Literature DB >> 26722240

Peritumoral edema on magnetic resonance imaging predicts a poor clinical outcome in malignant glioma.

Chen-Xing Wu1, Guo-Shi Lin2, Zhi-Xiong Lin3, Jian-Dong Zhang4, Long Chen4, Shui-Yuan Liu4, Wen-Long Tang4, Xian-Xin Qiu4, Chang-Fu Zhou2.   

Abstract

Peritumoral edema (PTE), one of the main characteristics of malignant glioma, is a significant contributor to the morbidity and mortality from glioma, however, a recent systematic review suggested that controversy remains with regard to its prognostic value. To further determine whether PTE was a potential prognostic factor on routine pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for malignant glioma, the association between survival and PTE was investigated in the present retrospective review of 109 patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant glioma using MRI data from these routine scans. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis, and COX proportional hazards model was applied to evaluate the effect of pre-operative MRI features on OS in multivariate analysis. The PTE extent, edema shape, degree of necrosis, enhancement extent, pathological grade, patient age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and post-operative chemoradiotherapy were associated with OS in the patients with malignant glioma on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis indicated that the extent of PTE and degree of necrosis shown by pre-operative MRI were independent predictors of OS, in addition to pathological grade, patient age, KPS and post-operative chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, patients with two unfavorable factors (major edema and severe necrosis) exhibited a poorer OS compared with the remainder. In summary, PTE and degree of necrosis, which are easily determined from routine MRI, can be useful for predicting a poor clinical outcome in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glioblastoma; magnetic resonance imaging; malignant glioma; peritumoral edema; prognosis; survival

Year:  2015        PMID: 26722240      PMCID: PMC4665258          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Malignant glioma, which consists mainly of anaplastic glioma and glioblastoma (GBM), represents up to 50% of all primary brain gliomas (1) and is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. The clinical outcome in patients with malignant glioma is poor despite the improvements in survival rate since the use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy post-operatively (2). It has been reported that the prognosis of malignant glioma may be affected by several factors, including not only patient age, pre-operative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), histological grade, pathological molecular markers (such as MGMT, IDH1, 1p19q and PDGF-α) and temozolomide chemotherapy (3–7), but also certain pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features on routine scans, such as peritumoral edema (PTE) extent, degree of necrosis, enhancement extent and the size of the cyst, among others (5,8–11). However, several studies have also shown that certain features of pre-operative MRI, such as PTE, cysts and tumor size, are not independent predictors of survival in patients with glioma (12–14). PTE is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality from glioma (15), but a recent systematic review suggested that controversy remains with regard to its prognostic value (14). A requirement therefore exists to further evaluate the association between PTE on MRI and patient survival, as such data from routine imaging are irreplaceable during the formation of a pre-operative diagnosis and are now the central basis of treatment decisions in patients with glioma. Determination of clear associations between these factors has a certain instructive significance for clinical practice. In the present study, the prognostic value of MRI features from pre-operative routine scans was assessed in patients with malignant glioma in order to confirm which would be the most valuable prognostic markers, as this data may provide aid in everyday clinical activities.

Patients and methods

Patients and clinical data

The clinical and pre-operative MRI data of 109 patients treated by resection of a newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant glioma at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (Fuzhou, China) between March 2006 and September 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Patients who succumbed to non-glioma-based causes or those who received a biopsy were excluded from the study. No patients received corticosteroids at the time of the pre-operative MRI scan. For all patients, the tumor was confirmed to be totally resected using post-operative enhanced MRI within 3 days. According to the principles of the World Health Organization classification (16), the histological diagnosis and grading of each patient were reaffirmed. In total, 65 cases were classified as GBM (grade 4) and 44 as anaplastic glioma (grade 3), consisting of anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma and anaplastic oligoastrocytoma. In the cohort, 65 patients were male and 44 were female. The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range, 18–78 years). The median pre-operative KPS of the patients was 80 (range, 70–100). Post-operatively, 53 patients were treated with standard chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy plus chemotherapy) and 56 were treated with non-standard chemoradiotherapy (17) (radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, and no radiotherapy or chemotherapy). Oral temozolomide chemotherapy (150–200 mg/m2/day) was administered for 4–6 cycles unless mortality or irreversible hematological toxicity occurred. Radiotherapy was administered to the contrast-enhanced lesion plus the area of the PTE and a 2-cm margin (60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions). All patients were followed up via telephone conversations or outpatient visits. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time (months) between the primary surgical resection and mortality or the latest follow-up. This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University and conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was provided by all patients.

Classification of MRI features

For all patients, pre-operative MRI data from routine scans, including T1-weighted (W), T2-W and contrast-enhanced T1-W sequences were available. The unidimensional maximum diameter (cm) was used for measuring the tumor size on the T1-W images, and the median tumor size was recorded as 5.0 cm (range, 2.3–9.0 cm). The bright T2-W signal region surrounding the tumor was defined as PTE, which was estimated based on the maximum distance from the tumor margin to the outer edge of the edema, and was graded into minor (Fig. 1A) and major (Fig. 1B) types (5). According to the method reported by Hartmann et al (18), the morphological classification of PTE was performed on the basis of the T2-W images (Fig. 1A and B). Necrosis, which was estimated on the axial contrast-enhanced T1-W images (19), was demonstrated when a region had a high signal intensity on T2-W images, but a low signal intensity on T1-W images, and an irregular enhancing border on contrast-enhanced images (Fig. 1C and D). Enhancement was defined as not marked or marked when the enhancement signal was less than (Fig. 1E) or similar to (Fig. 1F) the signal intensity of fat, respectively. Cysts (Fig. 1G and H) were defined as rounded regions that exhibited low intensity T1-W signals and extremely high intensity T2-W signals matching the cerebrospinal fluid signal. Additionally, the regions presented with a thin, smooth, regular, slightly enhancing or non-enhancing wall (9). The specific classification of the imaging features is listed in Table I and an example of this classification is presented in Fig. 2. According to these aforementioned classification methods, the imaging data of all the patients were analyzed independently by two experienced radiologists who were blinded to the patient's clinical information.
Figure 1.

Example of classification of imaging features (arrows). (A) Minor edema (<1 cm) and the rounded edema shape shown by T2-W MRI. (B) Major edema (≥1 cm) and the irregular shape of edema shown by T2-W MRI. (C-H) Contrast-enhanced T1-W images showing (C) mild necrosis (≤50%), (D) severe necrosis (>50%), (E) no marked enhancement, (F) marked enhancement, (G) a small cyst and (H) a large cyst. T2-W MRI, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Table I.

Specific classification of imaging features.

Imaging featuresClassification criteria
PTE
  MinorPTE extending <1 cm from tumor margin
  MajorPTE extending ≥1 cm from tumor margin
Edema shape
  RoundedThe edema shape is rounded and is not radial
  IrregularThe edema shape tends to be irregular, e.g., finger-like or radial shapes
Necrosis
  NoNo necrosis within the tumor
  MildNecrosis affecting ≤50% of the tumor
  SevereNecrosis affecting >50% of the tumor
Cyst
  NoNo cyst in the tumor
  SmallCyst cavity in ≤50% of the total tumor
  LargeCyst cavity in >50% of the total tumor
Enhancement
  No markedEnhancement signal is less than the signal intensity of fat
  MarkedEnhancement signal is similar to the signal intensity of fat
Tumor crosses midline
  NoTumor is limited to the unilateral cerebral hemisphere
  YesTumor crosses the brain midline and extends into the other side of the cerebral hemisphere
Edema crosses midline
  NoPTE extent is limited to the unilateral cerebral hemisphere
  YesPTE extent crosses the brain midline and is not confined to the unilateral cerebral hemisphere
Size, cm
  <5The maximum diameter of the tumor is <5 cm
  ≥5The maximum diameter of the tumor is ≥5 cm
Figure 2.

Correlations between (A) PTE, (B) necrosis, (C) enhancement, (D) edema shape, (E) major PTE and severe necrosis, (F) age, (G) grade and (H) chemoradiotherapy, and overall survival in the entire cohort (Kaplan-Meier curves). (E) a, the group with two unfavorable factors (major PTE and severe necrosis); b, the group with only one unfavorable factor (major PTE or severe necrosis); c, the group without major PTE and severe necrosis. PTE, peritumoral edema.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) was applied for the statistical analysis. For the univariate analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, which were compared by the log-rank test. Factors that were statistically significant on the univariate analysis were analyzed on multivariate analysis. COX proportional hazards model and stepwise regression analysis were applied to estimate the effect of pre-operative MRI features on survival in the multivariate analysis. P≤0.05 (two-sided) was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

PTE

Univariate analysis (Table II) showed that patients with major PTE survived a significantly shorter amount of time than those with minor PTE (P<0.0001; Fig. 2A); the median OS time was 14.0 and 44.0 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis (Table III) indicated that the PTE extent shown by pre-operative MRI was an independent prognostic factor in patients with malignant glioma [P=0.029; hazard ratio (HR), 2.337].
Table II.

Variables associated with OS in the entire cohort: Univariate analysis.

OS, months

VariableNumber of casesMedian95% CIP-value
Total10915.011.2–18.8
Gender0.357
  Male  6515.010.2–19.8
  Female  4416.0  9.8–22.2
Age, years<0.0001
  ≥60  2911.0  8.6–13.4
  <60  8021.016.2–25.8
KPS<0.0001
  ≤80  4213.010.6–16.8
  >80  6726.016.2–30.8
Chemoradiotherapy0.004
  Standard  5321.016.1–26.0
  Non-standard  5612.0  8.1–15.9
Pathological grade<0.0001
  Grade 3  4428.0  8.0–54.0
  Grade 4  6512.0  9.5–14.5
PTE<0.0001
  Minor  3444.020.4–67.6
  Major  7514.012.3–15.7
Edema shape<0.0001
  Rounded  4328.0  7.0–49.0
  Irregular  6614.010.7–17.3
Necrosis<0.0001
  None  3342.025.3–58.7
  Mild  4314.0  8.2–19.8
  Severe  3310.0  6.1–14.0
Cyst0.593
  None  7116.010.1–21.9
  Small  2215.011.6–18.4
  Large  1615.0  7.3–22.7
Enhancement<0.0001
  No marked  5029.012.1–45.9
  Marked  5913.0  9.4–16.6
Tumor crosses midline0.762
  No  8915.011.6–18.4
  Yes  2021.0  9.0–33.0
Edema crosses midline0.220
  No  7717.012.7–21.3
  Yes  3213.0  9.2–16.8
Size, cm0.467
  <5  6515.012.4–17.6
  ≥5  4419.010.7–27.3

OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval.

Table III.

Statistically significant prognosis indicators evaluated by multivariate analysis in the entire cohort.

VariablesHazard ratio95% CIP-value
PTE2.3371.089–5.0150.029
Necrosis2.2181.447–3.401<0.0001
Pathological grade2.0661.150–3.7130.015
Age, years1.9541.137–3.3580.015
KPS1.8921.230–3.3710.023
Chemoradiotherapy0.4810.287–0.8060.005

PTE, peritumoral edema; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; CI, confidence interval.

Necrosis

The degree of necrosis on pre-operative MRI was also an independent prognostic factor in malignant glioma (P<0.0001; HR, 2.218), with a median OS time of 42.0, 14.0 and 10.0 months for patients with no, mild and severe necrosis, respectively (P<0.0001; Fig. 2B). Additionally, the prognosis in the patients with two unfavorable factors (major edema and severe necrosis) was markedly poor compared with those with only one unfavorable factor and those without unfavorable factors (P<0.0001; Fig 2E), with median OS times of 10.0, 15.0 and 44.0 months, respectively.

Other imaging features

On univariate analysis, a significant difference (P<0.0001; Fig. 2C) was indicated between the patients with no marked enhancement and those with marked enhancement, with median OS times of 29.0 and 13.0 months, respectively. However, multivariate analysis showed that the extent of enhancement was not an independent prognostic factor. Similarly, a significant difference (P<0.0001; Fig. 2D) existed among patients with edema of rounded and irregular shapes, with median OS times of 28.0 and 14.0 months, respectively However, multivariate analysis failed to confirm this significance. In addition, univariate analysis showed that cysts (P=0.593), tumor crossing the midline (P=0.762), edema crossing the midline (P=0.220) and tumor size (P=0.467) were not significantly associated with the prognosis in malignant glioma.

Association between gender, age, KPS or pathological grade and patient prognosis

Gender did not affect the clinical outcome (P=0.357), but age (P<0.0001; Fig. 2F), KPS (P<0.0001), pathological grade (P<0.0001; Fig. 2G) and post-operative chemoradiotherapy (P=0.004; Fig. 2H) were correlated with patient survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that age (P=0.015), KPS (P=0.023), pathological grade (P=0.015) and chemoradiotherapy (P=0.005) were all independent prognostic factors in the patients with malignant glioma.

Discussion

In the clinic, MRI is a routine examination for central nervous system diseases, and in particular, for the pre-operative diagnosis of glioma. Moreover, different signs shown by pre-operative MRI reflect the different biological behaviors of glioma. An improved understanding of the correlation between pre-operative MRI features and survival is therefore critical to clinical practice. The present study retrospectively analyzed several pre-operative MRI features, and found that PTE and necrosis were statistically significant unfavorable prognosis indicators affecting OS in patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant glioma. PTE, one of the main characteristics of malignant glioma, is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality from glioma (15). The present study found that patients with major PTE exhibited a significantly worse OS time, and that PTE was an independent prognosis indicator. This may be associated with the fact that the glioma cells infiltrate the peritumoral area (20). Moreover, a recent study discovered a population of glioma stem cells infiltrating the area of PTE (21), and it has been found that these cells, which exhibit resistance to therapy, are the source of tumor recurrence (22–24). These data have provided convincing evidence that PTE is an indicator of an adverse prognosis in malignant glioma. However, a recent systematic review (14) suggested that the association between pre-operative PTE and survival in patients with glioma remains a controversial topic; one explanation may be that considerable heterogeneity exists in terms of patient clinical characteristics and the MRI technology used in these studies. Another factor that is inconsistent between the studies is the discrepancy in the measurement and classification of PTE. The present study also showed that patients with a rounded edema shape survived longer than those with an irregular edema shape, but multivariate analysis indicated that edema shape was not an independent predictor of prognosis. We speculate that edema extent may contribute to the result that edema shape affects patient survival, as this is consistent with the phenomenon observed in the clinic where PTE extent in patients with an irregular edema shape (such as a radial or finger-like shape) tends to be severe. Necrosis is one of the pathological characteristics of malignant glioma. Previous studies have suggested that tumor necrosis extent is associated with a poor clinical outcome in malignant glioma (8,25,26). The present study also found that tumor necrosis shown by pre-operative MRI was an independent unfavorable prognosis factor. This may be associated with the malignant biological behaviors of glioma cells in necrotic areas. The rapid cellular proliferation of malignant glioma causes nutrient imbalance, which leads to hypoxia and necrosis in tumor tissue. Necrotic areas are typically surrounded by pseudopalisading cells, which are relatively unique to malignant glioma and have long been considered as an unfavorable prognostic indicator (27). Moreover, the pseudopalisading cells show a more hypoxic nature (28), which not only is suspected to contribute to glioma development and progress (29), but also would promote tumor recurrence, and improve the invasion ability and resistance to radiochemotherapy (30). It was previously believed that enhancement on pre-operative MRI was an independent predictor of survival in malignant glioma (8,25). However, in the present study, the enhancement extent was associated with the OS of the patients with malignant glioma on univariate analysis, while it failed to retain its significance on multivariate analysis. One proposed explanation is that the enhancement of brain tumors mainly reflects the breakdown of the blood brain barrier and is affected by all processes that increase or decrease the abnormal permeability, regardless of the size and activity of tumor (31). Previous studies showed that cysts were associated with a better prognosis in low-grade glioma (32,33). It is likely that this is since cyst formation represents more indolent neoplasm growth and therefore, improved survival (12). Nevertheless, the present study found that cysts did not affect the clinical outcome in patients with malignant glioma, which is in accordance with a previous large-scale study (12). The proposed hypothesis holds that cyst formation is associated with a disturbed blood brain barrier (34) or malignant transformation of a glioma (35). However, the exact mechanism of cyst formation remains unknown and requires further research. Additionally, it has been reported that age and pathological grade are independent predictors of prognosis in malignant glioma (3,4), which is confirmed by the present results. We speculate that it may be due to the biological characteristics of patient at different age groups and the biological behaviors of glioma cells with different pathological grades. In the present study, post-operative standard chemotherapy plus radiotherapy was able to prolong the survival time of the malignant glioma patients, in accordance with the results of previous studies (2,36). Therefore, we advocate that standard chemoradiotherapy for patients with malignant glioma should be actively pursued post-operatively. However, a number of limitations that should be acknowledged exist in the present study. Firstly, this is a retrospective study, which may inevitably be subject to bias for information collection and patient selection. Moreover, the sample size is small in the study. Therefore, the association between pre-operative MRI features and prognosis in patients with supratentorial malignant glioma requires further analysis through large-scale and prospective studies, and particularly, the key molecular mechanisms of those independent predictors of survival require identification. In conclusion, PTE and necrosis shown by MRI on pre-operative routine scans are independent indicators of an unfavorable prognosis, and patients with major edema plus severe necrosis exhibit a poorer prognosis, thereby indicating that PTE and extent of necrosis on routine MRI scans can be used to predict OS in patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant glioma.
  36 in total

1.  Morphological and flow cytometric analysis of cell infiltration in glioblastoma: a comparison of autopsy brain and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Takahiro Yamahara; Yoshihiro Numa; Tetsuya Oishi; Takuya Kawaguchi; Toshitaka Seno; Akio Asai; Keiji Kawamoto
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M A Hammoud; R Sawaya; W Shi; P F Thall; N E Leeds
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Glioblastoma multiforme: Molecular characterization and current treatment strategy (Review).

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Wei Zhang; Wei-Dong Cao; Gang Cheng; Yong-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Gliomas: correlation of histologic grade, Ki67 and p53 expression with patient survival.

Authors:  Huma Arshad; Zubair Ahmad; Sheema H Hasan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Temozolomide and radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review.

Authors:  Li-Juan Yang; Chang-Fu Zhou; Zhi-Xiong Lin
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 6.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas.

Authors:  Dieta Brandsma; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 7.  Targeting role of glioma stem cells for glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  X Zhang; W Zhang; X G Mao; H N Zhen; W D Cao; S J Hu
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Invasive tumor cells and prognosis in a selected population of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Annunziato Mangiola; Pasquale de Bonis; Giulio Maira; Mario Balducci; Gigliola Sica; Gina Lama; Libero Lauriola; Carmelo Anile
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Supratentorial low-grade astrocytoma. Correlation of computed tomography findings with effect of radiation therapy and prognostic variables.

Authors:  Y Shibamoto; Y Kitakabu; M Takahashi; J Yamashita; Y Oda; H Kikuchi; M Abe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Yanjiao Li; Tzong-Shiue Yu; Renée M McKay; Dennis K Burns; Steven G Kernie; Luis F Parada
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Volumetric quantification of glioblastoma: experiences with different measurement techniques and impact on survival.

Authors:  Christian Henker; Thomas Kriesen; Änne Glass; Björn Schneider; Jürgen Piek
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Improved Survival with Decreased Wait Time to Surgery in Glioblastoma Patients Presenting with Seizure.

Authors:  Patrick M Flanigan; Arman Jahangiri; Ruby Kuang; Albert Truong; Sarah Choi; Alvin Chou; Jonathan W Rick; Susan M Chang; Annette M Molinaro; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Up-regulation of LINC00665 contributes to the progression of glioma and correlates with its MRI characteristics.

Authors:  Wangsheng Chen; Lan Hong; Changlong Hou; Genlin Zong; Jianhua Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  IL-13 receptor α2 stimulates human glioma cell growth and metastasis through the Src/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

Authors:  Ming Tu; Wei Wange; Lin Cai; Penglei Zhu; Zhichao Gao; Weiming Zheng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-09-14

5.  MR Imaging Characteristics Associate with Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Glioblastoma and Provide an Improved Signature for Survival Prognostication.

Authors:  J Zhou; M V Reddy; B K J Wilson; D A Blair; A Taha; C M Frampton; R A Eiholzer; P Y C Gan; F Ziad; Z Thotathil; S Kirs; N A Hung; J A Royds; T L Slatter
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  An Improvement of Survival Stratification in Glioblastoma Patients via Combining Subregional Radiomics Signatures.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yu Han; Xintao Hu; Wen Wang; Guangbin Cui; Lei Guo; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Application of intraoperative B-mode ultrasound and shear wave elastography for glioma grading.

Authors:  Lu Yin; Linggang Cheng; Fumin Wang; Xueli Zhu; Yue Hua; Wen He
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

8.  Long Noncoding RNA miR210HG as a Potential Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Glioma.

Authors:  Weijie Min; Dongwei Dai; Jiaqi Wang; Dandan Zhang; Yuhui Zhang; Guosheng Han; Lei Zhang; Chao Chen; Xiulong Li; Yanan Li; Zhijian Yue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expression and prognostic significance of CTBP2 in human gliomas.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Shusheng Che; Gang Cai; Yuchao He; Jialei Chen; Wei Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Suppression of CLC-3 chloride channel reduces the aggressiveness of glioma through inhibiting nuclear factor-κB pathway.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Jing Xie; Hai-Yong He; En-Wen Huang; Qing-Hua Cao; Lun Luo; Yong-Shi Liao; Ying Guo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.