Literature DB >> 26721864

Septal flash and septal rebound stretch have different underlying mechanisms.

John Walmsley1, Peter R Huntjens2, Frits W Prinzen3, Tammo Delhaas3, Joost Lumens2.   

Abstract

Abnormal left-right motion of the interventricular septum in early systole, known as septal flash (SF), is frequently observed in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Transseptal pressure gradient and early active septal contraction have been proposed as explanations for SF. Similarities in timing (early systole) and location (septum) suggest that SF may be related to septal systolic rebound stretch (SRSsept). We aimed to clarify the mechanisms generating SF and SRSsept. The CircAdapt computer model was used to isolate the effects of timing of activation of the left ventricular free wall (LVFW), right ventricular free wall (RVFW), and septum on SF and SRSsept. LVFW and septal activation times were varied by ±80 ms relative to RVFW activation time. M-mode-derived wall motions and septal strains were computed and used to quantify SF and SRSsept, respectively. SF depended on early activation of the RVFW relative to the LVFW. SF and SRSsept occurred in LBBB-like simulations and against a rising transseptal pressure gradient. When the septum was activated before both LVFW and RVFW, no SF occurred despite the presence of SRSsept. Computer simulations therefore indicate that SF and SRSsept have different underlying mechanisms, even though both can occur in LBBB. The mechanism of leftward motion during SF is early RVFW contraction pulling on and straightening the septum when unopposed by the LVFW. SRSsept is caused by late LVFW contraction following early contraction of the septum. Changes in transseptal pressure gradient are not the main cause of SF in LBBB.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac mechanics; computer modeling; echocardiography; left bundle branch block; ventricular interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26721864     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00639.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance features of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Giselle Revah; Vincent Wu; Peter R Huntjens; Eve Piekarski; Janice Y Chyou; Leon Axel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Tracking Early Systolic Motion for Assessing Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Real Time.

Authors:  Manuel Villegas-Martinez; Magnus Reinsfelt Krogh; Øyvind S Andersen; Ole Jakob Sletten; Ali Wajdan; Hans Henrik Odland; Ole Jakob Elle; Espen W Remme
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  A rapid electromechanical model to predict reverse remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Pim J A Oomen; Thien-Khoi N Phung; Seth H Weinberg; Kenneth C Bilchick; Jeffrey W Holmes
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 5.  Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Nathan W Kong; Gaurav A Upadhyay
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.755

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.