Literature DB >> 26718314

Using chromosomal data in the phylogenetic and molecular dating framework: karyotype evolution and diversification in Nierembergia (Solanaceae) influenced by historical changes in sea level.

M C Acosta1, E A Moscone1, A A Cocucci1.   

Abstract

Karyotype data within a phylogenetic framework and molecular dating were used to examine chromosome evolution in Nierembergia and to infer how geological or climatic processes have influenced in the diversification of this solanaceous genus native to South America and Mexico. Despite the numerous studies comparing karyotype features across species, including the use of molecular phylogenies, to date relatively few studies have used formal comparative methods to elucidate chromosomal evolution, especially to reconstruct the whole ancestral karyotypes. Here, we mapped on the Nierembergia phylogeny one complete set of chromosomal data obtained by conventional staining, AgNOR-, C- and fluorescent chromosome banding, and fluorescent in situ hybridisation. In addition, we used a Bayesian molecular relaxed clock to estimate divergence times between species. Nierembergia showed two major divergent clades: a mountainous species group with symmetrical karyotypes, large chromosomes, only one nucleolar organising region (NOR) and without centromeric heterochromatin, and a lowland species group with asymmetrical karyotypes, small chromosomes, two chromosomes pairs with NORs and centromeric heterochromatin bands. Molecular dating on the DNA phylogeny revealed that both groups diverged during Late Miocene, when Atlantic marine ingressions, called the 'Paranense Sea', probably forced the ancestors of these species to find refuge in unflooded areas for about 2 Myr. This split agrees with an increased asymmetry and heterochromatin amount, and decrease in karyotype length and chromosome size. Thus, when the two Nierembergia ancestral lineages were isolated, major divergences occurred in chromosomal evolution, and then each lineage underwent speciation separately, with relatively minor changes in chromosomal characteristics.
© 2016 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosome banding; chromosome evolution; fluorescent in situ hybridisation; karyotype ancestral reconstruction; molecular dating

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26718314     DOI: 10.1111/plb.12430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)        ISSN: 1435-8603            Impact factor:   3.081


  5 in total

1.  Cytogenetic evidences on the evolutionary relationships between the tetraploids of the section Rhizomatosae and related diploid species (Arachis, Leguminosae).

Authors:  Alejandra Marcela Ortiz; Germán Robledo; Guillermo Seijo; José Francisco Montenegro Valls; Graciela Inés Lavia
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Evolutionary convergence or homology? Comparative cytogenomics of Caesalpinia group species (Leguminosae) reveals diversification in the pericentromeric heterochromatic composition.

Authors:  Brena Van-Lume; Yennifer Mata-Sucre; Mariana Báez; Tiago Ribeiro; Bruno Huettel; Edeline Gagnon; Ilia J Leitch; Andrea Pedrosa-Harand; Gwilym P Lewis; Gustavo Souza
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Heterochromatin and numeric chromosome evolution in Bignoniaceae, with emphasis on the Neotropical clade Tabebuia alliance.

Authors:  Joel M P Cordeiro; Miriam Kaehler; Luiz Gustavo Souza; Leonardo P Felix
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 4.  Chromosome Evolution in the Family Solanaceae.

Authors:  Rocío Deanna; María Cristina Acosta; Marisel Scaldaferro; Franco Chiarini
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  New chromosome number and cyto-molecular characterization of the African Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) - "The Tree of Life".

Authors:  Nurul Islam-Faridi; Hamidou F Sakhanokho; C Dana Nelson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.