Literature DB >> 26717109

Cytochrome C in Patients with Septic Shock.

Lars W Andersen1, Xiaowen Liu, Sophia Montissol, Mathias J Holmberg, Christopher Sulmonte, Julia L Balkema, Michael N Cocchi, Raúl J Gazmuri, Kathrine M Berg, Maureen Chase, Michael W Donnino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cytochrome c is an essential component of the electron transport chain, and circulating cytochrome c might be an indicator of mitochondrial injury. The objective of this study was to determine whether cytochrome c levels are elevated in septic patients, whether there is an association between cytochrome c levels and lactate/inflammatory markers, and whether elevated levels of cytochrome c are associated with poor outcomes.
METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, observational, pilot study within a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. We enrolled adult patients in septic shock and with an elevated lactate (>3 mmol/L). Blood was collected at enrollment and at 12 and 24  h thereafter. Cytochrome c was measured in plasma using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.
RESULTS: We included 77 patients. Plasma cytochrome c levels were significantly higher in septic patients than in healthy controls (0.70  ng/mL [quartiles: 0.06, 1.99] vs. 0.19  ng/mL [quartiles: 0.03, 1.32], P = 0.008). Cytochrome c levels at enrollment were positively correlated with lactate levels (r(s) = 0.40, P < 0.001) but not with inflammatory markers. Patients who died before hospital discharge had significantly higher cytochrome c levels than survivors (0.99  ng/mL [quartiles: 0.36, 4.09] vs. 0.58  ng/mL [quartiles: 0.03, 1.64], P = 0.01). When analyzed over time, the difference between survivors and nonsurvivors remained significant (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cytochrome c levels are higher in septic patients than in controls. In unadjusted analysis, septic nonsurvivors had higher cytochrome c levels than survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26717109     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  2 in total

1.  What's New in Shock, May 2016?

Authors:  Monowar Aziz; Ping Wang
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Evaluation of a combination "lymphocyte apoptosis model" to predict survival of sepsis patients in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Wenqiang Jiang; Wenhong Zhong; Yiyu Deng; Chunbo Chen; Qiaosheng Wang; Maohua Zhou; Xusheng Li; Cheng Sun; Hongke Zeng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.