Literature DB >> 26717031

Will Neuroimaging Reveal a Severe Intracranial Injury in This Adult With Minor Head Trauma?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.

Joshua S Easter1, Jason S Haukoos2, William P Meehan3, Victor Novack4, Jonathan A Edlow5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Adults with apparently minor head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] scores ≥13 who appear well on examination) may have severe intracranial injuries requiring prompt intervention. Findings from clinical examination can aid in determining which adults with minor trauma have severe intracranial injuries visible on computed tomography (CT).
OBJECTIVE: To assess systematically the accuracy of symptoms and signs in adults with minor head trauma in order to identify those with severe intracranial injuries. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE (1966-2015) and the Cochrane Library to identify studies assessing the diagnosis of intracranial injuries. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included that measured the performance of findings for identifying intracranial injury with a reference standard of neuroimaging or follow-up evaluation. Fourteen studies (range, 431-7955 patients) met inclusion criteria with patients having GCS scores between 13 and 15 and 50% or more older than 18 years. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three authors independently performed critical appraisal and data extraction.
RESULTS: The prevalence of severe intracranial injury (requiring prompt intervention) among the 23,079 patients with minor head trauma was 7.1% (95% CI, 6.8%-7.4%) and the prevalence of injuries leading to death or requiring neurosurgical intervention was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.78%-1.0%). The presence of physical examination findings suggestive of skull fracture (likelihood ratio [LR], 16; 95% CI, 3.1-59; specificity, 99%), GCS score of 13 (LR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.8-8.5; specificity, 97%), 2 or more vomiting episodes (LR, 3.6; 95% CI, 3.1-4.1; specificity, 92%), any decline in GCS score (LR range, 3.4-16; specificity range, 91%-99%;), and pedestrians struck by motor vehicles (LR range, 3.0-4.3; specificity range, 96%-97%) were associated with severe intracranial injury on CT. Among patients with apparent minor head trauma, the absence of any of the features of the Canadian CT Head Rule (≥65 years; ≥2 vomiting episodes, amnesia >30 minutes, pedestrian struck, ejected from vehicle, fall >1 m, suspected skull fracture, or GCS score <15 at 2 hours) had an LR of 0.04 (95% CI, 0-0.65), lowering the probability of severe injury to 0.31% (95% CI, 0%-4.7%). The absence of all the New Orleans Criteria findings (>60 years, intoxication, headache, vomiting, amnesia, seizure, or trauma above the clavicle) had an LR of 0.08 (95% CI, 0.01-0.84), lowering the probability of severe intracranial injury to 0.61% (95% CI, 0.08%-6.0%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Combinations of history and physical examination features in clinical decision rules can identify patients with minor head trauma at low risk of severe intracranial injuries. Certain findings, including signs of skull fracture, GCS score of 13, 2 or more vomiting episodes, decrease in GCS score, and pedestrians struck by motor vehicles, may help identify patients at increased risk of severe intracranial injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26717031     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.16316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  16 in total

Review 1.  Fluid biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury and related conditions.

Authors:  Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  [Focus on neurosurgery : Intensive care studies from 2018-2019].

Authors:  C Beynon; M Bernhard; T Brenner; M Dietrich; C Nusshag; M A Weigand; C J Reuß; D Michalski; C Jungk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Concussion Care Practices and Utilization of Evidence-Based Guidelines in the Evaluation and Management of Concussion: A Survey of New England Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Robert A Stern; Daniel Seichepine; Christine Tschoe; Nathan G Fritts; Michael L Alosco; Oren Berkowitz; Peter Burke; Jonathan Howland; Jonathan Olshaker; Robert C Cantu; Christine M Baugh; James W Holsapple
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Aggression, Impulsivity, and History of Other- and Self-Directed Aggression.

Authors:  Caterina Mosti; Emil F Coccaro
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.198

Review 5.  Emergency department management of traumatic brain injuries: A resource tiered review.

Authors:  Julia Dixon; Grant Comstock; Jennifer Whitfield; David Richards; Taylor W Burkholder; Noel Leifer; Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman; Emilie J Calvello Hynes
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  The Applicability of New Orleans Criteria for Head Computed Tomography in Inpatient Falls With Injury.

Authors:  Jay Yarlagadda; Shikha Joshi; Matthew T Cerasale; Sanah Rana; Danielle Heidemann
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2019-03-26

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Biomarker Screening for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  YouRong Sophie Su; James M Schuster; Douglas H Smith; Sherman C Stein
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.869

8.  Discrepancy between the initial assessment of injury severity and post hoc determination of injury severity in patients with apparently mild traumatic brain injury: a retrospective multicenter cohort analysis.

Authors:  S M Bossers; K M Pol; E P A Oude Ophuis; B Jacobs; M C Visser; S A Loer; C Boer; J van der Naalt; P Schober
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  External validation of computed tomography decision rules for minor head injury: prospective, multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Kelly A Foks; Crispijn L van den Brand; Hester F Lingsma; Joukje van der Naalt; Bram Jacobs; Eline de Jong; Hugo F den Boogert; Özcan Sir; Peter Patka; Suzanne Polinder; Menno I Gaakeer; Charlotte E Schutte; Kim E Jie; Huib F Visee; Myriam G M Hunink; Eef Reijners; Meriam Braaksma; Guus G Schoonman; Ewout W Steyerberg; Korné Jellema; Diederik W J Dippel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-08-24

10.  Accuracy of a rapid glial fibrillary acidic protein/ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 test for the prediction of intracranial injuries on head computed tomography after mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bazarian; Robert D Welch; Krista Caudle; Craig A Jeffrey; James Y Chen; Raj Chandran; Tamara McCaw; Saul A Datwyler; Hongwei Zhang; Beth McQuiston
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 5.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.