Literature DB >> 26719375

Investigation of Factors Determining the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Subcutaneous Xenografts.

Michiel Bolkestein1, Erik de Blois2, Stuart J Koelewijn2, Alexander M M Eggermont3, Frank Grosveld4, Marion de Jong2, Gerben A Koning5.   

Abstract

Liposomal chemotherapy offers several advantages over conventional therapies, including high intratumoral drug delivery, reduced side effects, prolonged circulation time, and the possibility to dose higher. The efficient delivery of liposomal chemotherapeutics relies, however, on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, which refers to the ability of macromolecules to extravasate leaky tumor vessels and accumulate in the tumor tissue. Using a panel of human xenograft tumors, we evaluated the influence of the EPR effect on liposomal distribution in vivo by injection of pegylated liposomes radiolabeled with (111)In. Liposomal accumulation in tumors and organs was followed over time by SPECT/CT imaging. We observed that fast-growing xenografts, which may be less representative of tumor development in patients, showed higher liposomal accumulation than slow-growing xenografts. Additionally, several other parameters known to influence the EPR effect were evaluated, such as blood and lymphatic vessel density, intratumoral hypoxia, and the presence of infiltrating macrophages. The investigation of various parameters showed a few correlations. Although hypoxia, proliferation, and macrophage presence were associated with tumor growth, no hard conclusions or predictions could be made regarding the EPR effect or liposomal uptake. However, liposomal uptake was significantly correlated with tumor growth, with fast-growing tumors showing a higher uptake, although no biological determinants could be elucidated to explain this correlation.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPR effect; SPECT; liposomes; nanomedicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26719375     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  10 in total

1.  The Distribution Volume of 18F-Albumin as a Potential Biomarker of Antiangiogenic Treatment Efficacy.

Authors:  Jyoti Roy; Frank Kuo; Falguni Basuli; Mark R Williams; Karen Wong; Michael V Green; Jurgen Seidel; Stephen S Adler; Biying Xu; Peter L Choyke; Elaine M Jagoda
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.099

Review 2.  Fluorescence Guidance in Surgical Oncology: Challenges, Opportunities, and Translation.

Authors:  Madeline T Olson; Quan P Ly; Aaron M Mohs
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Acidic pH-targeted chitosan capped mesoporous silica coated gold nanorods facilitate detection of pancreatic tumors via multispectral optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Matthew R Zeiderman; Desiree E Morgan; John D Christein; William E Grizzle; Kelly M McMasters; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-06-06

4.  Biodistribution of intravenous [99mTc]Tc-phytate in mouse models of chemically and foreign-body induced sterile inflammation.

Authors:  Maria Papachristou; Dimitrios Priftakis; Stavros Xanthopoulos; Ioannis Datseris; Penelope Bouziotis
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of macromolecular prodrug GC-FUA based nanoparticle for hepatocellular carcinoma chemotherapy.

Authors:  Can Huang; Na-Mei Li; Pei Gao; Sa Yang; Qian Ning; Wen Huang; Zhi-Ping Li; Peng-Ju Ye; Li Xiang; Dong-Xiu He; Xiang-Wen Tan; Cui-Yun Yu
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.419

Review 6.  Nuclear imaging of liposomal drug delivery systems: A critical review of radiolabelling methods and applications in nanomedicine.

Authors:  Francis Man; Peter J Gawne; Rafael T M de Rosales
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  Polymeric Carriers for Delivery of RNA Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Sofía Mirón-Barroso; Joana S Correia; Adam E Frampton; Mark P Lythgoe; James Clark; Laura Tookman; Silvia Ottaviani; Leandro Castellano; Alexandra E Porter; Theoni K Georgiou; Jonathan Krell
Journal:  Noncoding RNA       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 8.  MRI techniques for immunotherapy monitoring.

Authors:  Doreen Lau; Pippa G Corrie; Ferdia A Gallagher
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 12.469

9.  Design and Evaluation of 223Ra-Labeled and Anti-PSMA Targeted NaA Nanozeolites for Prostate Cancer Therapy-Part II. Toxicity, Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution.

Authors:  Anna Lankoff; Malwina Czerwińska; Rafał Walczak; Urszula Karczmarczyk; Kamil Tomczyk; Kamil Brzóska; Giulio Fracasso; Piotr Garnuszek; Renata Mikołajczak; Marcin Kruszewski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Development of a bone-targeted pH-sensitive liposomal formulation containing doxorubicin: physicochemical characterization, cytotoxicity, and biodistribution evaluation in a mouse model of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Diêgo Dos Santos Ferreira; Samilla Dornelas Faria; Sávia Caldeira de Araújo Lopes; Cláudia Salviano Teixeira; Angelo Malachias; Rogério Magalhães-Paniago; José Dias de Souza Filho; Bruno Luis de Jesus Pinto Oliveira; Alexander Ramos Guimarães; Peter Caravan; Lucas Antônio Miranda Ferreira; Ricardo José Alves; Mônica Cristina Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-08-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.