Literature DB >> 26716568

The role of positive and negative pressure on cavitation nucleation in nanodroplet-mediated histotripsy.

Eli Vlaisavljevich1, Omer Aydin, Kuang-Wei Lin, Yasemin Yuksel Durmaz, Brian Fowlkes, Mohamed ElSayed, Zhen Xu.   

Abstract

Nanodroplet-mediated histotripsy (NMH) is an ultrasound ablation technique combining histotripsy with acoustically sensitive perfluorocarbon (PFC) nanodroplets that can be selectively delivered to tumor cells for targeted tumor ablation. NMH takes advantage of the significantly reduced cavitation threshold of the nanodroplets, allowing for cavitation to be selectively generated only in regions containing nanodroplets. Understanding the physical mechanisms underlying the nanodroplet cavitation process is essential to the development of NMH. In this study, we hypothesize that cavitation nucleation is caused by the negative pressure (p-) exposed to the PFC, and the NMH cavitation threshold is therefore determined by the incident p-  of the single-cycle pulses commonly used in NMH. This paper reports the first study that separately investigates the effects of negative and positive pressure on the NMH cavitation threshold using near half-cycle ultrasound pulses with dominant negative (negative-polarity pulses) or positive (positive-polarity pulses) pressure phases. Tissue phantoms containing perfluorohexane (PFH) nanodroplets were exposed to negative-polarity and positive-polarity pulses generated by a frequency compounding transducer recently developed in our lab, and the probability of generating cavitation was measured as a function of peak negative (p-) and peak positive (p+) pressure. The results showed close agreement in the p- cavitation threshold for PFH phantoms exposed to negative-polarity (11.4 ± 0.1 MPa) and positive-polarity (11.7 ± 0.2 MPa) pulses. The p+ at the cavitation threshold, in contrast, was measured to be sign ficantly different for the negative-polarity (4.0 ± 0.1 MPa) and positive-polarity (42.6 ± 0.2 MPa) pulses. In the final part of this study, the experimental results were compared to the cavitation threshold predicted by classical nucleation theory (CNT), with results showing close agreement between simulations and experiments. Overall, the results support our hypothesis and provide significant insight into the physical mechanisms underlying NMH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26716568     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

Review 1.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Effects of f-number on the histotripsy intrinsic threshold and cavitation bubble cloud behavior.

Authors:  Eli Vlaisavljevich; Tyler Gerhardson; Tim Hall; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Effects of Temperature on the Histotripsy Intrinsic Threshold for Cavitation.

Authors:  Eli Vlaisavljevich; Zhen Xu; Adam Maxwell; Lauren Mancia; Xi Zhang; Kuang-Wei Lin; Alexander Duryea; Jonathan Sukovich; Tim Hall; Eric Johnsen; Charles Cain
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Soft-Tissue Aberration Correction for Histotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan J Macoskey; Timothy L Hall; Jonathan R Sukovich; Sang Won Choi; Kimberly Ives; Eric Johnsen; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Bubble Cloud Behavior and Ablation Capacity for Histotripsy Generated from Intrinsic or Artificial Cavitation Nuclei.

Authors:  Connor Edsall; Zerin Mahzabin Khan; Lauren Mancia; Sarah Hall; Waleed Mustafa; Eric Johnsen; Alexander L Klibanov; Yasemin Yuksel Durmaz; Eli Vlaisavljevich
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Review on Acoustic Droplet Vaporization in Ultrasound Diagnostics and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ksenia Loskutova; Dmitry Grishenkov; Morteza Ghorbani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Triple-combination therapy assisted with ultrasound-active gold nanoparticles and ultrasound therapy against 3D cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Bilgi Kip; Cansu Umran Tunc; Omer Aydin
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 7.491

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.