Vivian Lewis1, Camille A Martina, Michael P McDermott, Paula M Trief, Steven R Goodman, Gene D Morse, Jennifer G LaGuardia, Daryl Sharp, Richard M Ryan. 1. V. Lewis is professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and vice provost for faculty development and diversity, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. C.A. Martina is research assistant professor, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. M.P. McDermott is professor, Departments of Biostatistics and Computational Biology and Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. P.M. Trief is professor, Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Medicine, and senior associate dean for faculty affairs and faculty development, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York. S.R. Goodman is professor, Department of Pediatrics and Physiology, and vice chancellor for research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis Tennessee. G.D. Morse is SUNY distinguished professor of pharmacy practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. J.G. LaGuardia is affiliated with the Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California. D. Sharp is professor of clinical nursing, University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, New York. R.M. Ryan is professor, Department of Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of different mentoring interventions on the basic psychological need satisfaction of underrepresented minorities and women in academia. METHOD:Participants were 150 mentor/protégé dyads from three academic medical centers and eight other colleges and universities in western and central New York, randomized from 2010 to 2013 intomentor training (using principles of self-determination theory); peer mentoring for protégés; mentor training and peer mentoring for protégés combined; or control/usual practice. Protégé participants were graduate students, fellows, and junior faculty who were from underrepresented groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, or disability.The primary analysis was a comparison of intervention effects on changes in protégés' satisfaction of their basic psychological needs (competence, autonomy, and relatedness) with their mentor. They completed a well-validated, online questionnaire every two months for one year. RESULTS: There was no significant effect at the end of one year of either mentor training or peer mentoring on protégés' psychological basic need satisfaction with mentor specifically or at work in general. Exploratory analyses showed a significant effect of the mentor-based intervention on the protégés' overall psychological need satisfaction with their mentor at two months, the time point closest to completing mentor training. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial showed a potential short-term effect of mentor training on changing basic psychological need satisfaction of underrepresented scholars with their mentors. Despite the lack of sustained effect of either mentor training or peer mentoring, these short-term changes suggest feasibility and potential for future study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of different mentoring interventions on the basic psychological need satisfaction of underrepresented minorities and women in academia. METHOD:Participants were 150 mentor/protégé dyads from three academic medical centers and eight other colleges and universities in western and central New York, randomized from 2010 to 2013 into mentor training (using principles of self-determination theory); peer mentoring for protégés; mentor training and peer mentoring for protégés combined; or control/usual practice. Protégé participants were graduate students, fellows, and junior faculty who were from underrepresented groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, or disability.The primary analysis was a comparison of intervention effects on changes in protégés' satisfaction of their basic psychological needs (competence, autonomy, and relatedness) with their mentor. They completed a well-validated, online questionnaire every two months for one year. RESULTS: There was no significant effect at the end of one year of either mentor training or peer mentoring on protégés' psychological basic need satisfaction with mentor specifically or at work in general. Exploratory analyses showed a significant effect of the mentor-based intervention on the protégés' overall psychological need satisfaction with their mentor at two months, the time point closest to completing mentor training. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial showed a potential short-term effect of mentor training on changing basic psychological need satisfaction of underrepresented scholars with their mentors. Despite the lack of sustained effect of either mentor training or peer mentoring, these short-term changes suggest feasibility and potential for future study.
Authors: Jada Bussey-Jones; Lisa Bernstein; Stacy Higgins; David Malebranche; Anuradha Paranjape; Inginia Genao; Bennett Lee; William Branch Journal: Acad Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Molly Carnes; Patricia G Devine; Linda Baier Manwell; Angela Byars-Winston; Eve Fine; Cecilia E Ford; Patrick Forscher; Carol Isaac; Anna Kaatz; Wairimu Magua; Mari Palta; Jennifer Sheridan Journal: Acad Med Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Bettina M Beech; Jorge Calles-Escandon; Kristen G Hairston; Sarah E Langdon; Brenda A Latham-Sadler; Ronny A Bell Journal: Acad Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Dawn L Comeau; Kathryn Mishkin; Nestani Tukvadze; Zaza Avaliani; Russell R Kempker; Lisa Sthreshley; Matthew J Magee; Hannah Eisen; Damen Haile Mariam; Abraham Aseffa; Henry M Blumberg Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Vivian Lewis; Camille A Martina; Michael P McDermott; Linda Chaudron; Paula M Trief; Jennifer G LaGuardia; Daryl Sharp; Steven R Goodman; Gene D Morse; Richard M Ryan Journal: CBE Life Sci Educ Date: 2017 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Fred M Ssewamala; Julia Shu-Huah Wang; Rachel Brathwaite; Sicong Sun; Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson; Torsten B Neilands; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Matthew A Lynn; Elizabeth Butcher; Jessica A Cuculick; Steven Barnett; Camille A Martina; Scott R Smith; Robert Q Pollard; Patricia J Simpson-Haidaris Journal: Mentor Tutoring Date: 2020-04-13
Authors: Folakemi T Odedina; R R Reams; E Kaninjing; J Nguyen; B Mochona; D E Lyon; N Askins; L S Behar-Horenstein Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.771
Authors: Anne Marie Weber-Main; Janet Shanedling; Alexander M Kaizer; John Connett; Michelle Lamere; Esam E El-Fakahany Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2019-07-18
Authors: Folakemi T Odedina; Linda S Behar-Horenstein; Parisa Fathi; Ernest Kaninjing; Jennifer Nguyen; Nissa Askins; R Renee Reams; Bereket Mochona; Adaora Ezeani; Debra Lyon; Kayanna Jacobs; Michael Maduka Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 1.771