| Literature DB >> 26716117 |
Joao Paulo Ribeiro1, Sérgio Eiji Matuguma1, Spencer Cheng1, Paulo Herman1, Paulo Sakai2, Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque2, Fauze Maluf-Filho2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The results of endoscopic treatment with elastic band ligation for esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis remain poor. In comparison with treatment with elastic band ligation, we have found lower rates of rebleeding and mortality with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injections. Thus, the aim of the current study was to describe our unit's 10 years of experience with injection of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate to control esophageal variceal ruptures in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Sixty-three patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis had been admitted to the center with an acute episode of esophageal variceal bleeding. All were treated with injection of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. The patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to their Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis scores: group I (score range, 10 through 13 points) and group II (score, 14 or 15 points). The 3 variables studied were rates of initial failure to control bleeding, failure to prevent rebleeding (secondary prophylaxis), and mortality. Patients in the 2 groups (group I, n = 50; group II, n = 13) had similar characteristics.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26716117 PMCID: PMC4683151 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endosc Int Open ISSN: 2196-9736
Characteristics and history of patients (N = 63) selected for study.
| No. (%) | Group I, % | Group II, % | ||
| Age, y Range Mean (SD) | 22 – 7449.9 (13) | 63 (100) | ||
| Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis score | ||||
| Group I (10, 11, 12, or 13 points) | 50 (79.4) | |||
| Group II (14 or 15 points) | 13 (20.6) | |||
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 13 (20.6) | 69.2 | 30.8 | |
| Male | 50 (79.4) | 82.0 | 18.0 | |
| Cause of cirrhosis | ||||
| Alcohol | 10 (15.9) | 100 | 0 | |
| Alcohol and virus | 7 (11.1) | 100 | 0 | |
| Cryptogenic | 9 (14.3) | 66.67 | 33.33 | |
| Virus | 28 (44.4) | 78.57 | 21.43 | |
| Other | 9 (14.3) | 55.56 | 44.44 | |
| History of variceal bleeding during the past year | ||||
| No | 15 (23.8) | 73.3 | 26.7 | |
| Yes | 48 (76.2) | 81.3 | 18.7 | |
| Type of hemorrhage | ||||
| Primary | 50 (79.4) | 88.0 | 12.0 | |
| Secondary | 13 (20.6) | 46.2 | 53.8 | |
| Use of Sengstaken-Blakemore tube for esophageal balloon tamponade before index endoscopy | ||||
| No | 56 (88.9) | 76.8 | 23.2 | |
| Yes | 7 (11.1) | 100 | 0 | |
| Endoscopic findings of variceal bleeding | ||||
| Active | 23 (36.5) | 82.6 | 17.4 | |
| Recent | 40 (63.5) | 77.5 | 22.5 | |
| Ampules of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate used during treatment, no. | ||||
| 1 | 50 (79.4) | 80.0 | 20.0 | |
| ≥ 2 | 13 (20.6) | 76.9 | 23.1 |
SD, standard deviation.
Hemorrhage type was classified as primary for patients seeking treatment because of bleeding.
Hemorrhage type was classified as secondary for patients who presented with gastrointestinal bleeding during hospitalization for other causes.
Results of endoscopic treatment with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis.
| No. (%) | Group I, no. (%) | Group II, no. (%) |
| |
| Failure to control bleeding | 16 | 11 | 5 (38.5) | .20 |
| Failure of secondary prophylaxis | 13 (27.0) | 7 (17.5) | 6 (75.0) | < 0.001 |
| Global mortality | 28 (44.4) | 17 (34.0) | 11 (84.6) | .001 |
One patient in whom bleeding failed to be controlled survived the bleeding episode.
Data refer to 7 cases (17.5 %) of failure of secondary prophylaxis from 40 patients who were alive to be submitted to secondary prophylaxis.
Data refer to 6 cases (75.0 %) of failure of secondary prophylaxis from 8 patients who were alive to be submitted to secondary prophylaxis.
Fig. 1Overall survival curves (N = 63): group I (GI) versus group II (G2).
Prognostic factors related to the rate of failure to control bleeding: Cox regression analysis with multiple variables.
| Hazard ratio | 95 % CI |
| ||
| Previous bleeding: yes vs no | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.58 | .002 |
| N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate: ≥ 2 ampules vs 1 ampule | 3.74 | 1.34 | 10.41 | .012 |
CI, confidence interval.
Prognostic factors for failure of secondary prophylaxis: simple Cox regression analysis.
| Hazard ratio | 95 % CI |
| ||
| Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis scores: group II vs group I | 6.59 | 2.2 | 19.77 | .001 |
| Hemorrhage type: secondary vs primary | 2.08 | 0.57 | 7.57 | .266 |
| Previous bleeding: yes vs no | 0.63 | 0.17 | 2.3 | .484 |
| Esophageal balloon tamponade: yes vs no | 0.72 | 0.09 | 5.56 | .755 |
| Endoscopic findings of variceal bleeding: recent vs active bleeding | 0.47 | 0.16 | 1.4 | .174 |
| N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate: ≥ 2 ampules vs 1 ampule | 3.14 | 0.96 | 10.24 | .058 |
| Cirrhosis cause: | ||||
| Cryptogenic vs alcohol and virus | 1.02 | 0.17 | 6.1 | .984 |
| Virus vs alcohol and virus | 1.24 | 0.17 | 8.85 | .827 |
| Other vs alcohol and virus | 1.01 | 0.2 | 5.02 | .989 |
CI, confidence interval.Only the 48 patients who had survived at least 5 days after the initial treatment were considered in evaluation of prognostic factors for failure of secondary prophylaxis.