| Literature DB >> 26715472 |
Christoph P Kaller1, Rudolf Debelak2, Lena Köstering3, Johanna Egle2, Benjamin Rahm4, Philipp S Wild5, Maria Blettner6, Manfred E Beutel7, Josef M Unterrainer4.
Abstract
Planning ahead the consequences of future actions is a prototypical executive function. In clinical and experimental neuropsychology, disc-transfer tasks like the Tower of London (TOL) are commonly used for the assessment of planning ability. Previous psychometric evaluations have, however, yielded a poor reliability of measuring planning performance with the TOL. Based on theory-grounded task analyses and a systematic problem selection, the computerized TOL-Freiburg version (TOL-F) was developed to improve the task's psychometric properties for diagnostic applications. Here, we report reliability estimates for the TOL-F from two large samples collected in Mainz, Germany (n = 3,770; 40-80 years) and in Vienna, Austria (n = 830; 16-84 years). Results show that planning accuracy on the TOL-F possesses an adequate internal consistency and split-half reliability (>0.7) that are stable across the adult life span while the TOL-F covers a broad range of graded difficulty even in healthy adults, making it suitable for both research and clinical application.Keywords: Planning; Problem solving; Reliability; TOL-F; Tower of London
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26715472 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acv088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol ISSN: 0887-6177 Impact factor: 2.813