Literature DB >> 26719136

Improving the Glucose Meter Error Grid With the Taguchi Loss Function.

Jan S Krouwer1.   

Abstract

Glucose meters often have similar performance when compared by error grid analysis. This is one reason that other statistics such as mean absolute relative deviation (MARD) are used to further differentiate performance. The problem with MARD is that too much information is lost. But additional information is available within the A zone of an error grid by using the Taguchi loss function. Applying the Taguchi loss function gives each glucose meter difference from reference a value ranging from 0 (no error) to 1 (error reaches the A zone limit). Values are averaged over all data which provides an indication of risk of an incorrect medical decision. This allows one to differentiate glucose meter performance for the common case where meters have a high percentage of values in the A zone and no values beyond the B zone. Examples are provided using simulated data.
© 2015 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MARD; Parkes error grid; Taguchi loss function; surveillance error grid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26719136      PMCID: PMC4928212          DOI: 10.1177/1932296815624713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  6 in total

1.  Wrong thinking about glucose standards.

Authors:  Jan S Krouwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Technical aspects of the Parkes error grid.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; David C Klonoff; Scott Pardo; Joan L Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

3.  Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.

Authors:  Solveig Halldorsdottir; Mary Ellen Warchal-Windham; Jane F Wallace; Scott Pardo; Joan Lee Parkes; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

4.  The surveillance error grid.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Courtney Lias; Robert Vigersky; William Clarke; Joan Lee Parkes; David B Sacks; M Sue Kirkman; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

5.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.

Authors:  Karin Obermaier; Günther Schmelzeisen-Redeker; Michael Schoemaker; Hans-Martin Klötzer; Harald Kirchsteiger; Heino Eikmeier; Luigi del Re
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.