| Literature DB >> 26719744 |
Qiuyun Lin1, Wenyan Wang1, Yakun Ren1, Yimei Jiang1, Ailing Sun1, Ying Qian1, Yifei Zhang1, Niqing He1, Ngo Thi Hang1, Zhou Liu1, Linfang Li1, Linglong Liu1, Ling Jiang1, Jianmin Wan2.
Abstract
Seed storability in rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important agronomic trait. Two segregating populations with N22 (indica) as a common parent, viz. a set of 122 backcross-inbred lines (BILs) derived from the backcross Nanjing35 (japonica)/N22//Nanjing35 and another population comprising 189 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the cross of USSR5 (japonica) and N22, were studied to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling seed storability. Germination percentage (GP) was used to evaluate seed storability after aging treated under three different conditions, viz. natural, artificial and combined aging treatments. A total of seven QTLs were identified on chromosomes 1, 2, 5, 6 and 9. Among them, a major QTL, qSSn-9, was common in the two populations. In contrast, four QTLs (qSSnj-2-1, qSSn-2-2, qSSn-5 and qSSn-6) were detected in BILs and the QTL qSSn-1 was identified in RILs, which was a new QTL for seed storability. The N22-derived alleles increased the seed storability at all the loci except qSSnj-2-1. We also investigated the effect of QTLs using five selected lines with high storability from BILs and verified qSSn-5 with a near-isogenic line (NIL). These results provide an opportunity for pyramiding or map-based cloning major QTLs for seed storability in rice.Entities:
Keywords: artificial aging; backcross inbred lines (BILs); natural aging; quantitative trait locus (QTL); recombinant inbred lines (RILs); rice (Oryza sativa L.); seed storability
Year: 2015 PMID: 26719744 PMCID: PMC4671702 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.65.411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Different treatment methods before seed storability measurement for Nanjing35/N22//Nanjing35 BILs and USSR5/N22 RILs
| Code | Population | Aging methods | Year | Treated conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-A-10 | BIL | Artificial aging | 2010 | 40°C and 80% RH for 35 days |
| R-A-12 | RIL | 2012 | 40°C and 85% RH for 38 days | |
| B-N-09 | BIL | Natural aging | 2009 | Room temperature (<30°C) and 40–60% RH in Nanjing for 32 months |
| R-N-09 | RIL | 2009 | Room temperature (<30°C) and 40–60% RH in Nanjing for 32 months | |
| B-C-09 | BIL | Combined aging | 2009 | 40°C and 80% RH for 10 days based on stored for 32 months |
| R-C-11 | RIL | 2011 | 40°C and 80% RH for 35 days based on stored for 12 months |
Fig. 1Response of parental accessions to different artificial aging treatment times (days). (A) Germination of Nanjing35 (left), USSR5 (middle), and N22 (right) without aging treatments. (B) Germination of Nanjing35 (left), USSR5 (middle), and N22 (right) after artificial aging treatment for 38 days in 2012. (C) Response of Nanjing35 and N22 to different artificial aging treatment times (days) in 2010. (D) Response of USSR5 and N22 to different artificial aging days in 2012. Solid, short broken and long broken lines indicate GPs for N22, USSR5, and Nanjing35, respectively. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. Asterisk means significant at the 0.05 probability level.
Fig. 2Frequency distributions of GPs after aging treatments in Nanjing35/N22//Nanjing35 BILs and USSR5/N22 RILs. (A–C) represent frequency distributions of GPs in Nanjing35/N22//Nanjing35 BILs after artificial aging for 35 days in 2010, natural aging for 32 months in 2009, and combined aging treatment in 2009, abbreviated as treatment B-A-10, B-N-09, and B-C-09, respectively. (D–F) represent frequency distributions of GPs in USSR5/N22 RILs after artificial aging for 38 days in 2012, natural aging for 32 months in 2009, and combined aging treatment in 2011, abbreviated as treatment R-A-12, R-N-09, and R-C-11, respectively. GPs of the parents are indicated by arrows.
Location and genetic effects of QTL for seed storability in Nanjing35/N22//Nanjing35 BILs and USSR5/N22 RILs after aging treatments
| Population | Aging treatments | QTL name | Chromosome | Marker interval | LOD score | PVE (%) | Additive effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIL | B-A-10 | 2 | RM324-RM262 | 4.1 | 12.3 | −9.3 | |
| 2 | RM526-RM240 | 3.8 | 11.4 | 8.8 | |||
| 9 | RM7038-RM105 | 3.7 | 12.2 | 10.4 | |||
| B-N-09 | 5 | RM421-RM26 | 5.3 | 15.0 | 9.0 | ||
| B-C-09 | 5 | RM421-RM26 | 5.5 | 14.4 | 10.4 | ||
| 6 | RM588-RM217 | 4.1 | 13.6 | 9.5 | |||
| 9 | RM444-RM105 | 4.3 | 13.1 | 10.2 | |||
| RIL | R-A-12 | 1 | RM443-RM128 | 3.6 | 10.8 | 7.9 | |
| 9 | RM1328-RM105 | 4.9 | 11.1 | 7.9 | |||
| R-N-09 | 1 | RM237-RM128 | 4.9 | 11.3 | 9.8 | ||
| 9 | RM1328-RM105 | 6.8 | 13.7 | 10.1 | |||
| R-C-11 | 1 | RM443-RM128 | 4.2 | 9.9 | 8.4 | ||
| 1 | RM237 | 3.1 | 7.3 | 7.4 | |||
| 9 | RM1328-RM105 | 10.2 | 21.5 | 12.0 |
Aging treatments: ‘B’ and ‘R’ indicate BIL and RIL population, respectively. ‘A’, ‘N’, and ‘C’ denote artificial, natural, and combined aging treatment, respectively, ‘09’, ‘10’, ‘11’, and ‘12’ indicate 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively.
QTL name: the letter ‘q’ stands for QTL and ‘SS’ for seed storability; the letter ‘n’ and ‘nj’ for rice cultivar N22 and Nanjing35, respectively; the first number denotes the chromosomal location; the second number denotes different QTL located on the same chromosome.
LOD score: logarithm of odds.
PVE (%): percentage of total phenotypic variance explained by the QTL.
Genotypes and phenotypes of five lines with different numbers of QTLs in Nanjing35/N22//Nanjing35 BILs
| Line name | Genotypes | Germination percentages | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| RM341 | RM525 | RM480 | RM26 | RM588 | RM7038 | RM105 | B-A-10 | B-N-09 | B-C-09 | |
| Nanjing35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 31.6 ± 9.4 | 6.7 ± 1.9 | 0 |
| N22 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 97.8 ± 3.9 | 100 | 77.8 ± 7.7 |
| I-069 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6.7 ± 0.0 | 71.1 ± 8.4 | 1.3 ± 1.5 |
| I-066 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 98.9 ± 1.9 |
| I-079 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 91.0 ± 6.9 | 97.8 ± 3.9 | 62.0 ± 34.1 |
| I-081 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 96.7 ± 5.8 | 97.5 ± 3.5 | 90.0 ± 0.0 |
| I-085 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 86.67 ± 0.0 | 98.9 ± 1.9 | 98.0 ± 2.0 |
‘B’ indicate the BIL population. ‘A’, ‘N’, and ‘C’ denote artificial, natural, and combined aging treatment, respectively, ‘09’ and ‘10’ indicate 2009 and 2010, respectively.
1 denotes genotypes of Nanjing35.
2 denotes genotypes of N22.
Fig. 3Tetrazolium assay and GPs of Nanjing35 and five lines from BILs after stored under disgusting-ventilated conditions (poor ventilation and wide variation of humidity accompanied with seasonal alternation) for 18 months. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. ** mean significant at the 0.01 probability level. (A) represent tetrazolium assay of Nanjing35 and five lines from BILs. (B) represent GPs of Nanjing35 and five lines from BILs.
Fig. 4Response of Nanjing35 and the NIL to artificial aging and natural aging treatments. (A and B) represent germination of Nanjing35 (left) and the NIL (right) without aging treatment and after artificial aging for 20 days at 40°C and 85% RH, respectively. (C and E) represent tetrazolium assay and GPs of Nanjing35 and the NIL after natural aging for 20 months, respectively. (D) represents GPs of Nanjing35 and the NIL after artificial aging for 20 days at 40°C and 85% RH. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. ** mean significant at the 0.01 probability level.