Literature DB >> 26720813

Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.

Duncan Taylor1, Damien Abarno2, Tacha Hicks3, Christophe Champod4.   

Abstract

The evaluation of forensic evidence can occur at any level within the hierarchy of propositions depending on the question being asked and the amount and type of information that is taken into account within the evaluation. Commonly DNA evidence is reported given propositions that deal with the sub-source level in the hierarchy, which deals only with the possibility that a nominated individual is a source of DNA in a trace (or contributor to the DNA in the case of a mixed DNA trace). We explore the use of information obtained from examinations, presumptive and discriminating tests for body fluids, DNA concentrations and some case circumstances within a Bayesian network in order to provide assistance to the Courts that have to consider propositions at source level. We use a scenario in which the presence of blood is of interest as an exemplar and consider how DNA profiling results and the potential for laboratory error can be taken into account. We finish with examples of how the results of these reports could be presented in court using either numerical values or verbal descriptions of the results.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bayesian networks; Body fluid; Hierarchy of propositions; Likelihood ratio; Presumptive tests; STRmix; Source level propositions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26720813     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  2 in total

1.  Assigning forensic body fluids to donors in mixed body fluids by targeted RNA/DNA deep sequencing of coding region SNPs.

Authors:  S Ingold; G Dørum; E Hanson; J Ballantyne; C Haas
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  GITAD 2020: quality assurance test through 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Álvarez; Christian Haarkötter; María Saiz; Xiomara Gálvez; María Isabel Medina-Lozano; José Antonio Lorente
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.791

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.