A G Robinson1, K Young2, K Balchin3, T Owen1, A Ashworth1. 1. Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON; ; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario-Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON. 2. Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON; 3. Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario-Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Stage iii lung cancer is the most advanced stage of lung cancer for which the potential of curative treatment is often discussed. However, a large proportion of patients are treated with palliative intent. An understanding of the time-dependent and -independent factors contributing to the choice of palliative-intent treatment is needed to help optimize patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of patients with stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) newly diagnosed between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario collected data including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 237 patients with stage iii nsclc included in the study, 130 were not treated with radical or curative intent (55%). Major time-independent variables cited for palliative-intent treatment included extreme age (5%), comorbidity (27%), patient choice (5%), and poor lung function (5%). Time-dependent variables included tumour progression on imaging (15%), weight loss (33%), performance status (32%), and the occurrence of a major complication such as hemoptysis, lung collapse, or pulmonary embolism (7%). A significant number of patients (20%) experienced a decline in performance status-to 2, 3, or 4 from 0 or 1-over the course of the diagnostic journey, and 12% experienced a transition from no weight loss to more than 10% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients receive palliative therapy for stage iii nsclc because of changes that occur during the diagnostic journey. Shortening or altering that pathway to avoid tumour growth or patient deterioration during care could allow for more patients to be treated with curative intent.
INTRODUCTION: Stage iii lung cancer is the most advanced stage of lung cancer for which the potential of curative treatment is often discussed. However, a large proportion of patients are treated with palliative intent. An understanding of the time-dependent and -independent factors contributing to the choice of palliative-intent treatment is needed to help optimize patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of patients with stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) newly diagnosed between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario collected data including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 237 patients with stage iii nsclc included in the study, 130 were not treated with radical or curative intent (55%). Major time-independent variables cited for palliative-intent treatment included extreme age (5%), comorbidity (27%), patient choice (5%), and poor lung function (5%). Time-dependent variables included tumour progression on imaging (15%), weight loss (33%), performance status (32%), and the occurrence of a major complication such as hemoptysis, lung collapse, or pulmonary embolism (7%). A significant number of patients (20%) experienced a decline in performance status-to 2, 3, or 4 from 0 or 1-over the course of the diagnostic journey, and 12% experienced a transition from no weight loss to more than 10% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients receive palliative therapy for stage iii nsclc because of changes that occur during the diagnostic journey. Shortening or altering that pathway to avoid tumour growth or patient deterioration during care could allow for more patients to be treated with curative intent.
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Sarah DeMello; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Brenda Brewer; Timothy R Church; Kathy L Clingan; Fenghai Duan; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine A Gatsonis; David S Gierada; Amanda Jain; Gordon C Jones; Irene Mahon; Pamela M Marcus; Joshua M Rathmell; JoRean Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Werner-Wasik; C Scott; J D Cox; W T Sause; R W Byhardt; S Asbell; A Russell; R Komaki; J S Lee Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Li Wang; Candace R Correa; James A Hayman; Lujun Zhao; Kemp Cease; Dean Brenner; Doug Arenberg; Jeffery Curtis; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Feng-Ming Kong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Geoffrey A Geiger; Miranda B Kim; Eric P Xanthopoulos; Daniel A Pryma; Surbhi Grover; John P Plastaras; Corey J Langer; Charles B Simone; Ramesh Rengan Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Nithya Ramnath; Thomas J Dilling; Loren J Harris; Anthony W Kim; Gaetane C Michaud; Alex A Balekian; Rebecca Diekemper; Frank C Detterbeck; Douglas A Arenberg Journal: Chest Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Helen Hall; Adam Tocock; Sarah Burdett; David Fisher; William M Ricketts; John Robson; Thomas Round; Sarita Gorolay; Emma MacArthur; Donna Chung; Sam M Janes; Michael D Peake; Neal Navani Journal: Thorax Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 9.102