Literature DB >> 26716090

Diagnosing, planning and evaluating osteochondral ankle defects with imaging modalities.

Christiaan Ja van Bergen1, Rogier M Gerards1, Kim Tm Opdam1, Maaike P Terra1, Gino Mmj Kerkhoffs1.   

Abstract

This current concepts review outlines the role of different imaging modalities in the diagnosis, preoperative planning, and follow-up of osteochondral ankle defects. An osteochondral ankle defect involves the articular cartilage and subchondral bone (usually of the talus) and is mostly caused by an ankle supination trauma. Conventional radiographs are useful as an initial imaging tool in the diagnostic process, but have only moderate sensitivity for the detection of osteochondral defects. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more accurate imaging modalities. Recently, ultrasonography and single photon emission CT have been described for the evaluation of osteochondral talar defects. CT is the most valuable modality for assessing the exact location and size of bony lesions. Cartilage and subchondral bone damage can be visualized using MRI, but the defect size tends to be overestimated due to bone edema. CT with the ankle in full plantar flexion has been shown a reliable tool for preoperative planning of the surgical approach. Postoperative imaging is useful for objective assessment of repair tissue or degenerative changes of the ankle joint. Plain radiography, CT and MRI have been used in outcome studies, and different scoring systems are available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Cartilage; Computed tomography; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Outcome assessment; Radiography; Subchondral bone; Talus

Year:  2015        PMID: 26716090      PMCID: PMC4686441          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  58 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Arthroscopic validation of radiographic grading scales of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Donna Blankenbaker; Paul Stanton; Jason Fine; Arthur De Smet
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Comparison of MRI and arthroscopy in modified MOCART scoring system after autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus.

Authors:  Kyung Tai Lee; Yun Sun Choi; Young Koo Lee; Seung Do Cha; Hyung Mo Koo
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 4.  Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle.

Authors:  Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Benton E Heyworth; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Feasibility of ultrasound imaging of osteochondral defects in the ankle: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  A C Kok; M P Terra; S Muller; C Askeland; C N van Dijk; G M M J Kerkhoffs; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography.

Authors:  M R Schmid; C W A Pfirrmann; J Hodler; P Vienne; M Zanetti
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Radiographic predictability of cartilage damage in medial ankle osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jeong-Seok Moon; Jae-Chan Shim; Jin-Soo Suh; Woo-Chun Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  The basic science of the subchondral bone.

Authors:  Henning Madry; C Niek van Dijk; Magdalena Mueller-Gerbl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients.

Authors:  Y Takakura; Y Tanaka; T Kumai; S Tamai
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-01

Review 10.  Cartilage repair surgery: outcome evaluation by using noninvasive cartilage biomarkers based on quantitative MRI techniques?

Authors:  Pia M Jungmann; Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Benjamin Erdle; Thomas M Link; Xiaojuan Li; Siegfried Trattnig; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler; Goetz H Welsch
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of arthroscopic debridement in osseous versus soft tissue anterior ankle impingement.

Authors:  Ashish Devgan; Rajesh Rohilla; Milind Tanwar; Aditya Jain; Karan Siwach; Radika Devgan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 2.  Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: an up-to-date approach to multimodality imaging and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Júlio Brandão Guimarães; Isabela Azevedo Nicodemos da Cruz; Caio Nery; Flávio Duarte Silva; Alípio Gomes Ormond Filho; Bruno Cerretti Carneiro; Marcelo Astolfi Caetano Nico
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Cristian Indino; Camilla Maccario; Luigi Manzi; Federico Giuseppe Usuelli
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Review on Talus Osteochondral Injuries, Including Osteochondritis Dissecans.

Authors:  Juergen Bruns; Christian Habermann; Mathias Werner
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Accuracy of MRI-Based Talar Cartilage Thickness Measurement and Talus Bone and Cartilage Modeling: Comparison with Ground-Truth Laser Scan Measurements.

Authors:  Carly A Lockard; Ingrid K Stake; Alex W Brady; Madeleine G DeClercq; Kira K Tanghe; Brenton W Douglass; Erik Nott; Charles P Ho; Thomas O Clanton
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  In-Vitro Detection of Small Isolated Cartilage Defects: Intravascular Ultrasound Vs. Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  T Horeman; E C Buiter; B Pouran; M Stijntjes; J Dankelman; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Postoperative Complications and Reoperation Rates Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fracture.

Authors:  Armando Macera; Christian Carulli; Luigi Sirleo; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2018-05-21

8.  Incidence of concomitant chondral/osteochondral lesions in acute ankle fractures and their effect on clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Darwich; Julia Adam; Franz-Joseph Dally; Svetlana Hetjens; Ahmed Jawhar
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  All-arthroscopic AMIC® (AT-AMIC®) technique with autologous bone graft for talar osteochondral defects: clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Federico Giuseppe Usuelli; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Camilla Maccario; Michele Boga; Laura de Girolamo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Three-Dimensional Registration of Freehand-Tracked Ultrasound to CT Images of the Talocrural Joint.

Authors:  Nazlı Tümer; Aimee C Kok; Frans M Vos; Geert J Streekstra; Christian Askeland; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.