Literature DB >> 26721226

Standardizing the Definition of Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy-What Prostate Specific Antigen Cut Point Best Predicts a Durable Increase and Subsequent Systemic Progression?

Amir Toussi1, Suzanne B Stewart-Merrill1, Stephen A Boorjian1, Sarah P Psutka1, R Houston Thompson1, Igor Frank1, Matthew K Tollefson1, Matthew T Gettman1, Rachel E Carlson2, Laureano J Rangel2, R Jeffrey Karnes3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multiple definitions of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer exist after radical prostatectomy, and variation continues in prostate cancer outcome reporting and secondary treatment initiation. We reviewed long-term prostatectomy outcomes to assess the most appropriate prostate specific antigen cut point that predicts future disease progression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 13,512 patients with cT1-2N0M0 prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 2010. Single prostate specific antigen cut points of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 ng/ml or greater, as well as confirmatory prostate specific antigen value definitions of 0.2 ng/ml or greater followed by prostate specific antigen greater than 0.2 ng/ml and 0.4 ng/ml or greater followed by prostate specific antigen greater than 0.4 ng/ml were tested. Continued prostate specific antigen increase after a designated cut point definition was estimated using cumulative incidence. The strength of association between biochemical recurrence definitions and subsequent systemic progression were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models and the O'Quigley event based R(2) test.
RESULTS: At a median postoperative followup of 9.1 years (IQR 4.9-14.3) a detectable prostate specific antigen developed in 5,041 patients and systemic progression developed in 512. After reaching the prostate specific antigen cut point of 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 ng/ml, the percentage of patients experiencing a continued prostate specific antigen increase over 5 years was 61%, 67% and 74%, respectively, plateauing at 0.4 ng/ml. The strongest association between biochemical recurrence and systemic progression occurred using a single prostate specific antigen cut point of 0.4 ng/ml or greater (HR 36, R(2) 0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: A prostate specific antigen cut point of 0.4 ng/ml or greater reflects the threshold at which a prostate specific antigen increase becomes durable and shows the strongest correlation with subsequent systemic progression. Consideration should be given to using a prostate specific antigen of 0.4 ng/ml or greater as the standard biochemical recurrence definition after radical prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostate-specific antigen; prostatectomy; recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26721226     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  3-T multiparametric MRI characteristics of prostate cancer patients suspicious for biochemical recurrence after primary focal cryosurgery (hemiablation).

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Corinne C Liu; Kaitlin E Kosinski; David J Habibian; Anthony T Corcoran; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Current prostate cancer treatment: Not what but when?

Authors:  Peter A Massaro; Ilias Cagiannos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  PSA kinetics following primary focal cryotherapy (hemiablation) in organ-confined prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Shahidul Islam; Alfred K Mbah; Daniel M Halpern; Glenn T Werneburg; Kaitlin E Kosinski; Connie Chen; David J Habibian; Jeffrey T Schiff; Anthony T Corcoran; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Management of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: molecular imaging perspective.

Authors:  Alberto Martinez Lorca
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy adversely affects urinary continence irrespective of radiotherapy regime.

Authors:  J N Nyarangi-Dix; J Steimer; T Bruckner; H Jakobi; S A Koerber; B Hadaschik; J Debus; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Tissue-Based MicroRNAs as Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy: What Can We Learn from Past Studies?

Authors:  Zhongwei Zhao; Carsten Stephan; Sabine Weickmann; Monika Jung; Glen Kristiansen; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: what does it mean?

Authors:  Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa; Victor Srougi; Igor Nunes-Silva; Mohammed Baghdadi; Gregory Rembeyo; Sophie S Eiffel; Eric Barret; Francois Rozet; Marc Galiano; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 8.  Surrogate endpoints in early prostate cancer research.

Authors:  Scott Williams
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-06

9.  Elective pelvic irradiation in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Changhoon Song; Sang Jun Byun; Young Seok Kim; Hanjong Ahn; Seok-Soo Byun; Choung-Soo Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Jae-Sung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does obesity impact bladder cancer prognosis?-a long-lasting debate.

Authors:  Fabrizio Dal Moro; Michele Colicchia
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.