Literature DB >> 26723274

A review of reverse vaccinology approaches for the development of vaccines against ticks and tick borne diseases.

A E Lew-Tabor1, M Rodriguez Valle2.   

Abstract

The field of reverse vaccinology developed as an outcome of the genome sequence revolution. Following the introduction of live vaccinations in the western world by Edward Jenner in 1798 and the coining of the phrase 'vaccine', in 1881 Pasteur developed a rational design for vaccines. Pasteur proposed that in order to make a vaccine that one should 'isolate, inactivate and inject the microorganism' and these basic rules of vaccinology were largely followed for the next 100 years leading to the elimination of several highly infectious diseases. However, new technologies were needed to conquer many pathogens which could not be eliminated using these traditional technologies. Thus increasingly, computers were used to mine genome sequences to rationally design recombinant vaccines. Several vaccines for bacterial and viral diseases (i.e. meningococcus and HIV) have been developed, however the on-going challenge for parasite vaccines has been due to their comparatively larger genomes. Understanding the immune response is important in reverse vaccinology studies as this knowledge will influence how the genome mining is to be conducted. Vaccine candidates for anaplasmosis, cowdriosis, theileriosis, leishmaniasis, malaria, schistosomiasis, and the cattle tick have been identified using reverse vaccinology approaches. Some challenges for parasite vaccine development include the ability to address antigenic variability as well the understanding of the complex interplay between antibody, mucosal and/or T cell immune responses. To understand the complex parasite interactions with the livestock host, there is the limitation where algorithms for epitope mining using the human genome cannot directly be adapted for bovine, for example the prediction of peptide binding to major histocompatibility complex motifs. As the number of genomes for both hosts and parasites increase, the development of new algorithms for pan-genomic mining will continue to impact the future of parasite and ricketsial (and other tick borne pathogens) disease vaccine development.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse vaccinology; Tick borne diseases; Ticks; Vaccines; Veterinary

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723274     DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis        ISSN: 1877-959X            Impact factor:   3.744


  32 in total

1.  Purification of Biotinylated Cell Surface Proteins from Rhipicephalus microplus Epithelial Gut Cells.

Authors:  Thomas P Karbanowicz; Ala Lew-Tabor; Manuel Rodriguez Valle
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Serological and molecular surveys of Anaplasma spp. in Egyptian cattle reveal high A. marginale infection prevalence.

Authors:  A Selim; E Manaa; A Abdelhady; M Ben Said; A Sazmand
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.376

3.  Anti-Tick Vaccines: Current Advances and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Dennis Muhanguzi; Christian Ndekezi; Joseph Nkamwesiga; Shewit Kalayou; Sylvester Ochwo; Moses Vuyani; Magambo Phillip Kimuda
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Epidemiologic profile of hard ticks and molecular characterization of Rhipicephalus microplus infesting cattle in central part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Authors:  Samia Sultan; Jehan Zeb; Sultan Ayaz; Sadeeq Ur Rehman; Sanaullah Khan; Mubashir Hussain; Haytham Senbill; Sabir Husain; Olivier Andre Sparagano
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.383

5.  Transcriptional changes in the peripheral blood leukocytes from Brangus cattle before and after tick challenge with Rhipicephalus australis.

Authors:  Emily F Mantilla Valdivieso; Elizabeth M Ross; Ali Raza; Muhammad Noman Naseem; Muhammad Kamran; Ben J Hayes; Nicholas N Jonsson; Peter James; Ala E Tabor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.547

6.  Emergence of fipronil resistant Rhipicephalus microplus populations in Indian states.

Authors:  Mukesh Shakya; Sachin Kumar; Ashutosh Fular; Deepak Upadhaya; Anil Kumar Sharma; Nisha Bisht; Abhijit Nandi; Srikant Ghosh
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 7.  Cattle Tick Rhipicephalus microplus-Host Interface: A Review of Resistant and Susceptible Host Responses.

Authors:  Ala E Tabor; Abid Ali; Gauhar Rehman; Gustavo Rocha Garcia; Amanda Fonseca Zangirolamo; Thiago Malardo; Nicholas N Jonsson
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Risk factors associated with tick infestations on equids in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, with notes on Rickettsia massiliae detection.

Authors:  Abid Ali; Hafsa Zahid; Ismail Zeb; Muhammad Tufail; Sulaiman Khan; Muhammad Haroon; Muhammad Tufail; Muhammad Bilal; Majid Hussain; Abdulaziz S Alouffi; Sebastián Muñoz-Leal; Marcelo B Labruna
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Multiple Country and Breed Genomic Prediction of Tick Resistance in Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Fernando Flores Cardoso; Oswald Matika; Appolinaire Djikeng; Ntanganedzeni Mapholi; Heather M Burrow; Marcos Jun Iti Yokoo; Gabriel Soares Campos; Claudia Cristina Gulias-Gomes; Valentina Riggio; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Bailey Engle; Laercio Porto-Neto; Azwihangwisi Maiwashe; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Arbovirosis and potential transmission blocking vaccines.

Authors:  Berlin Londono-Renteria; Andrea Troupin; Tonya M Colpitts
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.