host preferences according to the origin (host species) of the inocula. Co-inoculations of Sp+ and Sp- strains revealed the greater competitiveness of Sp+ strains (98.3 to 100% of Sp+ nodules, with up to 15.6% nodules containing both Sp+ and Sp- strains). The results of the present study highlight differences in Sp+/Sp- strain ecological behaviors and provide new insights to strengthen the obligate symbiont hypothesis for Sp+ strains.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26726131 PMCID: PMC4791110 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME15090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Sp+ and Sp− field nodules used as inocula
| Nodule phenotype | Site designation | Nodule acronym | No. of inoculated seedlings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Sp+ | Thury | AgTyI.5 | 40 | 25 | |
| Le Tremblay, Le-Bourget-du-Lac | AgTrS1 | 40 | 25 | ||
| Ornon | AiOR8 | 40 | 24 | ||
| Allemont | AiAll | 42 | 27 | ||
| La Bérarde | AvBI.5 | 40 | 25 | ||
| Col de la Croix de Fer | AvCf11.1 | 23 | 27 | ||
| La Toussuire | AvToI.2 | 40 | 27 | ||
|
| |||||
| Sp− | Arandon | AgARaG1 | 25 | 25 | |
| Le Blanchet, Bourget-en-Huile | AgLB4.3 | 26 | 25 | ||
| Le Grand-Lemps | AgGL1 | 22 | NT | ||
| Fond-de-France | AiFF2.1 | 25 | 24 | ||
| Le Blanchet, Bourget-en-Huile | AiGBh | 17 | NT | ||
| Col de la Croix de Fer | AvCf3 | 22 | NT | ||
| Col de la Croix de Fer | AvCf13.1 | 26 | 24 | ||
| Fond-de-France | AvFF1.1 | 28 | 26 | ||
Sp+ and Sp− = in-planta sporulating and non-sporulating phenotypes, respectively.
All sites from Pozzi et al. (32).
NT = non-tested conditions.
List of PCR primers used for Frankia strain genotyping
| Gene | Primer name | Sequence (5′→3′) | Tm (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| | dnAfdT7F | TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGAGGARTTCACCAACGACTTCAT | 62 |
| dnArvT3R | ATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGACRGAAGTGCTGGCCGATCTT | ||
| | pgkFwdT3 | ATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGATGAGGACGATCGACGACCTGC | 62 |
| pgkRevT7 | TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGCSAGGAAGGTGAAGCACAT | ||
|
| |||
| | F2 Sp− | CCATGGAGACGCCGAAGTAC ( | 65 |
| F3 Sp− | CGTCCGGGATCAGGTCG ( | 64–65 | |
| R2 Sp− | CATCGCGATCCTGTCGAAGAAG ( | 65 | |
| F3 Sp+ | GCGTCAGGGATCAGGTCA ( | 64 | |
| R2 Sp+ | CATCGCGATCCTGTCGAAAAAA ( | 64 | |
“fd”, “Fwd”, or “F” in the name indicate forward primers and “rv”, “Rev”, or “R” indicate reverse primers.
Position on the dnaA sequence of the ACN14a strain (GenBank accession NC_008278).
Fig. 1Effects of the Frankia strain-sporulating phenotype (Sp+ or Sp−) on the ability to infect A. glutinosa (Ag) and A. incana (Ai) seedlings (A), their nodulation rate (B), and plant growth (C) with “Growth index” (cm) corresponding to the sum between the root length and stem height data. Fig. B and C only include nodulated plants.
Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals (CI) computed with the modified Wald method (1) (A) or standard deviations (B and C).
Sp+ and Sp− strain infectivities on Alnus glutinosa and A. incana seedlings.
| Inoculated strains | % of nodulated plants | Nodule mean number per plant | Plant growth index (cm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Phenotype | Original | ||||||
| Sp+ | 96.3 (80) | 84.0 (50) | 13.7±0.8 | 5.2±0.5 | 18.7±1.1 | 6.3±0.6 | |
| 52.4 (82) | 82.4 (51) | 7.0±0.0 | 4.9±0.4 | 6.6±0.4 | 4.5±0.3 | ||
| 3.9 (103) | 31.6 (79) | 2.3±0.6 | 3.3±0.7 | 10.8±3.3 | 8.4±0.5 | ||
|
| |||||||
| Sp− | 27.4 (73) | 16.0 (50) | 3.0±0.9 | 1.9±0.4 | 8.1±1.2 | 6.8±1.2 | |
| 4.8 (42) | 16.7 (24) | 4.1±0.5 | 3.0±1.2 | 30.7±1.7 | 17.5±5.2 | ||
| 5.3 (76) | 2.0 (50) | 1.5±0.5 | 1.0 (1 plant) | 13.7±4.9 | 5.0 (1 plant) | ||
(n) number of inoculated seedlings.
only nodulated plants are included.
Competitiveness of co-inoculated Sp+ and Sp− strains on Alnus glutinosa host plants.
| Inoculated strains | Sp+ / Sp− ratio | Nb nodule per plant | Nodule proportions (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Sp+ | Sp− | Sp+ | Sp− | Sp+/Sp− | ||
| AgTyI.5 | None (Sp+ control) | 100/0 | 10.0±1.3 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| ||||||
| Mg60Ag2 | 85/15 | 8.2±1.0 | 96.7 | 0.0 | 3.3 | |
| 50/50 | 6.9±1.0 | 84.2 | 0.0 | 15.8 | ||
| 15/85 | 5.9±0.6 | 98.3 | 1.7 | 0.0 | ||
|
| ||||||
| ACN14a | 85/15 | 7.5±1.9 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 50/50 | 7.4±2.2 | 96.6 | 0.0 | 3.4 | ||
| 15/85 | 4.3 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
|
| ||||||
| AgTrS1 | None (Sp+ control) | 100/0 | 12.3±2.1 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| ||||||
| Mg60Ag2 | 85/15 | 10.2±1.3 | 96.7 | 0.0 | 3.3 | |
| 50/50 | 8.9±1.9 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| 15/85 | 6.7±1.1 | 96.7 | 0.0 | 3.3 | ||
|
| ||||||
| ACN14a | 85/15 | 12.5±1.9 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 50/50 | 9.0±1.8 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| 15/85 | 6.2±1.2 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Sp+: % of nodules with strain AgTyI.5 or AgTrS1; Sp−: % of nodules with strain Mg60Ag2 or ACN14a; Sp+/Sp−: both Sp+ and Sp− co-existing strains.
Significantly different from the corresponding Sp+ control plants (without Sp− co-inoculation, grey lines), using Tukey’s HSD tests (p-value<0.05).
Fig. 2Effects of Sp+/Sp− Frankia strain co-inoculation on plant development. Two Sp+ strains were tested: AgTyI.5 (A) and AgTrS1 (B), in co-inoculations with two Sp− strains (Mg60Ag2 = grey bars and ACN14a = white bars). “Growth index” (cm) was the sum between the root length and stem height data. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals (CI). Stars indicate significant differences from the Sp+ control plants tested with Wilcoxon rank sum statistical tests (p-value<0.05).