Nazanin Alavi1, Nasreen Roberts2, Chloe Sutton3, Nicholas Axas4, Leanne Repetti5. 1. Psychiatry Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 2. Head and Chair, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 3. Research Assistant, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. 4. Social Worker, Urgent Consult Clinic, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Ontario. 5. Registered Nurse, Urgent Consult Clinic, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of bullying victimization among adolescents referred for urgent psychiatric consultation, to study the association between bullying victimization and suicidality, and to examine the relation between different types of bullying and suicidality. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all adolescents referred to a hospital-based urgent consultation clinic. Our study sample consisted of adolescents with a history of bullying victimization. The Research Ethics Board of Queen's University provided approval. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS (IBM SPSS Inc, Armonk, NY). Chi-square tests were used for sex, suicidal ideation, history of physical and sexual abuse, and time and type of bullying, and an independent sample t test was used for age. RESULTS: The prevalence of bullying victimization was 48.5% (182 of 375). There was a significant association between being bullied and suicidal ideation (P = 0.01), and between sex and suicidal ideation (P ≤ 0.001). Victims of cyberbullying reported more suicidal ideation than those who experienced physical or verbal bullying (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Bullying victimization, especially cyberbullying, is associated with increased risk of suicidal ideation among adolescents referred for psychiatric risk assessment. The detailed history of the type and duration of bullying experienced by the victims should be considered when conducting a psychiatric risk assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of bullying victimization among adolescents referred for urgent psychiatric consultation, to study the association between bullying victimization and suicidality, and to examine the relation between different types of bullying and suicidality. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all adolescents referred to a hospital-based urgent consultation clinic. Our study sample consisted of adolescents with a history of bullying victimization. The Research Ethics Board of Queen's University provided approval. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS (IBM SPSS Inc, Armonk, NY). Chi-square tests were used for sex, suicidal ideation, history of physical and sexual abuse, and time and type of bullying, and an independent sample t test was used for age. RESULTS: The prevalence of bullying victimization was 48.5% (182 of 375). There was a significant association between being bullied and suicidal ideation (P = 0.01), and between sex and suicidal ideation (P ≤ 0.001). Victims of cyberbullying reported more suicidal ideation than those who experienced physical or verbal bullying (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Bullying victimization, especially cyberbullying, is associated with increased risk of suicidal ideation among adolescents referred for psychiatric risk assessment. The detailed history of the type and duration of bullying experienced by the victims should be considered when conducting a psychiatric risk assessment.
Authors: Michal Molcho; Wendy Craig; Pernille Due; William Pickett; Yossi Harel-Fisch; Mary Overpeck Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Wendy Craig; Yossi Harel-Fisch; Haya Fogel-Grinvald; Suzanne Dostaler; Jorn Hetland; Bruce Simons-Morton; Michal Molcho; Margarida Gaspar de Mato; Mary Overpeck; Pernille Due; William Pickett Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Ann John; Alexander Charles Glendenning; Amanda Marchant; Paul Montgomery; Anne Stewart; Sophie Wood; Keith Lloyd; Keith Hawton Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Kelly A Aschbrenner; John A Naslund; Elizabeth F Tomlinson; Allison Kinney; Sarah I Pratt; Mary F Brunette Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2019-07-02