Jost Karsten Kloth1, Regina Neumann2, Eva von Stillfried3, Wolfram Stiller4, Iris Burkholder5, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor6, Volker Ewerbeck7, Marc-André Weber8. 1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany. Electronic address: jost.k.kloth@me.com. 2. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany. Electronic address: regina.s.neumann@gmail.com. 3. Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg D-69118, Germany. Electronic address: eva.stillfried@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 4. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany. Electronic address: wolfram.stiller@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 5. Department of Nursing and Health, University of Applied Sciences oft he Saarland, Goebenstrasse 40, Saarbruecken D-66117, Germany. Electronic address: stabil@burkholder.de. 6. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany. Electronic address: hans-ulrich.kauczor@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 7. Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg D-69118, Germany. Electronic address: volker.ewerbeck@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 8. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany. Electronic address: marcandre.weber@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Digital plain radiography (DR) examinations of the pelvis are frequently performed in infants with hip dysplasia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to reduce the radiation dose and to determine objective quality control criteria to ensure accurate assessment. This seems feasible because of higher quantum efficiency of DR and easy assessable anatomical structures for most orthopaedic measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. In this prospective randomized study, 264 patients underwent X-ray examination of the pelvis with standard and reduced dose. The evaluation of the plain-radiographs was conducted using the following criteria: acetabular and center edge angle, closing of the epiphyseal plates and maturation of the femoral head. Two radiologists evaluated these criteria using a score ranging from 1 (definitely assessable) to 4 (not assessable). If a single criterion had been evaluated with a score of 3 or more points or more than 2 criteria with 2 points, the radiograph was scored as "not assessable". The statistical analysis was conducted as non-inferiority-trial. RESULTS: Five (1.9%) examined X-rays were scored as not assessable. There was no statistical inferiority between the examinations with standard (4.57 μSv) or reduced dose (3.06 μSv). Also, the individual evaluation of the defined criteria was dose-independent. CONCLUSION: The adequate evaluation of hip dysplasia in children and young adults on pelvic radiographs is possible with reduced radiation dose, by simple using an exposure class of 800 instead of 400.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Digital plain radiography (DR) examinations of the pelvis are frequently performed in infants with hip dysplasia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to reduce the radiation dose and to determine objective quality control criteria to ensure accurate assessment. This seems feasible because of higher quantum efficiency of DR and easy assessable anatomical structures for most orthopaedic measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. In this prospective randomized study, 264 patients underwent X-ray examination of the pelvis with standard and reduced dose. The evaluation of the plain-radiographs was conducted using the following criteria: acetabular and center edge angle, closing of the epiphyseal plates and maturation of the femoral head. Two radiologists evaluated these criteria using a score ranging from 1 (definitely assessable) to 4 (not assessable). If a single criterion had been evaluated with a score of 3 or more points or more than 2 criteria with 2 points, the radiograph was scored as "not assessable". The statistical analysis was conducted as non-inferiority-trial. RESULTS: Five (1.9%) examined X-rays were scored as not assessable. There was no statistical inferiority between the examinations with standard (4.57 μSv) or reduced dose (3.06 μSv). Also, the individual evaluation of the defined criteria was dose-independent. CONCLUSION: The adequate evaluation of hip dysplasia in children and young adults on pelvic radiographs is possible with reduced radiation dose, by simple using an exposure class of 800 instead of 400.