Literature DB >> 26715189

Ultrasound Image Discrimination between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses Based on a Neural Network Approach.

Verónica Aramendía-Vidaurreta1, Rafael Cabeza2, Arantxa Villanueva2, Javier Navallas2, Juan Luis Alcázar3.   

Abstract

The discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in ultrasound images represents one of the most challenging problems in gynecologic practice. In the study described here, a new method for automatic discrimination of adnexal masses based on a neural networks approach was tested. The proposed method first calculates seven different types of characteristics (local binary pattern, fractal dimension, entropy, invariant moments, gray level co-occurrence matrix, law texture energy and Gabor wavelet) from ultrasound images of the ovary, from which several features are extracted and collected together with the clinical patient age. The proposed technique was validated using 106 benign and 39 malignant images obtained from 145 patients, corresponding to its probability of appearance in general population. On evaluation of the classifier, an accuracy of 98.78%, sensitivity of 98.50%, specificity of 98.90% and area under the curve of 0.997 were calculated.
Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adnexal mass; Classification; Neural network; Texture feature

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26715189     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning for medical ultrasound: status, methods, and future opportunities.

Authors:  Laura J Brattain; Brian A Telfer; Manish Dhyani; Joseph R Grajo; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of different computer-aided diagnostic systems for malignant and benign thyroid nodules classification in ultrasound images: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Ruisheng Liu; Huijuan Li; Fuxiang Liang; Liang Yao; Jieting Liu; Meixuan Li; Liujiao Cao; Bing Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecological Malignant Tumors.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Zhi Ying Zeng; Li Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  The Application of Ultrasound Image in Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Mei Yang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Diagnosing Ovarian Cancer on MRI: A Preliminary Study Comparing Deep Learning and Radiologist Assessments.

Authors:  Tsukasa Saida; Kensaku Mori; Sodai Hoshiai; Masafumi Sakai; Aiko Urushibara; Toshitaka Ishiguro; Manabu Minami; Toyomi Satoh; Takahito Nakajima
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  He-Li Xu; Ting-Ting Gong; Fang-Hua Liu; Hong-Yu Chen; Qian Xiao; Yang Hou; Ying Huang; Hong-Zan Sun; Yu Shi; Song Gao; Yan Lou; Qing Chang; Yu-Hong Zhao; Qing-Lei Gao; Qi-Jun Wu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-09-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.