| Literature DB >> 26714944 |
Alessandro Buda1,2, Cinzia Crivellaro3,4, Federica Elisei4, Giampaolo Di Martino5,3, Luca Guerra4, Elena De Ponti6, Marco Cuzzocrea3, Daniela Giuliani5,3, Federica Sina5,3, Sonia Magni5,3, Claudio Landoni3,4,7, Rodolfo Milani5,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the detection rate (DR) and bilateral optimal mapping (OM) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in women with endometrial and cervical cancer using indocyanine green (ICG) versus the standard technetium-99m radiocolloid ((99m)Tc) radiotracer plus methylene or isosulfan blue, or blue dye alone.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26714944 PMCID: PMC4889617 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5022-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg Oncol ISSN: 1068-9265 Impact factor: 5.344
Patient’s characteristics (N = 163)
| Characteristic |
99mTc + blue dye ( | Blue alone ( | ICG ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | a versus b: 0.900§
| |||
| Median ± SD (range) | 61 ± 13.4 (26–86) | 62 ± 13.2 (29–86) | 59 ± 14.5 (29–86) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | a versus b: 0.026§
| |||
| Median ± SD (range) | 23 ± 4.9 (18–50) | 26 ± 5.3 (18–40) | 25 ± 6.6 (15–50) | |
| Type of tumor | a versus b: 0.071* | |||
| Cervical | 28 (36.4 %) | 8 (21.1 %) | 9 (18.8 %) | |
| Endometrial | 49 (63.6 %) | 30 (78.9 %) | 39 (81.2 %) | |
| pT stage (final pathology) | ||||
| Cervical | a versus b: 0.163* | |||
| IA2 | 3 (10.7 %) | 2 (28.6 %) | 2 (22.2 %) | |
| IB1 | 23 (82.1 %) | 4 (57.1 %) | 7 (77.8 %) | |
| IIA | 2 (7.1 %) | – | – | |
| IIB | – | 1a (14.3 %) | – | |
| Endometrial | a versus b: 0.581* | |||
| EIN | – | – | 2 (5.1 %) | |
| IA | 23 (46.9 %) | 17 (56.7 %) | 27 (69.2 %) | |
| IB | 10 (20.4 %) | 8 (26.7 %) | 3 (7.7 %) | |
| II | 4 (8.2 %) | – | 1 (2.6 %) | |
| IIIA | – | – | 1 (2.6 %) | |
| IIIC1 | 10 (20.4 %) | 5 (16.7 %) | 4 (10.3 %) | |
| IIIC2 | 1 (2.0 %) | – | – | |
| IV | 1 (2.0 %) | – | 1 (2.6 %) | |
| Histology (final pathology) | ||||
| Cervical | a versus b: 0.210* | |||
| Squamous | 18 (64.3 %) | 7 (87.5 %) | 6 (66.7 %) | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 10 (35.7 %) | 1 (12.5 %) | 3 (33.3 %) | |
| Endometrial | ||||
| EIN | – | – | 2 (5.1 %) | a versus b: 0. 867* |
| Endometrioid | 41 (83.7 %) | 27 (90.0 %) | 33 (84.6 %) | |
| Serous papillary | 2 (4.1 %) | 1 (3.3 %) | 3 (7.7 %) | |
| Other | 6 (12.2 %) | 2 (6.7 %) | 1 (2.6 %) | |
| Grade | a versus b: 0.487* | |||
| G1 | 19 (25.7 %) | 10 (27.0 %) | 15 (31.2 %) | |
| G2 | 31 (41.9 %) | 19 (51.4 %) | 17 (35.5 %) | |
| G3 | 24 (32.4 %) | 8 (21.6 %) | 16 (33.3 %) | |
| NA | 3# | 1^ | – | |
| LVSI | a versus b: 0.442* | |||
| Yes | 31 (40.3 %) | 14 (36.8 %) | 10 (20.8 %) | |
| No | 46 (59.7 %) | 24 (63.2 %) | 38 (79.2 %) | |
SD standard deviation, Tc technetium-99 radiocolloid, ICG indocyanine green, NA not available, LVSI lymphovascular space involvement, BMI body mass index
aWoman with clinical 1B1 cervical cancer demonstrated foci of tumor that involved both parametrial tissues at final pathology (stage pT IIB disease)
* Fisher’s exact test; § Rank sum test; # EIN endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; ^ CIS cervical intraepithelial in situ
Fig. 1SLN anatomic distribution and metastasis location in the study population. In our population, 384 SLNs were obtained by all modalities. Number of SLNs per site indicated by circles; number of positive SLNs at histology indicated by triangles. *Four SLNs were in parametrial site. SLN sentinel lymph node
Surgical procedure and pathological characteristics of LNs and SLNs (N = 163)
| Characteristic |
99mTc + blue dye ( | Blue alone ( | ICG ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical approach | a versus b: 0.338* | |||
| MIS | 46 (59.7 %) | 25 (65.8 %) | 44 (91.7 %) | |
| Open | 31 (40.3 %) | 13 (34.2 %) | 4 (8.3 %) | |
| Type of surgery | a versus b: 0.111* | |||
| SH + BSO + PLND | 37 (48.1 %) | 27 (71.1 %) | 31 (64.6 %) | |
| SH + BSO + PLND + omentectomy | 2 (2.6 %) | 1 (2.6 %) | 3 (6.3 %) | |
| SH + BSO + PLND + PALND | 10 (13.0 %) | 2 (5.3 %) | 5 (10.4 %) | |
| RH + PLND | 27 (35.1 %) | 7 (18.4 %) | 9 (18.8 %) | |
| RH + PLND + PALND | 1 (1.3 %) | 1 (2.6 %) | – | |
| LN surgical staging | ||||
| Pelvic LNs, median (range) | 25 (6–54) | 22 (4–58) | 23 (7–33) | |
| Aortic LNs, median (range) | 15 (2–29) | 10 (2–18) | 8 (4–17) | |
| SLN per patients, median (range) | 2 (0–9) | 2 (0–4) | 2 (0–6) | a versus b: 0.0001§
|
| Mapping by side | a versus b: 0.042* | |||
| None | 2 (2.6 %) | 6 (15.8 %) | 0 | |
| Unilateral | 30 (39.0 %) | 13 (34.2 %) | 7 (14.6 %) | |
| Bilateral | 45 (58.4 %) | 19 (50.0 %) | 41 (85.4 %) | |
| Patients with positive LN, | 18 (23.4 %) | 5 (13.2 %) | 8 (16.7 %) | a versus b: 0.149* |
| Positive SLN, | 31 (15.0 %) | 8 (12.9 %) | 12 (10.3 %) | a versus b: 0.425* |
| Type of metastasis, | a versus b: 0.744* | |||
| Macrometastasis | 25 (80.6) | 6 (75.0) | 6 (50.0) | |
| Micrometastasis | 4 (12.9) | 2 (25.0) | 5 (41.7) | |
| ITC | 2 (6.5) | 0 | 1 (8.3) |
LN lymph node, SLN sentinel lymph node, Tc technetium-99 radiocolloid, ICG indocyanine green, MIS minimally invasive surgery, SH simple hysterectomy, BSO, PLND pelvic lymphadenectomy, PALND para-aortic lymphadenectomy, RH radical hysterectomy, ITC isolated tumor cell
* Fisher’s exact test
§Rank sum test
SLN mapping according to tumor (N = 163)
| Characteristic | Cervical ( | Endometrial, ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Cervical | Endometrial | |
| SLN detection rate | NA | 0.004* | ||
| 99mTc with blue due | 28/28 (100 %) | 42/44 (95 %) | ||
| Blue dye alone | 8/8 (100 %) | 24/30 (80 %) | ||
| ICG | 9/9 (100 %) | 40/40 (100 %) | ||
| Bilateral mapping | 0.111* | 0.004* | ||
| 99mTc with blue dye | 23/28 (82 %) | 22/44 (50 %) | ||
| Blue dye alone | 5/8 (63 %) | 14/30 (47 %) | ||
| ICG | 9/9 (100 %) | 32/40 (80 %) | ||
SLN sentinel lymph node, NA not available, Tc technetium-99 radiocolloid, ICG indocyanine green
* Fisher’s exact test
Fig. 2Typical location of sentinel lymph node (SLN). a White light view of a SLN (asterisk) located in the ventral medial aspect of the external iliac artery (EIA). b The appearance of the SLN with the ICG real-time florescence Storz SPIES HD for laparoscopic platform. EIA external iliac artery, IIA internal iliac artery, EIV external iliac vein, U ureter, LP lateral parametrium