Literature DB >> 26717175

Status of NCRP Scientific Committee 1-23 Commentary on Guidance on Radiation Dose Limits for the Lens of the Eye.

Lawrence T Dauer1, Elizabeth A Ainsbury, Joseph Dynlacht, David Hoel, Barbara E K Klein, Don Mayer, Christina R Prescott, Raymond H Thornton, Eliseo Vano, Gayle E Woloschak, Cynthia M Flannery, Lee E Goldstein, Nobuyuki Hamada, Phung K Tran, Michael P Grissom, Eleanor A Blakely.   

Abstract

Previous National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) publications have addressed the issues of risk and dose limitation in radiation protection and included guidance on specific organs and the lens of the eye. NCRP decided to prepare an updated commentary intended to enhance the previous recommendations provided in earlier reports. The NCRP Scientific Committee 1-23 (SC 1-23) is charged with preparing a commentary that will evaluate recent studies on the radiation dose response for the development of cataracts and also consider the type and severity of the cataracts as well as the dose rate; provide guidance on whether existing dose limits to the lens of the eye should be changed in the United States; and suggest research needs regarding radiation effects on and dose limits to the lens of the eye. A status of the ongoing work of SC 1-23 was presented at the Annual Meeting, "Changing Regulations and Radiation Guidance: What Does the Future Hold?" The following represents a synopsis of a few main points in the current draft commentary. It is likely that several changes will be forthcoming as SC 1-23 responds to subject matter expert review and develops a final document, expected by mid 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26717175      PMCID: PMC4697269          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  6 in total

1.  Radiation cataractogenesis: epidemiology and biology.

Authors:  E A Blakely; N J Kleiman; K Neriishi; G Chodick; L T Chylack; F A Cucinotta; A Minamoto; E Nakashima; T Kumagami; T Kitaoka; T Kanamoto; Y Kiuchi; P Chang; N Fujii; R E Shore
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Radiation-induced cataracts: the Health Protection Agency's response to the ICRP statement on tissue reactions and recommendation on the dose limit for the eye lens.

Authors:  Simon Bouffler; Elizabeth Ainsbury; Phil Gilvin; John Harrison
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 1.394

Review 3.  ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context.

Authors:  F A Stewart; A V Akleyev; M Hauer-Jensen; J H Hendry; N J Kleiman; T J Macvittie; B M Aleman; A B Edgar; K Mabuchi; C R Muirhead; R E Shore; W H Wallace
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2012-02

4.  Report of Task Group on the implications of the implementation of the ICRP recommendations for a revised dose limit to the lens of the eye.

Authors:  J Broughton; M C Cantone; M Ginjaume; B Shah
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.394

5.  Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture on radiation protection and measurements: what makes particle radiation so effective?

Authors:  Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 6.  Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies.

Authors:  E A Ainsbury; S D Bouffler; W Dörr; J Graw; C R Muirhead; A A Edwards; J Cooper
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.841

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  NCRP Program Area Committee 1: Basic Criteria, Epidemiology, Radiobiology and Risk.

Authors:  Kathryn D Held; Gayle E Woloschak
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Radiobiology in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Pat Zanzonico; Lawrence Dauer; H William Strauss
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Biological basis of radiation protection needs rejuvenation.

Authors:  Tatjana Paunesku; Benjamin Haley; Antone Brooks; Gayle E Woloschak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.