| Literature DB >> 26719796 |
Moi Lin Ling1, Anucha Apisarnthanarak2, Le Thi Anh Thu3, Victoria Villanueva4, Costy Pandjaitan5, Mohamad Yasim Yusof6.
Abstract
This document is an executive summary of APSIC Guidelines for Environmental Cleaning and Decontamination. It describes best practices in routine cleaning and decontamination in healthcare facilities as well as in specific settings e.g. management of patients with isolation precautions, food preparation areas, construction and renovation, and following a flood. It recommends the implementation of environmental hygiene program to keep the environment safe for patients, staff and visitors visiting a healthcare facility. Objective assessment of cleanliness and quality is an essential component of this program as a method for identifying quality improvement opportunities. Recommendations for safe handling of linen and bedding; as well as occupational health and safety issues are included in the guidelines. A training program is vital to ensure consistent adherence to best practices.Entities:
Keywords: Decontamination; Environmental cleaning; Environmental hygiene
Year: 2015 PMID: 26719796 PMCID: PMC4696151 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-015-0099-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ISSN: 2047-2994 Impact factor: 4.887
Categories for strength of each recommendation
| Categories for strength of each recommendation | |
|---|---|
| CATEGORY | DEFINITION |
| A | Good evidence to support a recommendation for use |
| B | Moderate evidence to support a recommendation for use. |
| C | Insufficient evidence to support a recommendation for or against use |
| D | Moderate evidence to support a recommendation against use. |
| E | Good evidence to support a recommendation against use. |
| Categories for quality of evidence on which recommendations are made | |
| GRADE | DEFINITION |
| I | Evidence from at least one properly randomized, controlled trial. |
| II | Evidence from at least one well-designed clinical trial without randomization, from cohort or case-controlled analytic studies, preferably from more than one centre, from multiple time series, or from dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments. |
| III | Evidence from opinions of respected authorities on the basis of clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. |
Risk Stratification Matrix to determine the frequency of cleaning (example)
| Discipline | Probability of contamination | Potential for Exposure | Population | Total score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light :1 | High-touch : 3 | Less susceptible:0 | ||
| Moderate: 2 | Low -touch:1 | More susceptible: 1 | ||
| Heavy: 3 | ||||
| Renal | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Burns | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Respiratory Medicine | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| General Medicine | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Colorectal Surgery | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Oncology | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Neurology and Neurosurgery | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Surgical Intensive Care Unit | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| Medical Intensive Care Unit | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
Interpretation of total score: 7: High risk: clean after each case/event/procedure and at least twice per day, clean additionally as required; 4–6: Moderate Risk : clean at least once daily, clean additionally as required (e.g. Gross soiling), 2–3 : Low risk: clean according to a fixed scheduled, clean additionally as required (e.g. Gross soiling)
STEP 1: Identify The Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA). TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OR PROJECT (circle type of project)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STEP 2: Using the following Table, identify the patient risk groups affected by the activity. If more than one risk group will be affected, select the higher risk group. RISK GROUPS. IDENTIFY PATIENT AT RISK (circle area involved)
| LOW RISK | MEDIUM RISK | HIGH RISK | HIGHER RISK |
| • All office area | ▪ Admitting Unit | ▪ Trauma & Emergency Department | ▪ Bone Marrow Transplant Unit |
STEP 3: Match the planned Construction activity type (A,B,C,D) with the Patient Risk Group (low, medium, high, highest) to determine the Class of Precautions (1, 11, 111,1 V) or level of infection control activities required. RISK CLASS DETERMINATION
| PATIENT RISK GROUPS | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY |
| TYPE A | TYPE B | TYPE C | TYPE D | |
| Low Risk | 1 | 11 | 11 | 111/ 1 V |
| Medium Risk | 1 | 11 | 111 or 11 | 1 V |
| High Risk | 1 | 11 or III | 111/ 1 V | 1 V |
| Highest Risk | 11 or I-III | 111/ 1 V | 111/ 1 V | 1 V |
Description of Required Infection Control Precautions by class: Refer Appendix A3.1 and 3.2
Description of Required Infection Control Precautions by Class
| Pre-Construction | During Construction of Project | Upon Completion of Project | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1. Execute work by methods to minimize raising dust from construction operations | Clean work area upon completion of task. | |
|
| 1. Identify the type of construction project | 1. Provide active means to prevent airborne dust from dispersing into atmosphere. | 1. Contain construction waste before transport in tightly covered containers. |
|
| 1. Identify the type of construction project | 1. Remove or isolate air handling system in area where work is being done to prevent contamination of duct system. | 1. Do not remove barriers from work area until completed project is inspected by the Department of Engineering, Department of Infection Control, and thoroughly cleaned by Department of Facilities. |
|
| 1. Identify the type of construction project | 1. Isolate air handling system in area where work is being done to prevent contamination of duct system. | 1. Do not remove barriers from work area until completed project is inspected by Department of Engineering, Department of Infection Control and thoroughly cleaned by Department of Facilities |
| Pre-Construction | During Construction Project | Upon Completion Project | |
|
| 1. Put on air conditioning full blast for 2 days |